Cargando…

Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine

BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) reduction is of benefit in chronic heart failure (HF). The effect of heart rate reduction using Ivabradine on various echocardiographic parameters in dilated cardiomyopathy has been less investigated. METHODS: Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II–IV, baseline HR > 70/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raja, Deep Chandh, Kapoor, Aditya, Sinha, Archana, Kashyap, Shiridhar, Khanna, Roopali, Kumar, Sudeep, Garg, Naveen, Tewari, Satyendra, Goel, Pravin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.08.009
_version_ 1783330320455565312
author Raja, Deep Chandh
Kapoor, Aditya
Sinha, Archana
Kashyap, Shiridhar
Khanna, Roopali
Kumar, Sudeep
Garg, Naveen
Tewari, Satyendra
Goel, Pravin
author_facet Raja, Deep Chandh
Kapoor, Aditya
Sinha, Archana
Kashyap, Shiridhar
Khanna, Roopali
Kumar, Sudeep
Garg, Naveen
Tewari, Satyendra
Goel, Pravin
author_sort Raja, Deep Chandh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) reduction is of benefit in chronic heart failure (HF). The effect of heart rate reduction using Ivabradine on various echocardiographic parameters in dilated cardiomyopathy has been less investigated. METHODS: Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II–IV, baseline HR > 70/min), 125 patients were randomized to standard therapy (beta blockers, ACEI, diuretics, n = 62) or add-on Ivabradine (titrated to maximum 7.5 mg BD, n = 63). Beta-blockers were titrated in both the groups. RESULTS: At 3 months both groups had improvement in NYHA class, 6 min walk test, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) scores and fall in BNP, however the magnitude of change was greater in Ivabradine group. Those on Ivabradine also had lower LV volumes, higher LVEF (28.8 ± 3.6 vs 27.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.01) and more favorable LV global strain (11 ± 1.7vs 12.2 ± 1.1, p = <0.001), MPI (0.72 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.1, p = <0.001), LV mass (115.2 ± 30 vs 131.4 ± 35, p = 0.007), LV wall stress (219.8 ± 46 vs 238 ± 54) and calculated LV work (366 ± 101 vs 401 ± 102, p = 0.05). The benefit of Ivabradine was sustained at 6 months follow up. The % change in HR was significantly higher in Ivabradine group (−32.2% vs −19.3%, p = 0.001) with no difference in blood pressure. Resting HR < 70/min was achieved in 96.8% vs 27.9%, respectively in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of Ivabradine to standard therapy in patients with DCM and symptomatic HF and targeting a heart rate < 70/min improves symptoms, quality of life and various echocardiographic parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5993928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59939282019-03-01 Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine Raja, Deep Chandh Kapoor, Aditya Sinha, Archana Kashyap, Shiridhar Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra Goel, Pravin Indian Heart J Clinical and Preventive Cardiology BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) reduction is of benefit in chronic heart failure (HF). The effect of heart rate reduction using Ivabradine on various echocardiographic parameters in dilated cardiomyopathy has been less investigated. METHODS: Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II–IV, baseline HR > 70/min), 125 patients were randomized to standard therapy (beta blockers, ACEI, diuretics, n = 62) or add-on Ivabradine (titrated to maximum 7.5 mg BD, n = 63). Beta-blockers were titrated in both the groups. RESULTS: At 3 months both groups had improvement in NYHA class, 6 min walk test, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) scores and fall in BNP, however the magnitude of change was greater in Ivabradine group. Those on Ivabradine also had lower LV volumes, higher LVEF (28.8 ± 3.6 vs 27.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.01) and more favorable LV global strain (11 ± 1.7vs 12.2 ± 1.1, p = <0.001), MPI (0.72 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.1, p = <0.001), LV mass (115.2 ± 30 vs 131.4 ± 35, p = 0.007), LV wall stress (219.8 ± 46 vs 238 ± 54) and calculated LV work (366 ± 101 vs 401 ± 102, p = 0.05). The benefit of Ivabradine was sustained at 6 months follow up. The % change in HR was significantly higher in Ivabradine group (−32.2% vs −19.3%, p = 0.001) with no difference in blood pressure. Resting HR < 70/min was achieved in 96.8% vs 27.9%, respectively in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of Ivabradine to standard therapy in patients with DCM and symptomatic HF and targeting a heart rate < 70/min improves symptoms, quality of life and various echocardiographic parameters. Elsevier 2018 2017-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5993928/ /pubmed/29716702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.08.009 Text en © 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cardiological Society of India. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical and Preventive Cardiology
Raja, Deep Chandh
Kapoor, Aditya
Sinha, Archana
Kashyap, Shiridhar
Khanna, Roopali
Kumar, Sudeep
Garg, Naveen
Tewari, Satyendra
Goel, Pravin
Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine
title Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine
title_full Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine
title_fullStr Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine
title_full_unstemmed Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine
title_short Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine
title_sort heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: assessing the role of ivabradine
topic Clinical and Preventive Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.08.009
work_keys_str_mv AT rajadeepchandh heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine
AT kapooraditya heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine
AT sinhaarchana heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine
AT kashyapshiridhar heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine
AT khannaroopali heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine
AT kumarsudeep heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine
AT gargnaveen heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine
AT tewarisatyendra heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine
AT goelpravin heartratemanipulationindilatedcardiomyopathyassessingtheroleofivabradine