Cargando…
Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine
BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) reduction is of benefit in chronic heart failure (HF). The effect of heart rate reduction using Ivabradine on various echocardiographic parameters in dilated cardiomyopathy has been less investigated. METHODS: Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II–IV, baseline HR > 70/...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.08.009 |
_version_ | 1783330320455565312 |
---|---|
author | Raja, Deep Chandh Kapoor, Aditya Sinha, Archana Kashyap, Shiridhar Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra Goel, Pravin |
author_facet | Raja, Deep Chandh Kapoor, Aditya Sinha, Archana Kashyap, Shiridhar Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra Goel, Pravin |
author_sort | Raja, Deep Chandh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) reduction is of benefit in chronic heart failure (HF). The effect of heart rate reduction using Ivabradine on various echocardiographic parameters in dilated cardiomyopathy has been less investigated. METHODS: Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II–IV, baseline HR > 70/min), 125 patients were randomized to standard therapy (beta blockers, ACEI, diuretics, n = 62) or add-on Ivabradine (titrated to maximum 7.5 mg BD, n = 63). Beta-blockers were titrated in both the groups. RESULTS: At 3 months both groups had improvement in NYHA class, 6 min walk test, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) scores and fall in BNP, however the magnitude of change was greater in Ivabradine group. Those on Ivabradine also had lower LV volumes, higher LVEF (28.8 ± 3.6 vs 27.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.01) and more favorable LV global strain (11 ± 1.7vs 12.2 ± 1.1, p = <0.001), MPI (0.72 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.1, p = <0.001), LV mass (115.2 ± 30 vs 131.4 ± 35, p = 0.007), LV wall stress (219.8 ± 46 vs 238 ± 54) and calculated LV work (366 ± 101 vs 401 ± 102, p = 0.05). The benefit of Ivabradine was sustained at 6 months follow up. The % change in HR was significantly higher in Ivabradine group (−32.2% vs −19.3%, p = 0.001) with no difference in blood pressure. Resting HR < 70/min was achieved in 96.8% vs 27.9%, respectively in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of Ivabradine to standard therapy in patients with DCM and symptomatic HF and targeting a heart rate < 70/min improves symptoms, quality of life and various echocardiographic parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5993928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59939282019-03-01 Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine Raja, Deep Chandh Kapoor, Aditya Sinha, Archana Kashyap, Shiridhar Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra Goel, Pravin Indian Heart J Clinical and Preventive Cardiology BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) reduction is of benefit in chronic heart failure (HF). The effect of heart rate reduction using Ivabradine on various echocardiographic parameters in dilated cardiomyopathy has been less investigated. METHODS: Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II–IV, baseline HR > 70/min), 125 patients were randomized to standard therapy (beta blockers, ACEI, diuretics, n = 62) or add-on Ivabradine (titrated to maximum 7.5 mg BD, n = 63). Beta-blockers were titrated in both the groups. RESULTS: At 3 months both groups had improvement in NYHA class, 6 min walk test, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) scores and fall in BNP, however the magnitude of change was greater in Ivabradine group. Those on Ivabradine also had lower LV volumes, higher LVEF (28.8 ± 3.6 vs 27.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.01) and more favorable LV global strain (11 ± 1.7vs 12.2 ± 1.1, p = <0.001), MPI (0.72 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.1, p = <0.001), LV mass (115.2 ± 30 vs 131.4 ± 35, p = 0.007), LV wall stress (219.8 ± 46 vs 238 ± 54) and calculated LV work (366 ± 101 vs 401 ± 102, p = 0.05). The benefit of Ivabradine was sustained at 6 months follow up. The % change in HR was significantly higher in Ivabradine group (−32.2% vs −19.3%, p = 0.001) with no difference in blood pressure. Resting HR < 70/min was achieved in 96.8% vs 27.9%, respectively in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of Ivabradine to standard therapy in patients with DCM and symptomatic HF and targeting a heart rate < 70/min improves symptoms, quality of life and various echocardiographic parameters. Elsevier 2018 2017-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5993928/ /pubmed/29716702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.08.009 Text en © 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cardiological Society of India. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Preventive Cardiology Raja, Deep Chandh Kapoor, Aditya Sinha, Archana Kashyap, Shiridhar Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra Goel, Pravin Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine |
title | Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine |
title_full | Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine |
title_fullStr | Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine |
title_full_unstemmed | Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine |
title_short | Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine |
title_sort | heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: assessing the role of ivabradine |
topic | Clinical and Preventive Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.08.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajadeepchandh heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine AT kapooraditya heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine AT sinhaarchana heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine AT kashyapshiridhar heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine AT khannaroopali heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine AT kumarsudeep heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine AT gargnaveen heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine AT tewarisatyendra heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine AT goelpravin heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine |