Cargando…
Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort
PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established primary treatment for newly diagnosed brain metastases with high local control rates. However, data about local re-irradiation in case of local failure after SRS (re-SRS) are rare. We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy and patient selection...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29874299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198692 |
_version_ | 1783329813515206656 |
---|---|
author | Balermpas, Panagiotis Stera, Susanne Müller von der Grün, Jens Loutfi-Krauss, Britta Forster, Marie-Thérèse Wagner, Marlies Keller, Christian Rödel, Claus Seifert, Volker Blanck, Oliver Wolff, Robert |
author_facet | Balermpas, Panagiotis Stera, Susanne Müller von der Grün, Jens Loutfi-Krauss, Britta Forster, Marie-Thérèse Wagner, Marlies Keller, Christian Rödel, Claus Seifert, Volker Blanck, Oliver Wolff, Robert |
author_sort | Balermpas, Panagiotis |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established primary treatment for newly diagnosed brain metastases with high local control rates. However, data about local re-irradiation in case of local failure after SRS (re-SRS) are rare. We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy and patient selection characteristics in treating locally recurrent metastases with a second course of SRS. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with brain metastases treated with re-SRS for local tumor progression between 2011 and 2017. Patient and treatment characteristics as well as rates of tumor control, survival and toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 32 locally recurrent brain metastases in 31 patients were irradiated with re-SRS. Median age at re-SRS was 64.9 years. The primary histology was breast cancer and non-small-cellular lung cancer (NSCLC) in respectively 10 cases (31.3%), in 5 cases malignant melanoma (15.6%). In the first SRS-course 19 metastases (59.4%) and in the re-SRS-course 29 metastases (90.6%) were treated with CyberKnife(®) and the others with Gamma Knife. Median planning target volume (PTV) for re-SRS was 2.5 cm(3) (range, 0.1–37.5 cm(3)) and median dose prescribed to the PTV was 19 Gy (range, 12–28 Gy) in 1–5 fractions to the median 69% isodose (range, 53–80%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 61.7% and the 1-year local control rate was 79.5%. The overall rate of radiological radio-necrosis was 16.1% and four patients (12.9%) experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: A second course of SRS for locally recurrent brain metastases after prior local SRS appears to be feasible with acceptable toxicity and can be considered as salvage treatment option for selected patients with high performance status. Furthermore, this is the first study utilizing robotic radiosurgery for this indication, as an additional option for frameless fractionated treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5991396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59913962018-06-08 Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort Balermpas, Panagiotis Stera, Susanne Müller von der Grün, Jens Loutfi-Krauss, Britta Forster, Marie-Thérèse Wagner, Marlies Keller, Christian Rödel, Claus Seifert, Volker Blanck, Oliver Wolff, Robert PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established primary treatment for newly diagnosed brain metastases with high local control rates. However, data about local re-irradiation in case of local failure after SRS (re-SRS) are rare. We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy and patient selection characteristics in treating locally recurrent metastases with a second course of SRS. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with brain metastases treated with re-SRS for local tumor progression between 2011 and 2017. Patient and treatment characteristics as well as rates of tumor control, survival and toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 32 locally recurrent brain metastases in 31 patients were irradiated with re-SRS. Median age at re-SRS was 64.9 years. The primary histology was breast cancer and non-small-cellular lung cancer (NSCLC) in respectively 10 cases (31.3%), in 5 cases malignant melanoma (15.6%). In the first SRS-course 19 metastases (59.4%) and in the re-SRS-course 29 metastases (90.6%) were treated with CyberKnife(®) and the others with Gamma Knife. Median planning target volume (PTV) for re-SRS was 2.5 cm(3) (range, 0.1–37.5 cm(3)) and median dose prescribed to the PTV was 19 Gy (range, 12–28 Gy) in 1–5 fractions to the median 69% isodose (range, 53–80%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 61.7% and the 1-year local control rate was 79.5%. The overall rate of radiological radio-necrosis was 16.1% and four patients (12.9%) experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: A second course of SRS for locally recurrent brain metastases after prior local SRS appears to be feasible with acceptable toxicity and can be considered as salvage treatment option for selected patients with high performance status. Furthermore, this is the first study utilizing robotic radiosurgery for this indication, as an additional option for frameless fractionated treatment. Public Library of Science 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5991396/ /pubmed/29874299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198692 Text en © 2018 Balermpas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Balermpas, Panagiotis Stera, Susanne Müller von der Grün, Jens Loutfi-Krauss, Britta Forster, Marie-Thérèse Wagner, Marlies Keller, Christian Rödel, Claus Seifert, Volker Blanck, Oliver Wolff, Robert Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort |
title | Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort |
title_full | Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort |
title_fullStr | Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort |
title_short | Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort |
title_sort | repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29874299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198692 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balermpaspanagiotis repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT sterasusanne repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT mullervondergrunjens repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT loutfikraussbritta repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT forstermarietherese repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT wagnermarlies repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT kellerchristian repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT rodelclaus repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT seifertvolker repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT blanckoliver repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort AT wolffrobert repeatedinfieldradiosurgeryforlocallyrecurrentbrainmetastasesfeasibilityresultsandsurvivalinaheavilytreatedpatientcohort |