Cargando…

Soil Moisture‐Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models

The land surface controls the partitioning of water and energy fluxes and therefore plays a crucial role in the climate system. The coupling between soil moisture and air temperature, in particular, has been shown to affect the severity and occurrence of temperature extremes and heat waves. Here we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gevaert, A. I., Miralles, D. G., de Jeu, R. A. M., Schellekens, J., Dolman, A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29938143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027346
_version_ 1783330202755006464
author Gevaert, A. I.
Miralles, D. G.
de Jeu, R. A. M.
Schellekens, J.
Dolman, A. J.
author_facet Gevaert, A. I.
Miralles, D. G.
de Jeu, R. A. M.
Schellekens, J.
Dolman, A. J.
author_sort Gevaert, A. I.
collection PubMed
description The land surface controls the partitioning of water and energy fluxes and therefore plays a crucial role in the climate system. The coupling between soil moisture and air temperature, in particular, has been shown to affect the severity and occurrence of temperature extremes and heat waves. Here we study soil moisture‐temperature coupling in five land surface models, focusing on the terrestrial segment of the coupling in the warm season. All models are run off‐line over a common period with identical atmospheric forcing data, in order to allow differences in the results to be attributed to the models' partitioning of energy and water fluxes. Coupling is calculated according to two semiempirical metrics, and results are compared to observational flux tower data. Results show that the locations of the global hot spots of soil moisture‐temperature coupling are similar across all models and for both metrics. In agreement with previous studies, these areas are located in transitional climate regimes. The magnitude and local patterns of model coupling, however, can vary considerably. Model coupling fields are compared to tower data, bearing in mind the limitations in the geographical distribution of flux towers and the differences in representative area of models and in situ data. Nevertheless, model coupling correlates in space with the tower‐based results (r = 0.5–0.7), with the multimodel mean performing similarly to the best‐performing model. Intermodel differences are also found in the evaporative fractions and may relate to errors in model parameterizations and ancillary data of soil and vegetation characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5993230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59932302018-06-20 Soil Moisture‐Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models Gevaert, A. I. Miralles, D. G. de Jeu, R. A. M. Schellekens, J. Dolman, A. J. J Geophys Res Atmos Research Articles The land surface controls the partitioning of water and energy fluxes and therefore plays a crucial role in the climate system. The coupling between soil moisture and air temperature, in particular, has been shown to affect the severity and occurrence of temperature extremes and heat waves. Here we study soil moisture‐temperature coupling in five land surface models, focusing on the terrestrial segment of the coupling in the warm season. All models are run off‐line over a common period with identical atmospheric forcing data, in order to allow differences in the results to be attributed to the models' partitioning of energy and water fluxes. Coupling is calculated according to two semiempirical metrics, and results are compared to observational flux tower data. Results show that the locations of the global hot spots of soil moisture‐temperature coupling are similar across all models and for both metrics. In agreement with previous studies, these areas are located in transitional climate regimes. The magnitude and local patterns of model coupling, however, can vary considerably. Model coupling fields are compared to tower data, bearing in mind the limitations in the geographical distribution of flux towers and the differences in representative area of models and in situ data. Nevertheless, model coupling correlates in space with the tower‐based results (r = 0.5–0.7), with the multimodel mean performing similarly to the best‐performing model. Intermodel differences are also found in the evaporative fractions and may relate to errors in model parameterizations and ancillary data of soil and vegetation characteristics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-01 2018-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5993230/ /pubmed/29938143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027346 Text en ©2017. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Gevaert, A. I.
Miralles, D. G.
de Jeu, R. A. M.
Schellekens, J.
Dolman, A. J.
Soil Moisture‐Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models
title Soil Moisture‐Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models
title_full Soil Moisture‐Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models
title_fullStr Soil Moisture‐Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models
title_full_unstemmed Soil Moisture‐Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models
title_short Soil Moisture‐Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models
title_sort soil moisture‐temperature coupling in a set of land surface models
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29938143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027346
work_keys_str_mv AT gevaertai soilmoisturetemperaturecouplinginasetoflandsurfacemodels
AT mirallesdg soilmoisturetemperaturecouplinginasetoflandsurfacemodels
AT dejeuram soilmoisturetemperaturecouplinginasetoflandsurfacemodels
AT schellekensj soilmoisturetemperaturecouplinginasetoflandsurfacemodels
AT dolmanaj soilmoisturetemperaturecouplinginasetoflandsurfacemodels