Cargando…

Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock

BACKGROUND: Mean values of hemodynamic variables are poorly effective in evaluating an actual recovery of the short-term autonomic mechanisms for blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) regulation. The aim of this work is to analyze the response to therapy in the early phase of septic shock to verif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrara, Marta, Bollen Pinto, Bernardo, Baselli, Giuseppe, Bendjelid, Karim, Ferrario, Manuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29112634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001046
_version_ 1783329748470988800
author Carrara, Marta
Bollen Pinto, Bernardo
Baselli, Giuseppe
Bendjelid, Karim
Ferrario, Manuela
author_facet Carrara, Marta
Bollen Pinto, Bernardo
Baselli, Giuseppe
Bendjelid, Karim
Ferrario, Manuela
author_sort Carrara, Marta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mean values of hemodynamic variables are poorly effective in evaluating an actual recovery of the short-term autonomic mechanisms for blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) regulation. The aim of this work is to analyze the response to therapy in the early phase of septic shock to verify possible associations between BP recovery and BP autonomic control. METHODS: This is an ancillary study from the multicenter prospective observational trial Shockomics (NCT02141607). A total of 21 septic shock patients were studied at two time points during the acute phase of shock and were classified according to changes in SOFA score. Time series of BP components and HR were analyzed in time and frequency domain. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was assessed, and a mathematical model for the decomposition of diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) oscillations was used to understand the different contributions of BRS and HR on peripheral vascular resistance control. RESULTS: Only those patients, who significantly improved organ function (responders, R), showed an increase of mean value and low frequency (LF) power in BP time series. Fluid accumulation was higher in the non-responders (NR). BRS increased in NR and the model of DAP variability showed that the contribution of HR was highly reduced in NR. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients reached the mean BP target of 65 mmHg, our analyses highlighted important differences in terms of autonomic nervous system control. BP variability, HR variability and baroreflex trends can add information to individual vital sign measure such as mean BP, and can help in understanding the responsiveness to the combination of symphatomimetic drugs and fluid therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5991174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59911742018-06-19 Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock Carrara, Marta Bollen Pinto, Bernardo Baselli, Giuseppe Bendjelid, Karim Ferrario, Manuela Shock Clinical Science Aspects BACKGROUND: Mean values of hemodynamic variables are poorly effective in evaluating an actual recovery of the short-term autonomic mechanisms for blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) regulation. The aim of this work is to analyze the response to therapy in the early phase of septic shock to verify possible associations between BP recovery and BP autonomic control. METHODS: This is an ancillary study from the multicenter prospective observational trial Shockomics (NCT02141607). A total of 21 septic shock patients were studied at two time points during the acute phase of shock and were classified according to changes in SOFA score. Time series of BP components and HR were analyzed in time and frequency domain. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was assessed, and a mathematical model for the decomposition of diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) oscillations was used to understand the different contributions of BRS and HR on peripheral vascular resistance control. RESULTS: Only those patients, who significantly improved organ function (responders, R), showed an increase of mean value and low frequency (LF) power in BP time series. Fluid accumulation was higher in the non-responders (NR). BRS increased in NR and the model of DAP variability showed that the contribution of HR was highly reduced in NR. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients reached the mean BP target of 65 mmHg, our analyses highlighted important differences in terms of autonomic nervous system control. BP variability, HR variability and baroreflex trends can add information to individual vital sign measure such as mean BP, and can help in understanding the responsiveness to the combination of symphatomimetic drugs and fluid therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-07 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5991174/ /pubmed/29112634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001046 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Shock Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Clinical Science Aspects
Carrara, Marta
Bollen Pinto, Bernardo
Baselli, Giuseppe
Bendjelid, Karim
Ferrario, Manuela
Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock
title Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock
title_full Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock
title_fullStr Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock
title_short Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock
title_sort baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure variability can help in understanding the different response to therapy during acute phase of septic shock
topic Clinical Science Aspects
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29112634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001046
work_keys_str_mv AT carraramarta baroreflexsensitivityandbloodpressurevariabilitycanhelpinunderstandingthedifferentresponsetotherapyduringacutephaseofsepticshock
AT bollenpintobernardo baroreflexsensitivityandbloodpressurevariabilitycanhelpinunderstandingthedifferentresponsetotherapyduringacutephaseofsepticshock
AT baselligiuseppe baroreflexsensitivityandbloodpressurevariabilitycanhelpinunderstandingthedifferentresponsetotherapyduringacutephaseofsepticshock
AT bendjelidkarim baroreflexsensitivityandbloodpressurevariabilitycanhelpinunderstandingthedifferentresponsetotherapyduringacutephaseofsepticshock
AT ferrariomanuela baroreflexsensitivityandbloodpressurevariabilitycanhelpinunderstandingthedifferentresponsetotherapyduringacutephaseofsepticshock