Cargando…
Is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study
BACKGROUND: Much interest has been focussed on both maternal obesity and gestational weight gain (GWG), particularly on their role in influencing birth weight (BW). Several large reviews have reported that excessive GWG is associated with an increase in BW(.) However recent large, well-designed, ran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1843-9 |
_version_ | 1783330058861019136 |
---|---|
author | O’Higgins, Amy C. Doolan, Anne McCartan, Thomas Mullaney, Laura O’Connor, Clare Turner, Michael J. |
author_facet | O’Higgins, Amy C. Doolan, Anne McCartan, Thomas Mullaney, Laura O’Connor, Clare Turner, Michael J. |
author_sort | O’Higgins, Amy C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Much interest has been focussed on both maternal obesity and gestational weight gain (GWG), particularly on their role in influencing birth weight (BW). Several large reviews have reported that excessive GWG is associated with an increase in BW(.) However recent large, well-designed, randomized controlled trials studying interventions aimed at reducing GWG have all consistently failed to show a reduction in BW despite achieving a reduction in GWG. The aim of this longitudinal prospective study was to examine the relationship between GWG and birth weight in women where GWG and Body Mass Index (BMI) were measured accurately in a strictly standardized way. METHODS: Women were enrolled at their convenience before 18 weeks gestation. Height and weight were measured accurately at the first antenatal visit and BMI calculated. Maternal weight was measured again after 37 weeks gestation. The weight of the baby was measured at birth. Relationships were tested using linear regression analysis, chi-squared tests and t-tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 522 women studied, the mean BMI was 25.3 kg/m(2) and 15.7% were obese. The mean BW at term was 3576 g (2160–5120) and 2.7% (n = 14) weighed ≥4500 g. The mean GWG overall was 12.3 kg (4.6 to 28.4) and GWG decreased as BMI increased. The mean GWG was less in obese women, at 8.7 kg (− 4.6 to 23.4), compared to non-obese,13.0 kg (0.6–28.4) (p < 0.001). Mean BW in obese women was 3630 g vs 3565 g in non-obese (p = 0.27). The total GWG correlated positively with BW (p < 0.001). When BW was subtracted from total GWG, GWG no longer correlated with BW (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The positive correlation between GWG in pregnancy and BW can be accounted for by the contribution of fetal weight to GWG antenatally without a contribution from increased maternal adiposity. There was a wide range of BW irrespective of the degree of GWG and obese women had a lower GWG than non-obese women. These findings help explain why Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) designed to reduce GWG have failed to decrease BW and suggest there is no causative link between excessive GWG and increased BW. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5992630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59926302018-06-21 Is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study O’Higgins, Amy C. Doolan, Anne McCartan, Thomas Mullaney, Laura O’Connor, Clare Turner, Michael J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Much interest has been focussed on both maternal obesity and gestational weight gain (GWG), particularly on their role in influencing birth weight (BW). Several large reviews have reported that excessive GWG is associated with an increase in BW(.) However recent large, well-designed, randomized controlled trials studying interventions aimed at reducing GWG have all consistently failed to show a reduction in BW despite achieving a reduction in GWG. The aim of this longitudinal prospective study was to examine the relationship between GWG and birth weight in women where GWG and Body Mass Index (BMI) were measured accurately in a strictly standardized way. METHODS: Women were enrolled at their convenience before 18 weeks gestation. Height and weight were measured accurately at the first antenatal visit and BMI calculated. Maternal weight was measured again after 37 weeks gestation. The weight of the baby was measured at birth. Relationships were tested using linear regression analysis, chi-squared tests and t-tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 522 women studied, the mean BMI was 25.3 kg/m(2) and 15.7% were obese. The mean BW at term was 3576 g (2160–5120) and 2.7% (n = 14) weighed ≥4500 g. The mean GWG overall was 12.3 kg (4.6 to 28.4) and GWG decreased as BMI increased. The mean GWG was less in obese women, at 8.7 kg (− 4.6 to 23.4), compared to non-obese,13.0 kg (0.6–28.4) (p < 0.001). Mean BW in obese women was 3630 g vs 3565 g in non-obese (p = 0.27). The total GWG correlated positively with BW (p < 0.001). When BW was subtracted from total GWG, GWG no longer correlated with BW (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The positive correlation between GWG in pregnancy and BW can be accounted for by the contribution of fetal weight to GWG antenatally without a contribution from increased maternal adiposity. There was a wide range of BW irrespective of the degree of GWG and obese women had a lower GWG than non-obese women. These findings help explain why Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) designed to reduce GWG have failed to decrease BW and suggest there is no causative link between excessive GWG and increased BW. BioMed Central 2018-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5992630/ /pubmed/29879924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1843-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article O’Higgins, Amy C. Doolan, Anne McCartan, Thomas Mullaney, Laura O’Connor, Clare Turner, Michael J. Is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study |
title | Is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study |
title_full | Is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study |
title_fullStr | Is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study |
title_short | Is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study |
title_sort | is birth weight the major confounding factor in the study of gestational weight gain?: an observational cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1843-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohigginsamyc isbirthweightthemajorconfoundingfactorinthestudyofgestationalweightgainanobservationalcohortstudy AT doolananne isbirthweightthemajorconfoundingfactorinthestudyofgestationalweightgainanobservationalcohortstudy AT mccartanthomas isbirthweightthemajorconfoundingfactorinthestudyofgestationalweightgainanobservationalcohortstudy AT mullaneylaura isbirthweightthemajorconfoundingfactorinthestudyofgestationalweightgainanobservationalcohortstudy AT oconnorclare isbirthweightthemajorconfoundingfactorinthestudyofgestationalweightgainanobservationalcohortstudy AT turnermichaelj isbirthweightthemajorconfoundingfactorinthestudyofgestationalweightgainanobservationalcohortstudy |