Cargando…

Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics

In this paper various types of electrodes for stimulation and recording activity of peripheral nerves for the control of neuroprosthetic limbs are reviewed. First, an overview of interface devices for (feedback-) controlled movement of a prosthetic device is given, after which the focus is on periph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rijnbeek, Emil H., Eleveld, Nick, Olthuis, Wouter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910705
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00350
_version_ 1783330018264350720
author Rijnbeek, Emil H.
Eleveld, Nick
Olthuis, Wouter
author_facet Rijnbeek, Emil H.
Eleveld, Nick
Olthuis, Wouter
author_sort Rijnbeek, Emil H.
collection PubMed
description In this paper various types of electrodes for stimulation and recording activity of peripheral nerves for the control of neuroprosthetic limbs are reviewed. First, an overview of interface devices for (feedback-) controlled movement of a prosthetic device is given, after which the focus is on peripheral nervous system (PNS) electrodes. Important electrode properties, i.e., longevity and spatial resolution, are defined based upon the usability for neuroprostheses. The cuff electrode, longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes (LIFE), transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME), Utah slanted electrode array (USEA), and the regenerative electrode are discussed and assessed on their longevity and spatial resolution. The cuff electrode seems to be a promising electrode for the control of neuroprostheses in the near future, because it shows the best longevity and good spatial resolution and it has been used on human subjects in multiple studies. The other electrodes may be promising in the future, but further research on their longevity and spatial resolution is needed. A more quantitatively uniform study protocol used for all electrodes would allow for a proper comparison of recording and stimulation performance. For example, the discussed electrodes could be compared in a large in vivo study, using one uniform comparison protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5992394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59923942018-06-15 Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics Rijnbeek, Emil H. Eleveld, Nick Olthuis, Wouter Front Neurosci Neuroscience In this paper various types of electrodes for stimulation and recording activity of peripheral nerves for the control of neuroprosthetic limbs are reviewed. First, an overview of interface devices for (feedback-) controlled movement of a prosthetic device is given, after which the focus is on peripheral nervous system (PNS) electrodes. Important electrode properties, i.e., longevity and spatial resolution, are defined based upon the usability for neuroprostheses. The cuff electrode, longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes (LIFE), transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME), Utah slanted electrode array (USEA), and the regenerative electrode are discussed and assessed on their longevity and spatial resolution. The cuff electrode seems to be a promising electrode for the control of neuroprostheses in the near future, because it shows the best longevity and good spatial resolution and it has been used on human subjects in multiple studies. The other electrodes may be promising in the future, but further research on their longevity and spatial resolution is needed. A more quantitatively uniform study protocol used for all electrodes would allow for a proper comparison of recording and stimulation performance. For example, the discussed electrodes could be compared in a large in vivo study, using one uniform comparison protocol. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5992394/ /pubmed/29910705 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00350 Text en Copyright © 2018 Rijnbeek, Eleveld and Olthuis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Rijnbeek, Emil H.
Eleveld, Nick
Olthuis, Wouter
Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
title Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
title_full Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
title_fullStr Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
title_full_unstemmed Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
title_short Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
title_sort update on peripheral nerve electrodes for closed-loop neuroprosthetics
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910705
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00350
work_keys_str_mv AT rijnbeekemilh updateonperipheralnerveelectrodesforclosedloopneuroprosthetics
AT eleveldnick updateonperipheralnerveelectrodesforclosedloopneuroprosthetics
AT olthuiswouter updateonperipheralnerveelectrodesforclosedloopneuroprosthetics