Cargando…

Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being

Mobility is a key aspect of active ageing enabling participation and autonomy into later life. Remaining active brings multiple physical but also social benefits leading to higher levels of well-being. With globally increasing levels of urbanisation alongside demographic shifts meaning in many parts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cinderby, Steve, Cambridge, Howard, Attuyer, Katia, Bevan, Mark, Croucher, Karen, Gilroy, Rose, Swallow, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z
_version_ 1783330261948170240
author Cinderby, Steve
Cambridge, Howard
Attuyer, Katia
Bevan, Mark
Croucher, Karen
Gilroy, Rose
Swallow, David
author_facet Cinderby, Steve
Cambridge, Howard
Attuyer, Katia
Bevan, Mark
Croucher, Karen
Gilroy, Rose
Swallow, David
author_sort Cinderby, Steve
collection PubMed
description Mobility is a key aspect of active ageing enabling participation and autonomy into later life. Remaining active brings multiple physical but also social benefits leading to higher levels of well-being. With globally increasing levels of urbanisation alongside demographic shifts meaning in many parts of the world this urban population will be older people, the challenge is how cities should evolve to enable so-called active ageing. This paper reports on a co-design study with 117 participants investigating the interaction of existing urban spaces and infrastructure on mobility and well-being for older residents (aged 55 + years) in three cities. A mixed method approach was trialled to identify locations beneficial to subjective well-being and participant-led solutions to urban mobility challenges. Spatial analysis was used to identify key underlying factors in locations and infrastructure that promoted or compromised mobility and well-being for participants. Co-designed solutions were assessed for acceptability or co-benefits amongst a wider cross-section of urban residents (n = 233) using online and face-to-face surveys in each conurbation. Our analysis identified three critical intersecting and interacting thematic problems for urban mobility amongst older people: The quality of physical infrastructure; issues around the delivery, governance and quality of urban systems and services; and the attitudes and behaviors of individuals that older people encounter. This identified complexity reinforces the need for policy responses that may not necessarily involve design or retrofit measures, but instead might challenge perceptions and behaviors of use and access to urban space. Our co-design results further highlight that solutions need to move beyond the generic and placeless, instead embedding specific locally relevant solutions in inherently geographical spaces, populations and processes to ensure they relate to the intricacies of place. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5993707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59937072018-07-04 Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being Cinderby, Steve Cambridge, Howard Attuyer, Katia Bevan, Mark Croucher, Karen Gilroy, Rose Swallow, David J Urban Health Article Mobility is a key aspect of active ageing enabling participation and autonomy into later life. Remaining active brings multiple physical but also social benefits leading to higher levels of well-being. With globally increasing levels of urbanisation alongside demographic shifts meaning in many parts of the world this urban population will be older people, the challenge is how cities should evolve to enable so-called active ageing. This paper reports on a co-design study with 117 participants investigating the interaction of existing urban spaces and infrastructure on mobility and well-being for older residents (aged 55 + years) in three cities. A mixed method approach was trialled to identify locations beneficial to subjective well-being and participant-led solutions to urban mobility challenges. Spatial analysis was used to identify key underlying factors in locations and infrastructure that promoted or compromised mobility and well-being for participants. Co-designed solutions were assessed for acceptability or co-benefits amongst a wider cross-section of urban residents (n = 233) using online and face-to-face surveys in each conurbation. Our analysis identified three critical intersecting and interacting thematic problems for urban mobility amongst older people: The quality of physical infrastructure; issues around the delivery, governance and quality of urban systems and services; and the attitudes and behaviors of individuals that older people encounter. This identified complexity reinforces the need for policy responses that may not necessarily involve design or retrofit measures, but instead might challenge perceptions and behaviors of use and access to urban space. Our co-design results further highlight that solutions need to move beyond the generic and placeless, instead embedding specific locally relevant solutions in inherently geographical spaces, populations and processes to ensure they relate to the intricacies of place. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-04-11 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5993707/ /pubmed/29644534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Cinderby, Steve
Cambridge, Howard
Attuyer, Katia
Bevan, Mark
Croucher, Karen
Gilroy, Rose
Swallow, David
Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being
title Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being
title_full Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being
title_fullStr Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being
title_full_unstemmed Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being
title_short Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being
title_sort co-designing urban living solutions to improve older people’s mobility and well-being
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cinderbysteve codesigningurbanlivingsolutionstoimproveolderpeoplesmobilityandwellbeing
AT cambridgehoward codesigningurbanlivingsolutionstoimproveolderpeoplesmobilityandwellbeing
AT attuyerkatia codesigningurbanlivingsolutionstoimproveolderpeoplesmobilityandwellbeing
AT bevanmark codesigningurbanlivingsolutionstoimproveolderpeoplesmobilityandwellbeing
AT croucherkaren codesigningurbanlivingsolutionstoimproveolderpeoplesmobilityandwellbeing
AT gilroyrose codesigningurbanlivingsolutionstoimproveolderpeoplesmobilityandwellbeing
AT swallowdavid codesigningurbanlivingsolutionstoimproveolderpeoplesmobilityandwellbeing