Cargando…

Hill–Sachs lesion measurement with tridimensional models in anterior shoulder instability()

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of Hill–Sachs lesion measurement from computed tomography images, with computer software and tridimensional prototype. METHODS: Three-dimensional models were made from computed tomography images from 14 patients with anterior shoulder inst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyazaki, Alberto Naoki, Silva, Luciana Andrade, Santos, Pedro Doneux, Sella, Guilherme do Val, Nagaya, Leonardo Hideto, Checchia, Sergio Luiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.008
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of Hill–Sachs lesion measurement from computed tomography images, with computer software and tridimensional prototype. METHODS: Three-dimensional models were made from computed tomography images from 14 patients with anterior shoulder instability, using InVesalius 3.0(®) software. Hill–Sachs lesions were measured with Rhinocerus 5.0(®) software with pre-determined position. Mid-lateral distance, perpendicular to humeral shaft, cranial-caudal distance, parallel to humeral shaft, and the longitudinal distance of the lesion were measured. Using the Printer-ZP 310 three-dimensional printer, plaster models were made. To measure the Hill–Sachs lesion, a calibrated universal digital caliper was used in the same way as the software. RESULTS: There was intra-observer and inter-observer variability for measurement of the same model. Observers did not perform the measurements in a similar way, showing difficulty to use the method (p < 0.05). Using the software to measure the mid-lateral distance, as well as in the measurement with the caliper, the model type influenced the measurements for each of the observers, rendering the method invalid (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no reproducibility and repeatability for Hill–Sachs lesion measurement between plaster models and software models.