Cargando…
Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
In this paper various types of electrodes for stimulation and recording activity of peripheral nerves for the control of neuroprosthetic limbs are reviewed. First, an overview of interface devices for (feedback-) controlled movement of a prosthetic device is given, after which the focus is on periph...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910705 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00350 |
_version_ | 1783330018264350720 |
---|---|
author | Rijnbeek, Emil H. Eleveld, Nick Olthuis, Wouter |
author_facet | Rijnbeek, Emil H. Eleveld, Nick Olthuis, Wouter |
author_sort | Rijnbeek, Emil H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper various types of electrodes for stimulation and recording activity of peripheral nerves for the control of neuroprosthetic limbs are reviewed. First, an overview of interface devices for (feedback-) controlled movement of a prosthetic device is given, after which the focus is on peripheral nervous system (PNS) electrodes. Important electrode properties, i.e., longevity and spatial resolution, are defined based upon the usability for neuroprostheses. The cuff electrode, longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes (LIFE), transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME), Utah slanted electrode array (USEA), and the regenerative electrode are discussed and assessed on their longevity and spatial resolution. The cuff electrode seems to be a promising electrode for the control of neuroprostheses in the near future, because it shows the best longevity and good spatial resolution and it has been used on human subjects in multiple studies. The other electrodes may be promising in the future, but further research on their longevity and spatial resolution is needed. A more quantitatively uniform study protocol used for all electrodes would allow for a proper comparison of recording and stimulation performance. For example, the discussed electrodes could be compared in a large in vivo study, using one uniform comparison protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5992394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59923942018-06-15 Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics Rijnbeek, Emil H. Eleveld, Nick Olthuis, Wouter Front Neurosci Neuroscience In this paper various types of electrodes for stimulation and recording activity of peripheral nerves for the control of neuroprosthetic limbs are reviewed. First, an overview of interface devices for (feedback-) controlled movement of a prosthetic device is given, after which the focus is on peripheral nervous system (PNS) electrodes. Important electrode properties, i.e., longevity and spatial resolution, are defined based upon the usability for neuroprostheses. The cuff electrode, longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes (LIFE), transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME), Utah slanted electrode array (USEA), and the regenerative electrode are discussed and assessed on their longevity and spatial resolution. The cuff electrode seems to be a promising electrode for the control of neuroprostheses in the near future, because it shows the best longevity and good spatial resolution and it has been used on human subjects in multiple studies. The other electrodes may be promising in the future, but further research on their longevity and spatial resolution is needed. A more quantitatively uniform study protocol used for all electrodes would allow for a proper comparison of recording and stimulation performance. For example, the discussed electrodes could be compared in a large in vivo study, using one uniform comparison protocol. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5992394/ /pubmed/29910705 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00350 Text en Copyright © 2018 Rijnbeek, Eleveld and Olthuis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Rijnbeek, Emil H. Eleveld, Nick Olthuis, Wouter Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics |
title | Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics |
title_full | Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics |
title_fullStr | Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics |
title_full_unstemmed | Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics |
title_short | Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics |
title_sort | update on peripheral nerve electrodes for closed-loop neuroprosthetics |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910705 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rijnbeekemilh updateonperipheralnerveelectrodesforclosedloopneuroprosthetics AT eleveldnick updateonperipheralnerveelectrodesforclosedloopneuroprosthetics AT olthuiswouter updateonperipheralnerveelectrodesforclosedloopneuroprosthetics |