Cargando…

Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Routine hemodynamic monitoring parameters under general anesthesia, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and perfusion index (PI), do not solely reflect intraoperative nociceptive levels. We developed a hemodynamic model combining these 3 parameters for nociceptive res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirose, Munetaka, Kobayashi, Yoshiko, Nakamoto, Shiro, Ueki, Ryusuke, Kariya, Nobutaka, Tatara, Tsuneo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29779036
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.907484
_version_ 1783329713281826816
author Hirose, Munetaka
Kobayashi, Yoshiko
Nakamoto, Shiro
Ueki, Ryusuke
Kariya, Nobutaka
Tatara, Tsuneo
author_facet Hirose, Munetaka
Kobayashi, Yoshiko
Nakamoto, Shiro
Ueki, Ryusuke
Kariya, Nobutaka
Tatara, Tsuneo
author_sort Hirose, Munetaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine hemodynamic monitoring parameters under general anesthesia, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and perfusion index (PI), do not solely reflect intraoperative nociceptive levels. We developed a hemodynamic model combining these 3 parameters for nociceptive responses during general anesthesia, and evaluated nociceptive responses to surgical skin incision. MATERIAL/METHODS: We first retrospectively performed discriminant analysis using 3 values – HR, SBP, and PI – to assess response to skin incision during tympanoplasty, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open gastrectomy to determine if combined use of these parameters differentiates nociceptive levels among these 3 surgeries. Secondly, ordinal logistic regression analysis was applied using the 3 parameters to develop an equation representing nociceptive response during general anesthesia, and then evaluated its utility to discern nociceptive responses to skin incision. RESULTS: We developed the following hemodynamic model as calculated nociceptive response= −1+2/(1+ exp(−0.01 HR −0.02 SBP +0.17 PI)), and prospectively determined that calculated nociceptive responses to small skin incision for laparoscopic surgery were significantly lower than responses to large skin incision for laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our hemodynamic model using HR, SBP, and PI likely reflects nociceptive levels at skin incision during general anesthesia, and quantitatively discerned the difference in nociceptive responses to skin incision between laparoscopy and laparotomy. This model could be applicable to assess either real-time nociceptive responses or averaged nociceptive responses throughout surgery without using special equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5990992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59909922018-06-07 Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia Hirose, Munetaka Kobayashi, Yoshiko Nakamoto, Shiro Ueki, Ryusuke Kariya, Nobutaka Tatara, Tsuneo Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Routine hemodynamic monitoring parameters under general anesthesia, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and perfusion index (PI), do not solely reflect intraoperative nociceptive levels. We developed a hemodynamic model combining these 3 parameters for nociceptive responses during general anesthesia, and evaluated nociceptive responses to surgical skin incision. MATERIAL/METHODS: We first retrospectively performed discriminant analysis using 3 values – HR, SBP, and PI – to assess response to skin incision during tympanoplasty, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open gastrectomy to determine if combined use of these parameters differentiates nociceptive levels among these 3 surgeries. Secondly, ordinal logistic regression analysis was applied using the 3 parameters to develop an equation representing nociceptive response during general anesthesia, and then evaluated its utility to discern nociceptive responses to skin incision. RESULTS: We developed the following hemodynamic model as calculated nociceptive response= −1+2/(1+ exp(−0.01 HR −0.02 SBP +0.17 PI)), and prospectively determined that calculated nociceptive responses to small skin incision for laparoscopic surgery were significantly lower than responses to large skin incision for laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our hemodynamic model using HR, SBP, and PI likely reflects nociceptive levels at skin incision during general anesthesia, and quantitatively discerned the difference in nociceptive responses to skin incision between laparoscopy and laparotomy. This model could be applicable to assess either real-time nociceptive responses or averaged nociceptive responses throughout surgery without using special equipment. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5990992/ /pubmed/29779036 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.907484 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Hirose, Munetaka
Kobayashi, Yoshiko
Nakamoto, Shiro
Ueki, Ryusuke
Kariya, Nobutaka
Tatara, Tsuneo
Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia
title Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia
title_full Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia
title_fullStr Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia
title_short Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia
title_sort development of a hemodynamic model using routine monitoring parameters for nociceptive responses evaluation during surgery under general anesthesia
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29779036
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.907484
work_keys_str_mv AT hirosemunetaka developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia
AT kobayashiyoshiko developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia
AT nakamotoshiro developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia
AT uekiryusuke developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia
AT kariyanobutaka developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia
AT tataratsuneo developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia