Cargando…
Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis
BACKGROUND: People with psychotic illness suffer from reduced quality of life and often from an insufficient level of social inclusion. These variables are associated with several negative outcomes, such as higher neuro-cognitive deficits, negative symptoms, internalised stigma, increased cardiovasc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1728-5 |
_version_ | 1783330067463536640 |
---|---|
author | Mazzi, Fausto Baccari, Flavia Mungai, Francesco Ciambellini, Manuela Brescancin, Lisa Starace, Fabrizio |
author_facet | Mazzi, Fausto Baccari, Flavia Mungai, Francesco Ciambellini, Manuela Brescancin, Lisa Starace, Fabrizio |
author_sort | Mazzi, Fausto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: People with psychotic illness suffer from reduced quality of life and often from an insufficient level of social inclusion. These variables are associated with several negative outcomes, such as higher neuro-cognitive deficits, negative symptoms, internalised stigma, increased cardiovascular risk and, most importantly, excess mortality. To date, only a minority of social interventions in psychosis have been investigated. Since 2011, the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Modena introduced the “Social Point” program, which provides social inclusion interventions to promote active social participation for patients suffering from severe mental illness. The aim of this study was to assess whether a social inclusion intervention is associated with better outcomes in terms of personal and social recovery, with particular reference to the areas of social functioning and activity, and subjective dimensions such as self-esteem, self-stigma and perceived quality of life. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was adopted to compare 30 subjects, selected at the completion of “Social Point” program, with a group of subjects, matched for socio-demographic and clinical features, selected from a wait list for “Social Point”. All subjects were evaluated by means of instruments assessing: level of disability, level of functioning, severity of psychopathology, self-esteem, internalised stigma and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, the results of the study suggest that social inclusion interventions may be effective in people suffering from non-affective psychosis. A dose-effect relationship was also found between higher number of activities per patient and better outcomes within both social and psychopathological domains. However, due to the cross-sectional design of the study no definitive causality can be inferred. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial interventions promoting social inclusion are likely to represent an effective approach to improve personal and social recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5992655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59926552018-06-21 Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis Mazzi, Fausto Baccari, Flavia Mungai, Francesco Ciambellini, Manuela Brescancin, Lisa Starace, Fabrizio BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: People with psychotic illness suffer from reduced quality of life and often from an insufficient level of social inclusion. These variables are associated with several negative outcomes, such as higher neuro-cognitive deficits, negative symptoms, internalised stigma, increased cardiovascular risk and, most importantly, excess mortality. To date, only a minority of social interventions in psychosis have been investigated. Since 2011, the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Modena introduced the “Social Point” program, which provides social inclusion interventions to promote active social participation for patients suffering from severe mental illness. The aim of this study was to assess whether a social inclusion intervention is associated with better outcomes in terms of personal and social recovery, with particular reference to the areas of social functioning and activity, and subjective dimensions such as self-esteem, self-stigma and perceived quality of life. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was adopted to compare 30 subjects, selected at the completion of “Social Point” program, with a group of subjects, matched for socio-demographic and clinical features, selected from a wait list for “Social Point”. All subjects were evaluated by means of instruments assessing: level of disability, level of functioning, severity of psychopathology, self-esteem, internalised stigma and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, the results of the study suggest that social inclusion interventions may be effective in people suffering from non-affective psychosis. A dose-effect relationship was also found between higher number of activities per patient and better outcomes within both social and psychopathological domains. However, due to the cross-sectional design of the study no definitive causality can be inferred. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial interventions promoting social inclusion are likely to represent an effective approach to improve personal and social recovery. BioMed Central 2018-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5992655/ /pubmed/29879925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1728-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mazzi, Fausto Baccari, Flavia Mungai, Francesco Ciambellini, Manuela Brescancin, Lisa Starace, Fabrizio Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis |
title | Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis |
title_full | Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis |
title_short | Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis |
title_sort | effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1728-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzifausto effectivenessofasocialinclusionprograminpeoplewithnonaffectivepsychosis AT baccariflavia effectivenessofasocialinclusionprograminpeoplewithnonaffectivepsychosis AT mungaifrancesco effectivenessofasocialinclusionprograminpeoplewithnonaffectivepsychosis AT ciambellinimanuela effectivenessofasocialinclusionprograminpeoplewithnonaffectivepsychosis AT brescancinlisa effectivenessofasocialinclusionprograminpeoplewithnonaffectivepsychosis AT staracefabrizio effectivenessofasocialinclusionprograminpeoplewithnonaffectivepsychosis |