Cargando…
Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis
PURPOSE: Restoring the native patellar thickness after patellar resurfacing provides optimal function of the knee after arthroplasty and minimises complications related to the patellofemoral articulation. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of a thin patellar button (6.2 mm) in patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Knee Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843200 http://dx.doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.17.097 |
_version_ | 1783329558224699392 |
---|---|
author | Jhurani, Anoop Agarwal, Piyush Aswal, Mukesh Saxena, Purvi Singh, Nidhi |
author_facet | Jhurani, Anoop Agarwal, Piyush Aswal, Mukesh Saxena, Purvi Singh, Nidhi |
author_sort | Jhurani, Anoop |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Restoring the native patellar thickness after patellar resurfacing provides optimal function of the knee after arthroplasty and minimises complications related to the patellofemoral articulation. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of a thin patellar button (6.2 mm) in patients with a patella thickness of less than 20 mm during total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case control study. A total of 54 female patients with an intraoperative patellar thickness of <20 mm, resurfaced with a patellar button of 6.2 mm in thickness were identified (group 1). They were matched with 54 patients with a patellar thickness of 20–23 mm, resurfaced with a patellar button of 8 mm (group 2), based on age, sex, body mass index, and deformity. A clinical and radiological evaluation was done at a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The preoperative mean patellar thickness was 18.94±1.07 mm and was restored to 19.06±0.79 mm in group 1, as compared to 21.63±0.99 mm and 21.72±0.99 mm in group 2. The mean postoperative range of motion was 122.22°±9.25° in group 1 and 123.52°±8.72° in group 2 (p=0.13). No patellar bone or button related complications were observed in any patient in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The 6.2 mm thin patella is useful to restore the native thickness in patients with a patellar thickness of less than 20 mm without risk of button fracture, loosening or overstuffing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5990234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Knee Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59902342018-06-12 Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis Jhurani, Anoop Agarwal, Piyush Aswal, Mukesh Saxena, Purvi Singh, Nidhi Knee Surg Relat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Restoring the native patellar thickness after patellar resurfacing provides optimal function of the knee after arthroplasty and minimises complications related to the patellofemoral articulation. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of a thin patellar button (6.2 mm) in patients with a patella thickness of less than 20 mm during total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case control study. A total of 54 female patients with an intraoperative patellar thickness of <20 mm, resurfaced with a patellar button of 6.2 mm in thickness were identified (group 1). They were matched with 54 patients with a patellar thickness of 20–23 mm, resurfaced with a patellar button of 8 mm (group 2), based on age, sex, body mass index, and deformity. A clinical and radiological evaluation was done at a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The preoperative mean patellar thickness was 18.94±1.07 mm and was restored to 19.06±0.79 mm in group 1, as compared to 21.63±0.99 mm and 21.72±0.99 mm in group 2. The mean postoperative range of motion was 122.22°±9.25° in group 1 and 123.52°±8.72° in group 2 (p=0.13). No patellar bone or button related complications were observed in any patient in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The 6.2 mm thin patella is useful to restore the native thickness in patients with a patellar thickness of less than 20 mm without risk of button fracture, loosening or overstuffing. Korean Knee Society 2018-06 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5990234/ /pubmed/29843200 http://dx.doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.17.097 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Knee Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jhurani, Anoop Agarwal, Piyush Aswal, Mukesh Saxena, Purvi Singh, Nidhi Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis |
title | Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis |
title_full | Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis |
title_short | Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of 6.2 mm patellar button in resurfacing less than 20 mm thin patella: a matched pair analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843200 http://dx.doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.17.097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jhuranianoop safetyandefficacyof62mmpatellarbuttoninresurfacinglessthan20mmthinpatellaamatchedpairanalysis AT agarwalpiyush safetyandefficacyof62mmpatellarbuttoninresurfacinglessthan20mmthinpatellaamatchedpairanalysis AT aswalmukesh safetyandefficacyof62mmpatellarbuttoninresurfacinglessthan20mmthinpatellaamatchedpairanalysis AT saxenapurvi safetyandefficacyof62mmpatellarbuttoninresurfacinglessthan20mmthinpatellaamatchedpairanalysis AT singhnidhi safetyandefficacyof62mmpatellarbuttoninresurfacinglessthan20mmthinpatellaamatchedpairanalysis |