Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is associated with high mortality when detected at a later stage. There is a paucity of studies from low and middle income countries to support the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We aim to analyze the c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0104-0 |
_version_ | 1783330114543550464 |
---|---|
author | Melnitchouk, Nelya Soeteman, Djøra I. Davids, Jennifer S. Fields, Adam Cohen, Joshua Noubary, Farzad Lukashenko, Andrey Kolesnik, Olena O. Freund, Karen M. |
author_facet | Melnitchouk, Nelya Soeteman, Djøra I. Davids, Jennifer S. Fields, Adam Cohen, Joshua Noubary, Farzad Lukashenko, Andrey Kolesnik, Olena O. Freund, Karen M. |
author_sort | Melnitchouk, Nelya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is associated with high mortality when detected at a later stage. There is a paucity of studies from low and middle income countries to support the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We aim to analyze the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening compared to no screening in Ukraine, a lower-middle income country. METHODS: We developed a deterministic Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer screening strategies [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) every year, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FOBT every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years] compared to no screening. We modeled outcomes in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. We performed sensitivity analyses on treatment adherence, test characteristics and costs. Analyses were conducted from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. RESULTS: The base-case lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis showed that all three screening strategies were cost saving compared to no screening, and among the three strategies, colonoscopy every 10 years was the dominant strategy compared to no screening with standard adherence to treatment. When decreased adherence to treatment was modeled, colonoscopy every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $843 per QALY compared with no screening. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that colorectal cancer screening can save money and improve health compared to no screening in Ukraine. Colonoscopy every 10 years is superior to the other screening modalities evaluated in this study. This knowledge can be used to concentrate efforts on developing a national screening program in Ukraine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5992826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59928262018-07-05 Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine Melnitchouk, Nelya Soeteman, Djøra I. Davids, Jennifer S. Fields, Adam Cohen, Joshua Noubary, Farzad Lukashenko, Andrey Kolesnik, Olena O. Freund, Karen M. Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is associated with high mortality when detected at a later stage. There is a paucity of studies from low and middle income countries to support the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We aim to analyze the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening compared to no screening in Ukraine, a lower-middle income country. METHODS: We developed a deterministic Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer screening strategies [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) every year, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FOBT every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years] compared to no screening. We modeled outcomes in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. We performed sensitivity analyses on treatment adherence, test characteristics and costs. Analyses were conducted from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. RESULTS: The base-case lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis showed that all three screening strategies were cost saving compared to no screening, and among the three strategies, colonoscopy every 10 years was the dominant strategy compared to no screening with standard adherence to treatment. When decreased adherence to treatment was modeled, colonoscopy every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $843 per QALY compared with no screening. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that colorectal cancer screening can save money and improve health compared to no screening in Ukraine. Colonoscopy every 10 years is superior to the other screening modalities evaluated in this study. This knowledge can be used to concentrate efforts on developing a national screening program in Ukraine. BioMed Central 2018-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5992826/ /pubmed/29977160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0104-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Melnitchouk, Nelya Soeteman, Djøra I. Davids, Jennifer S. Fields, Adam Cohen, Joshua Noubary, Farzad Lukashenko, Andrey Kolesnik, Olena O. Freund, Karen M. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine |
title | Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in ukraine |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0104-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT melnitchouknelya costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine AT soetemandjørai costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine AT davidsjennifers costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine AT fieldsadam costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine AT cohenjoshua costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine AT noubaryfarzad costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine AT lukashenkoandrey costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine AT kolesnikolenao costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine AT freundkarenm costeffectivenessofcolorectalcancerscreeninginukraine |