Cargando…

Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans

BACKGROUND: Deep breast pain during lactation, with or without accompanying nipple pain and soreness continues to be anecdotally linked to infection by Candia albicans despite lack of robust evidence in the literature that Candida albicans is the cause of women’s breast symptoms. METHODS: A case-con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaski, Kirsti, Kvist, Linda J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0167-8
_version_ 1783330095516090368
author Kaski, Kirsti
Kvist, Linda J.
author_facet Kaski, Kirsti
Kvist, Linda J.
author_sort Kaski, Kirsti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep breast pain during lactation, with or without accompanying nipple pain and soreness continues to be anecdotally linked to infection by Candia albicans despite lack of robust evidence in the literature that Candida albicans is the cause of women’s breast symptoms. METHODS: A case-control study of breastfeeding women in Sweden with (n 35) and without (n 35) symptoms that may be attributable to Candida albicans was carried out. The symptoms were radiating, burning and penetrating or non-penetrating breast pain with or without associated nipple pain during or after breastfeeding. The primary aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that breastfeeding women with symptoms commonly associated with Candida albicans infection will have a growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk significantly more often than women without these symptoms. A secondary aim was comparison of breastfeeding self-efficacy, measured by the BSES-SF (Breastfeeding Self Efficacy Scale –Short Form), between cases and controls. RESULTS: None of the women in the control group and eight of the women in the case group showed a growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk (p <  0.01), which confirms the hypothesis. There were no statistically significant differences in severity or type of symptoms between those in the case group with and without growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk. Results of the BSES-SF measurement showed no statistically significant differences between cases and controls. However, when analyses were stratified for parity, multiparous controls showed statistically significant higher scores for breastfeeding self-efficacy than multiparous cases. CONCLUSIONS: Neither clinical symptoms nor microbial cultivation appear to be reliable means for making a diagnosis of Candida albicans infection of the breast. Skilled breastfeeding consultants should offer support and help with positioning, attachment and identification of physical impediments to successful breastfeeding. Professionals should be aware that it is possible that uncertainty in the breastfeeding situation may to some extent account for mothers’ breast symptoms. The ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number) identity for this case-control study is ISRCTN88839993. The study was retrospectively registered on 30 November 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5992756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59927562018-07-05 Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans Kaski, Kirsti Kvist, Linda J. Int Breastfeed J Research BACKGROUND: Deep breast pain during lactation, with or without accompanying nipple pain and soreness continues to be anecdotally linked to infection by Candia albicans despite lack of robust evidence in the literature that Candida albicans is the cause of women’s breast symptoms. METHODS: A case-control study of breastfeeding women in Sweden with (n 35) and without (n 35) symptoms that may be attributable to Candida albicans was carried out. The symptoms were radiating, burning and penetrating or non-penetrating breast pain with or without associated nipple pain during or after breastfeeding. The primary aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that breastfeeding women with symptoms commonly associated with Candida albicans infection will have a growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk significantly more often than women without these symptoms. A secondary aim was comparison of breastfeeding self-efficacy, measured by the BSES-SF (Breastfeeding Self Efficacy Scale –Short Form), between cases and controls. RESULTS: None of the women in the control group and eight of the women in the case group showed a growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk (p <  0.01), which confirms the hypothesis. There were no statistically significant differences in severity or type of symptoms between those in the case group with and without growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk. Results of the BSES-SF measurement showed no statistically significant differences between cases and controls. However, when analyses were stratified for parity, multiparous controls showed statistically significant higher scores for breastfeeding self-efficacy than multiparous cases. CONCLUSIONS: Neither clinical symptoms nor microbial cultivation appear to be reliable means for making a diagnosis of Candida albicans infection of the breast. Skilled breastfeeding consultants should offer support and help with positioning, attachment and identification of physical impediments to successful breastfeeding. Professionals should be aware that it is possible that uncertainty in the breastfeeding situation may to some extent account for mothers’ breast symptoms. The ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number) identity for this case-control study is ISRCTN88839993. The study was retrospectively registered on 30 November 2016. BioMed Central 2018-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5992756/ /pubmed/29977322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0167-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kaski, Kirsti
Kvist, Linda J.
Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_full Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_fullStr Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_full_unstemmed Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_short Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_sort deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in sweden investigating the role of candida albicans
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0167-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kaskikirsti deepbreastpainduringlactationacasecontrolstudyinswedeninvestigatingtheroleofcandidaalbicans
AT kvistlindaj deepbreastpainduringlactationacasecontrolstudyinswedeninvestigatingtheroleofcandidaalbicans