Cargando…

Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of InterTAN nail (IT) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for managing primary AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric hip fractures (IHFs) in older osteoporotic patients. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or older who received surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chi, Xu, Bo, Liang, Guanzhao, Zeng, Xianshang, Zeng, Dan, Chen, Deng, Ge, Zhe, Yu, Weiguang, Zhang, Xinchao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29517952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518761504
_version_ 1783329764828774400
author Zhang, Chi
Xu, Bo
Liang, Guanzhao
Zeng, Xianshang
Zeng, Dan
Chen, Deng
Ge, Zhe
Yu, Weiguang
Zhang, Xinchao
author_facet Zhang, Chi
Xu, Bo
Liang, Guanzhao
Zeng, Xianshang
Zeng, Dan
Chen, Deng
Ge, Zhe
Yu, Weiguang
Zhang, Xinchao
author_sort Zhang, Chi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of InterTAN nail (IT) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for managing primary AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric hip fractures (IHFs) in older osteoporotic patients. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or older who received surgical treatment for IHFs (AO/OTA 3.1A2.1-A2.3) with IT or PFNA were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the postoperative treatment failure rate. The secondary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS). RESULTS: A total of 326 osteoporotic cases (326 hips: IT, n = 162; PFNA, n = 164) were assessed with a mean follow-up of 43.5 months (range, 38–48 months). For the entire cohort, the incidence of postoperative treatment failure (periprosthetic fracture and reoperation) was 29/326 (8.9%); the IT-treated cohort (7/162, 4.3%) had a significantly lower rate compared with the PFNA-treated cohort (22/165, 13.3%). The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures was significantly lower in the IT-treated cohort than in the PFNA-treated cohort (2.5% vs 7.9%). The postoperative HHS at the final follow-up was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: IT might show a better outcome in managing osteoporotic AO/OTA 31-A2 IHFs in terms of periprosthetic fracture and reoperation compared with PFNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5991238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59912382018-06-13 Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis Zhang, Chi Xu, Bo Liang, Guanzhao Zeng, Xianshang Zeng, Dan Chen, Deng Ge, Zhe Yu, Weiguang Zhang, Xinchao J Int Med Res Clinical Reports OBJECTIVES: To compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of InterTAN nail (IT) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for managing primary AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric hip fractures (IHFs) in older osteoporotic patients. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or older who received surgical treatment for IHFs (AO/OTA 3.1A2.1-A2.3) with IT or PFNA were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the postoperative treatment failure rate. The secondary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS). RESULTS: A total of 326 osteoporotic cases (326 hips: IT, n = 162; PFNA, n = 164) were assessed with a mean follow-up of 43.5 months (range, 38–48 months). For the entire cohort, the incidence of postoperative treatment failure (periprosthetic fracture and reoperation) was 29/326 (8.9%); the IT-treated cohort (7/162, 4.3%) had a significantly lower rate compared with the PFNA-treated cohort (22/165, 13.3%). The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures was significantly lower in the IT-treated cohort than in the PFNA-treated cohort (2.5% vs 7.9%). The postoperative HHS at the final follow-up was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: IT might show a better outcome in managing osteoporotic AO/OTA 31-A2 IHFs in terms of periprosthetic fracture and reoperation compared with PFNA. SAGE Publications 2018-03-08 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5991238/ /pubmed/29517952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518761504 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Reports
Zhang, Chi
Xu, Bo
Liang, Guanzhao
Zeng, Xianshang
Zeng, Dan
Chen, Deng
Ge, Zhe
Yu, Weiguang
Zhang, Xinchao
Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis
title Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis
title_full Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis
title_fullStr Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis
title_short Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis
title_sort optimizing stability in ao/ota 31-a2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis
topic Clinical Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29517952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518761504
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchi optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis
AT xubo optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis
AT liangguanzhao optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis
AT zengxianshang optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis
AT zengdan optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis
AT chendeng optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis
AT gezhe optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis
AT yuweiguang optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis
AT zhangxinchao optimizingstabilityinaoota31a2intertrochantericfracturefixationinolderpatientswithosteoporosis