Cargando…

Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity

BACKGROUND: Older adults spend more time sitting than any other age group, contributing to poor health outcomes. Effective behavioral interventions are needed to encourage less sitting among older adults, specifically those with obesity, but these programs must be acceptable to the target population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matson, Theresa E., Renz, Anne D., Takemoto, Michelle L., McClure, Jennifer B., Rosenberg, Dori E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5616-1
_version_ 1783330114260434944
author Matson, Theresa E.
Renz, Anne D.
Takemoto, Michelle L.
McClure, Jennifer B.
Rosenberg, Dori E.
author_facet Matson, Theresa E.
Renz, Anne D.
Takemoto, Michelle L.
McClure, Jennifer B.
Rosenberg, Dori E.
author_sort Matson, Theresa E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older adults spend more time sitting than any other age group, contributing to poor health outcomes. Effective behavioral interventions are needed to encourage less sitting among older adults, specifically those with obesity, but these programs must be acceptable to the target population. We explored participant acceptance of a theory-based and technology-enhanced sitting reduction intervention designed for older adults (I-STAND). METHODS: The 12-week I-STAND intervention consisted of 6 health coaching contacts, a study workbook, a Jawbone UP band to remind participants to take breaks from sitting, and feedback on sitting behaviors (generated from wearing an activPAL device for 7 days at the beginning and mid-point of the study). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 participants after they completed the intervention. Interview transcripts were iteratively coded by a team, and thematic analysis was used to identify and refine emerging themes. RESULTS: Overall, participants were satisfied with the I-STAND intervention, thought the sedentary behavior goals of the intervention were easy to incorporate, and found the technologies to be helpful additions to (but not substitutes for) health coaching. Barriers to standing more included poor health, ingrained sedentary habits, lack of motivation to change sedentary behavior, and social norms that dictate when it is appropriate to sit/stand. Facilitators to standing more included increased awareness of sitting, a sense of accountability, daily activities that involved standing, social support, and changing ways of interacting in the home environment. Participants reported that the intervention improved physical health, increased energy, increased readiness to engage in physical activity, improved mood, and reduced stress. CONCLUSIONS: The technology-enhanced sedentary behavior reduction intervention was acceptable, easy to incorporate, and had a positive perceived health impact on older adults with obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The I-STAND study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT02692560) February 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5616-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5992825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59928252018-07-05 Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity Matson, Theresa E. Renz, Anne D. Takemoto, Michelle L. McClure, Jennifer B. Rosenberg, Dori E. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Older adults spend more time sitting than any other age group, contributing to poor health outcomes. Effective behavioral interventions are needed to encourage less sitting among older adults, specifically those with obesity, but these programs must be acceptable to the target population. We explored participant acceptance of a theory-based and technology-enhanced sitting reduction intervention designed for older adults (I-STAND). METHODS: The 12-week I-STAND intervention consisted of 6 health coaching contacts, a study workbook, a Jawbone UP band to remind participants to take breaks from sitting, and feedback on sitting behaviors (generated from wearing an activPAL device for 7 days at the beginning and mid-point of the study). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 participants after they completed the intervention. Interview transcripts were iteratively coded by a team, and thematic analysis was used to identify and refine emerging themes. RESULTS: Overall, participants were satisfied with the I-STAND intervention, thought the sedentary behavior goals of the intervention were easy to incorporate, and found the technologies to be helpful additions to (but not substitutes for) health coaching. Barriers to standing more included poor health, ingrained sedentary habits, lack of motivation to change sedentary behavior, and social norms that dictate when it is appropriate to sit/stand. Facilitators to standing more included increased awareness of sitting, a sense of accountability, daily activities that involved standing, social support, and changing ways of interacting in the home environment. Participants reported that the intervention improved physical health, increased energy, increased readiness to engage in physical activity, improved mood, and reduced stress. CONCLUSIONS: The technology-enhanced sedentary behavior reduction intervention was acceptable, easy to incorporate, and had a positive perceived health impact on older adults with obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The I-STAND study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT02692560) February 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5616-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5992825/ /pubmed/29879948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5616-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matson, Theresa E.
Renz, Anne D.
Takemoto, Michelle L.
McClure, Jennifer B.
Rosenberg, Dori E.
Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity
title Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity
title_full Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity
title_fullStr Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity
title_short Acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity
title_sort acceptability of a sitting reduction intervention for older adults with obesity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5616-1
work_keys_str_mv AT matsontheresae acceptabilityofasittingreductioninterventionforolderadultswithobesity
AT renzanned acceptabilityofasittingreductioninterventionforolderadultswithobesity
AT takemotomichellel acceptabilityofasittingreductioninterventionforolderadultswithobesity
AT mcclurejenniferb acceptabilityofasittingreductioninterventionforolderadultswithobesity
AT rosenbergdorie acceptabilityofasittingreductioninterventionforolderadultswithobesity