Cargando…
Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia
BACKGROUND: Routine hemodynamic monitoring parameters under general anesthesia, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and perfusion index (PI), do not solely reflect intraoperative nociceptive levels. We developed a hemodynamic model combining these 3 parameters for nociceptive res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29779036 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.907484 |
_version_ | 1783329713281826816 |
---|---|
author | Hirose, Munetaka Kobayashi, Yoshiko Nakamoto, Shiro Ueki, Ryusuke Kariya, Nobutaka Tatara, Tsuneo |
author_facet | Hirose, Munetaka Kobayashi, Yoshiko Nakamoto, Shiro Ueki, Ryusuke Kariya, Nobutaka Tatara, Tsuneo |
author_sort | Hirose, Munetaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Routine hemodynamic monitoring parameters under general anesthesia, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and perfusion index (PI), do not solely reflect intraoperative nociceptive levels. We developed a hemodynamic model combining these 3 parameters for nociceptive responses during general anesthesia, and evaluated nociceptive responses to surgical skin incision. MATERIAL/METHODS: We first retrospectively performed discriminant analysis using 3 values – HR, SBP, and PI – to assess response to skin incision during tympanoplasty, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open gastrectomy to determine if combined use of these parameters differentiates nociceptive levels among these 3 surgeries. Secondly, ordinal logistic regression analysis was applied using the 3 parameters to develop an equation representing nociceptive response during general anesthesia, and then evaluated its utility to discern nociceptive responses to skin incision. RESULTS: We developed the following hemodynamic model as calculated nociceptive response= −1+2/(1+ exp(−0.01 HR −0.02 SBP +0.17 PI)), and prospectively determined that calculated nociceptive responses to small skin incision for laparoscopic surgery were significantly lower than responses to large skin incision for laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our hemodynamic model using HR, SBP, and PI likely reflects nociceptive levels at skin incision during general anesthesia, and quantitatively discerned the difference in nociceptive responses to skin incision between laparoscopy and laparotomy. This model could be applicable to assess either real-time nociceptive responses or averaged nociceptive responses throughout surgery without using special equipment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5990992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59909922018-06-07 Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia Hirose, Munetaka Kobayashi, Yoshiko Nakamoto, Shiro Ueki, Ryusuke Kariya, Nobutaka Tatara, Tsuneo Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Routine hemodynamic monitoring parameters under general anesthesia, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and perfusion index (PI), do not solely reflect intraoperative nociceptive levels. We developed a hemodynamic model combining these 3 parameters for nociceptive responses during general anesthesia, and evaluated nociceptive responses to surgical skin incision. MATERIAL/METHODS: We first retrospectively performed discriminant analysis using 3 values – HR, SBP, and PI – to assess response to skin incision during tympanoplasty, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open gastrectomy to determine if combined use of these parameters differentiates nociceptive levels among these 3 surgeries. Secondly, ordinal logistic regression analysis was applied using the 3 parameters to develop an equation representing nociceptive response during general anesthesia, and then evaluated its utility to discern nociceptive responses to skin incision. RESULTS: We developed the following hemodynamic model as calculated nociceptive response= −1+2/(1+ exp(−0.01 HR −0.02 SBP +0.17 PI)), and prospectively determined that calculated nociceptive responses to small skin incision for laparoscopic surgery were significantly lower than responses to large skin incision for laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our hemodynamic model using HR, SBP, and PI likely reflects nociceptive levels at skin incision during general anesthesia, and quantitatively discerned the difference in nociceptive responses to skin incision between laparoscopy and laparotomy. This model could be applicable to assess either real-time nociceptive responses or averaged nociceptive responses throughout surgery without using special equipment. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5990992/ /pubmed/29779036 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.907484 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Hirose, Munetaka Kobayashi, Yoshiko Nakamoto, Shiro Ueki, Ryusuke Kariya, Nobutaka Tatara, Tsuneo Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia |
title | Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia |
title_full | Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia |
title_short | Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia |
title_sort | development of a hemodynamic model using routine monitoring parameters for nociceptive responses evaluation during surgery under general anesthesia |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5990992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29779036 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.907484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirosemunetaka developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia AT kobayashiyoshiko developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia AT nakamotoshiro developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia AT uekiryusuke developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia AT kariyanobutaka developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia AT tataratsuneo developmentofahemodynamicmodelusingroutinemonitoringparametersfornociceptiveresponsesevaluationduringsurgeryundergeneralanesthesia |