Cargando…

Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess potential improvements in clinical outcomes when applying recent advanced hip arthroplasty surgical techniques and understand the potential relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 37 cases of peri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Joong-Myung, Kim, Tae-sup, Kim, Tae-ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Hip Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896456
http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2018.30.2.78
_version_ 1783329593174786048
author Lee, Joong-Myung
Kim, Tae-sup
Kim, Tae-ho
author_facet Lee, Joong-Myung
Kim, Tae-sup
Kim, Tae-ho
author_sort Lee, Joong-Myung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess potential improvements in clinical outcomes when applying recent advanced hip arthroplasty surgical techniques and understand the potential relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 37 cases of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty treated between March 2014 and September 2016, all included a follow-up of at least one year and were included in this study. Outcomes were evaluated using the Beals and Tower's criteria. BMD was examined in 27 of 37 cases and the relationship between osteoporosis and treatment outcomes was analyzed. Advanced hip arthroplasty surgical approaches varied depending on the fracture type: i) open reduction with wiring for Vancouver A, ii) open reduction with double plate fixation for Vancouver B1, iii) revision THA with long stem for Vancouver B1-Nonunion, B2 and B3, and iv) open reduction with double plate fixation for Vancouver C. RESULTS: When assessed using the Beals and Tower's criteria, 33 out of 37 (89.2%) patients were excellent and 4 (10.8%) were poor. These outcomes were an improvement compared with series I (81.8%). When analyzed according to the Vancouver classification, patients with type A (n=8), type B1 (n=16), and type B2 (n=2) were all excellent, the patients with type B3 were excellent (n=1) and poor (n=1), and the patients with type C were excellent (n=6) and poor (n=3). The mean BMD was −2.6 (T-score) in 27 of 37 cases and −4.4 in 4 cases with poor prognosis. Osteoporosis was statistically correlated to those classified as poor by Beals and Tower. CONCLUSION: The results of the analysis suggest that applying new surgical hip arthroplasty treatment approaches leads to improved outcomes compared with the author's previous study. When treating periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty, an appropriate internal fixation method should be selected, at least in part based on the Vancouver classification. In addition, osteoporosis may be a major prognostic factor for the outcomes of surgical treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5990531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Hip Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59905312018-06-12 Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty Lee, Joong-Myung Kim, Tae-sup Kim, Tae-ho Hip Pelvis Original Article PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess potential improvements in clinical outcomes when applying recent advanced hip arthroplasty surgical techniques and understand the potential relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 37 cases of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty treated between March 2014 and September 2016, all included a follow-up of at least one year and were included in this study. Outcomes were evaluated using the Beals and Tower's criteria. BMD was examined in 27 of 37 cases and the relationship between osteoporosis and treatment outcomes was analyzed. Advanced hip arthroplasty surgical approaches varied depending on the fracture type: i) open reduction with wiring for Vancouver A, ii) open reduction with double plate fixation for Vancouver B1, iii) revision THA with long stem for Vancouver B1-Nonunion, B2 and B3, and iv) open reduction with double plate fixation for Vancouver C. RESULTS: When assessed using the Beals and Tower's criteria, 33 out of 37 (89.2%) patients were excellent and 4 (10.8%) were poor. These outcomes were an improvement compared with series I (81.8%). When analyzed according to the Vancouver classification, patients with type A (n=8), type B1 (n=16), and type B2 (n=2) were all excellent, the patients with type B3 were excellent (n=1) and poor (n=1), and the patients with type C were excellent (n=6) and poor (n=3). The mean BMD was −2.6 (T-score) in 27 of 37 cases and −4.4 in 4 cases with poor prognosis. Osteoporosis was statistically correlated to those classified as poor by Beals and Tower. CONCLUSION: The results of the analysis suggest that applying new surgical hip arthroplasty treatment approaches leads to improved outcomes compared with the author's previous study. When treating periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty, an appropriate internal fixation method should be selected, at least in part based on the Vancouver classification. In addition, osteoporosis may be a major prognostic factor for the outcomes of surgical treatment. Korean Hip Society 2018-06 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5990531/ /pubmed/29896456 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2018.30.2.78 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Hip Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Joong-Myung
Kim, Tae-sup
Kim, Tae-ho
Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty
title Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty
title_full Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty
title_short Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty
title_sort treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896456
http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2018.30.2.78
work_keys_str_mv AT leejoongmyung treatmentofperiprostheticfemoralfracturesfollowinghiparthroplasty
AT kimtaesup treatmentofperiprostheticfemoralfracturesfollowinghiparthroplasty
AT kimtaeho treatmentofperiprostheticfemoralfracturesfollowinghiparthroplasty