Cargando…

Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Penn Facial Pain Scale (Penn-FPS) was originally developed as a supplemental module to the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Index (BPI-PII) in order to fully assess the impact of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) pain on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Symonds, Tara, Randall, Jason A, Hoffman, Deborah L, Zakrzewska, Joanna M, Gehringer, William, Lee, John YK
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892203
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S152958
_version_ 1783330162558894080
author Symonds, Tara
Randall, Jason A
Hoffman, Deborah L
Zakrzewska, Joanna M
Gehringer, William
Lee, John YK
author_facet Symonds, Tara
Randall, Jason A
Hoffman, Deborah L
Zakrzewska, Joanna M
Gehringer, William
Lee, John YK
author_sort Symonds, Tara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Penn Facial Pain Scale (Penn-FPS) was originally developed as a supplemental module to the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Index (BPI-PII) in order to fully assess the impact of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) pain on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The current objective is to create and establish the content validity of a new stand-alone version of the measure, the Penn-FPS-Revised (Penn-FPS-R). METHODS: Twenty participants (15 USA and 5 UK) with confirmed TN engaged in concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews. These semi-structured interviews allowed participants to spontaneously describe the ways in which TN impacts on HRQoL and report on the extent to which the Penn-FPS and BPI-PII measure concepts are most relevant to them. Participants were also asked to report on the suitability of the instructions, recall period, and response options. RESULTS: Concept elicitation revealed nine themes involving TN restrictions on daily activities and HRQoL, including: “talking,” “self-care,” “eating,” “eating hard foods/chewing foods,” “daily activities,” “activities with temperature change,” “touching,” “mood,” and “relationships.” Cognitive debriefing confirmed that all of the Penn-FPS concepts and some of the BPI-PII concepts (“mood,” “general activities,” and “relations with others”) were relevant, although some items required edits to better capture individuals’ experiences. The impact of temperature and/or weather on activities was also identified as an important concept that is not captured by the Penn-FPS or BPI-PII. Participants confirmed the acceptability of recall period, instructions, and response options. Results from the interviews were applied to create the Penn-FPS-R, a new brief outcome measure that assesses the impacts of TN most important to patients. CONCLUSION: The Penn-FPS-R is a new 12-item HRQoL outcome measure with content validity that can be used to assess and monitor the impact of TN treatment interventions in both clinical practice and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5993035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59930352018-06-11 Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised Symonds, Tara Randall, Jason A Hoffman, Deborah L Zakrzewska, Joanna M Gehringer, William Lee, John YK J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Penn Facial Pain Scale (Penn-FPS) was originally developed as a supplemental module to the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Index (BPI-PII) in order to fully assess the impact of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) pain on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The current objective is to create and establish the content validity of a new stand-alone version of the measure, the Penn-FPS-Revised (Penn-FPS-R). METHODS: Twenty participants (15 USA and 5 UK) with confirmed TN engaged in concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews. These semi-structured interviews allowed participants to spontaneously describe the ways in which TN impacts on HRQoL and report on the extent to which the Penn-FPS and BPI-PII measure concepts are most relevant to them. Participants were also asked to report on the suitability of the instructions, recall period, and response options. RESULTS: Concept elicitation revealed nine themes involving TN restrictions on daily activities and HRQoL, including: “talking,” “self-care,” “eating,” “eating hard foods/chewing foods,” “daily activities,” “activities with temperature change,” “touching,” “mood,” and “relationships.” Cognitive debriefing confirmed that all of the Penn-FPS concepts and some of the BPI-PII concepts (“mood,” “general activities,” and “relations with others”) were relevant, although some items required edits to better capture individuals’ experiences. The impact of temperature and/or weather on activities was also identified as an important concept that is not captured by the Penn-FPS or BPI-PII. Participants confirmed the acceptability of recall period, instructions, and response options. Results from the interviews were applied to create the Penn-FPS-R, a new brief outcome measure that assesses the impacts of TN most important to patients. CONCLUSION: The Penn-FPS-R is a new 12-item HRQoL outcome measure with content validity that can be used to assess and monitor the impact of TN treatment interventions in both clinical practice and research. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5993035/ /pubmed/29892203 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S152958 Text en © 2018 Symonds et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Symonds, Tara
Randall, Jason A
Hoffman, Deborah L
Zakrzewska, Joanna M
Gehringer, William
Lee, John YK
Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised
title Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised
title_full Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised
title_fullStr Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised
title_short Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised
title_sort measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the penn facial pain scale-revised
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892203
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S152958
work_keys_str_mv AT symondstara measuringtheimpactoftrigeminalneuralgiapainthepennfacialpainscalerevised
AT randalljasona measuringtheimpactoftrigeminalneuralgiapainthepennfacialpainscalerevised
AT hoffmandeborahl measuringtheimpactoftrigeminalneuralgiapainthepennfacialpainscalerevised
AT zakrzewskajoannam measuringtheimpactoftrigeminalneuralgiapainthepennfacialpainscalerevised
AT gehringerwilliam measuringtheimpactoftrigeminalneuralgiapainthepennfacialpainscalerevised
AT leejohnyk measuringtheimpactoftrigeminalneuralgiapainthepennfacialpainscalerevised