Cargando…
General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study
BACKGROUND: Guideline adherence in chronic kidney disease management is low, despite guideline implementation initiatives. Knowing general practitioners’ (GPs’) perspectives of management of early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the applicability of the national interdisciplinary guideline co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0736-3 |
_version_ | 1783329823281643520 |
---|---|
author | van Dipten, Carola van Berkel, Saskia de Grauw, Wim J. C. Scherpbier-de Haan, Nynke D. Brongers, Bouke van Spaendonck, Karel Wetzels, Jack F. M. Assendelft, Willem J. J. Dees, Marianne K. |
author_facet | van Dipten, Carola van Berkel, Saskia de Grauw, Wim J. C. Scherpbier-de Haan, Nynke D. Brongers, Bouke van Spaendonck, Karel Wetzels, Jack F. M. Assendelft, Willem J. J. Dees, Marianne K. |
author_sort | van Dipten, Carola |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Guideline adherence in chronic kidney disease management is low, despite guideline implementation initiatives. Knowing general practitioners’ (GPs’) perspectives of management of early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the applicability of the national interdisciplinary guideline could support strategies to improve quality of care. METHOD: Qualitative focus group study with 27 GPs in the Netherlands. Three analysts open-coded and comparatively analysed the data. Mind-mapping sessions were performed after data-saturation. RESULTS: Five themes emerged: defining CKD, knowledge and awareness, patient-physician interaction, organisation of CKD care and value of the guideline. A key finding was the abstractness of the CKD concept. The GPs expressed various perspectives about defining CKD and interpreting estimated glomerular filtration rates. Views about clinical relevance influenced the decision-making, although factual knowledge seems lacking. Striving to inform well enough without creating anxiety and to explain suitably for the intellectual ability of the patient caused tension in the patient-physician interaction. Integration with cardiovascular disease-management programmes was mentioned as a way of implementing CKD care in the future. The guideline was perceived as a rough guide rather than a leading document. CONCLUSION: CKD is perceived as an abstract rather than a clinical concept. Abstractness plays a role in all formulated themes. Management of CKD patients in primary care is complex and is influenced by physician-bound considerations related to individual knowledge and perception of the importance of CKD. Strategies are needed to improve GPs’ understanding of the concept of CKD by education, a holistic approach to guidelines, and integration of CKD care into cardiovascular programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0736-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5991428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59914282018-06-21 General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study van Dipten, Carola van Berkel, Saskia de Grauw, Wim J. C. Scherpbier-de Haan, Nynke D. Brongers, Bouke van Spaendonck, Karel Wetzels, Jack F. M. Assendelft, Willem J. J. Dees, Marianne K. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Guideline adherence in chronic kidney disease management is low, despite guideline implementation initiatives. Knowing general practitioners’ (GPs’) perspectives of management of early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the applicability of the national interdisciplinary guideline could support strategies to improve quality of care. METHOD: Qualitative focus group study with 27 GPs in the Netherlands. Three analysts open-coded and comparatively analysed the data. Mind-mapping sessions were performed after data-saturation. RESULTS: Five themes emerged: defining CKD, knowledge and awareness, patient-physician interaction, organisation of CKD care and value of the guideline. A key finding was the abstractness of the CKD concept. The GPs expressed various perspectives about defining CKD and interpreting estimated glomerular filtration rates. Views about clinical relevance influenced the decision-making, although factual knowledge seems lacking. Striving to inform well enough without creating anxiety and to explain suitably for the intellectual ability of the patient caused tension in the patient-physician interaction. Integration with cardiovascular disease-management programmes was mentioned as a way of implementing CKD care in the future. The guideline was perceived as a rough guide rather than a leading document. CONCLUSION: CKD is perceived as an abstract rather than a clinical concept. Abstractness plays a role in all formulated themes. Management of CKD patients in primary care is complex and is influenced by physician-bound considerations related to individual knowledge and perception of the importance of CKD. Strategies are needed to improve GPs’ understanding of the concept of CKD by education, a holistic approach to guidelines, and integration of CKD care into cardiovascular programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0736-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5991428/ /pubmed/29875016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0736-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Dipten, Carola van Berkel, Saskia de Grauw, Wim J. C. Scherpbier-de Haan, Nynke D. Brongers, Bouke van Spaendonck, Karel Wetzels, Jack F. M. Assendelft, Willem J. J. Dees, Marianne K. General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study |
title | General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study |
title_full | General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study |
title_fullStr | General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study |
title_full_unstemmed | General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study |
title_short | General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study |
title_sort | general practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0736-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandiptencarola generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy AT vanberkelsaskia generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy AT degrauwwimjc generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy AT scherpbierdehaannynked generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy AT brongersbouke generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy AT vanspaendonckkarel generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy AT wetzelsjackfm generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy AT assendelftwillemjj generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy AT deesmariannek generalpractitionersperspectivesonmanagementofearlystagechronickidneydiseaseafocusgroupstudy |