Cargando…
Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour
Many ecological- and individual-level analyses of voting behaviour use multiple regressions with a considerable number of independent variables but few discussions of their results pay any attention to the potential impact of inter-relationships among those independent variables—do they confound the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6 |
_version_ | 1783330295536156672 |
---|---|
author | Johnston, Ron Jones, Kelvyn Manley, David |
author_facet | Johnston, Ron Jones, Kelvyn Manley, David |
author_sort | Johnston, Ron |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many ecological- and individual-level analyses of voting behaviour use multiple regressions with a considerable number of independent variables but few discussions of their results pay any attention to the potential impact of inter-relationships among those independent variables—do they confound the regression parameters and hence their interpretation? Three empirical examples are deployed to address that question, with results which suggest considerable problems. Inter-relationships between variables, even if not approaching high collinearity, can have a substantial impact on regression model results and how they are interpreted in the light of prior expectations. Confounded relationships could be the norm and interpretations open to doubt, unless considerable care is applied in the analyses and an extended principal components method for doing that is introduced and exemplified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5993839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59938392018-06-21 Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour Johnston, Ron Jones, Kelvyn Manley, David Qual Quant Article Many ecological- and individual-level analyses of voting behaviour use multiple regressions with a considerable number of independent variables but few discussions of their results pay any attention to the potential impact of inter-relationships among those independent variables—do they confound the regression parameters and hence their interpretation? Three empirical examples are deployed to address that question, with results which suggest considerable problems. Inter-relationships between variables, even if not approaching high collinearity, can have a substantial impact on regression model results and how they are interpreted in the light of prior expectations. Confounded relationships could be the norm and interpretations open to doubt, unless considerable care is applied in the analyses and an extended principal components method for doing that is introduced and exemplified. Springer Netherlands 2017-11-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5993839/ /pubmed/29937587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Johnston, Ron Jones, Kelvyn Manley, David Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour |
title | Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour |
title_full | Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour |
title_fullStr | Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour |
title_full_unstemmed | Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour |
title_short | Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour |
title_sort | confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of british voting behaviour |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnstonron confoundingandcollinearityinregressionanalysisacautionarytaleandanalternativeprocedureillustratedbystudiesofbritishvotingbehaviour AT joneskelvyn confoundingandcollinearityinregressionanalysisacautionarytaleandanalternativeprocedureillustratedbystudiesofbritishvotingbehaviour AT manleydavid confoundingandcollinearityinregressionanalysisacautionarytaleandanalternativeprocedureillustratedbystudiesofbritishvotingbehaviour |