Cargando…

Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study

BACKGROUND: Researchers are increasingly interested in testing and developing computerized cognitive training interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder due to the limited accessibility of treatments for this disorder. Understanding the feasibility of testing cognitive interventions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benyakorn, Songpoom, Calub, Catrina A, Riley, Steven J, Schneider, Andrea, Iosif, Ana-Maria, Solomon, Marjorie, Hessl, David, Schweitzer, Julie B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802090
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9564
_version_ 1783330326199664640
author Benyakorn, Songpoom
Calub, Catrina A
Riley, Steven J
Schneider, Andrea
Iosif, Ana-Maria
Solomon, Marjorie
Hessl, David
Schweitzer, Julie B
author_facet Benyakorn, Songpoom
Calub, Catrina A
Riley, Steven J
Schneider, Andrea
Iosif, Ana-Maria
Solomon, Marjorie
Hessl, David
Schweitzer, Julie B
author_sort Benyakorn, Songpoom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Researchers are increasingly interested in testing and developing computerized cognitive training interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder due to the limited accessibility of treatments for this disorder. Understanding the feasibility of testing cognitive interventions for this population is critical, especially for individuals with ASD who have low to moderate intellectual ability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of computerized cognitive training as measured by attrition rate and a parent satisfaction survey. METHODS: A total of 26 participants aged 8-17 years with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and significant intellectual impairment were enrolled (mean age 11.1 years). They were instructed to complete 25 sessions of Cogmed Working Memory Training in 5 to 6 weeks with coach assistance. Attrition rate and parent satisfaction surveys were measured after the completion of training. RESULTS: Most participants (96%, 25/26) completed the training and indicated high satisfaction (>88%). However, among the participants who completed the training, 5 participants (19%) were unable to finish in 6 weeks, the recommended training period by Cogmed. Parents noted various positive (eg, voice-overs) and negative (eg, particular graphic and sounds associated with a stimulus) features of the game that they thought affected their child’s response. CONCLUSIONS: Children with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual impairments can successfully participate in computerized cognitive training interventions but may require additional weeks to complete the training beyond the time needed for children without intellectual impairments. The overall completion rate, with extended time to complete the training, was high. Developers of cognitive training programs for this population should take into account potential issues regarding the noise level of stimuli and characteristics of the visual graphics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5993974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59939742018-06-11 Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study Benyakorn, Songpoom Calub, Catrina A Riley, Steven J Schneider, Andrea Iosif, Ana-Maria Solomon, Marjorie Hessl, David Schweitzer, Julie B JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: Researchers are increasingly interested in testing and developing computerized cognitive training interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder due to the limited accessibility of treatments for this disorder. Understanding the feasibility of testing cognitive interventions for this population is critical, especially for individuals with ASD who have low to moderate intellectual ability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of computerized cognitive training as measured by attrition rate and a parent satisfaction survey. METHODS: A total of 26 participants aged 8-17 years with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and significant intellectual impairment were enrolled (mean age 11.1 years). They were instructed to complete 25 sessions of Cogmed Working Memory Training in 5 to 6 weeks with coach assistance. Attrition rate and parent satisfaction surveys were measured after the completion of training. RESULTS: Most participants (96%, 25/26) completed the training and indicated high satisfaction (>88%). However, among the participants who completed the training, 5 participants (19%) were unable to finish in 6 weeks, the recommended training period by Cogmed. Parents noted various positive (eg, voice-overs) and negative (eg, particular graphic and sounds associated with a stimulus) features of the game that they thought affected their child’s response. CONCLUSIONS: Children with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual impairments can successfully participate in computerized cognitive training interventions but may require additional weeks to complete the training beyond the time needed for children without intellectual impairments. The overall completion rate, with extended time to complete the training, was high. Developers of cognitive training programs for this population should take into account potential issues regarding the noise level of stimuli and characteristics of the visual graphics. JMIR Publications 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5993974/ /pubmed/29802090 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9564 Text en ©Songpoom Benyakorn, Catrina A Calub, Steven J Riley, Andrea Schneider, Ana-Maria Iosif, Marjorie Solomon, David Hessl, Julie B Schweitzer. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 25.05.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Benyakorn, Songpoom
Calub, Catrina A
Riley, Steven J
Schneider, Andrea
Iosif, Ana-Maria
Solomon, Marjorie
Hessl, David
Schweitzer, Julie B
Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study
title Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study
title_full Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study
title_fullStr Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study
title_full_unstemmed Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study
title_short Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study
title_sort computerized cognitive training in children with autism and intellectual disabilities: feasibility and satisfaction study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802090
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9564
work_keys_str_mv AT benyakornsongpoom computerizedcognitivetraininginchildrenwithautismandintellectualdisabilitiesfeasibilityandsatisfactionstudy
AT calubcatrinaa computerizedcognitivetraininginchildrenwithautismandintellectualdisabilitiesfeasibilityandsatisfactionstudy
AT rileystevenj computerizedcognitivetraininginchildrenwithautismandintellectualdisabilitiesfeasibilityandsatisfactionstudy
AT schneiderandrea computerizedcognitivetraininginchildrenwithautismandintellectualdisabilitiesfeasibilityandsatisfactionstudy
AT iosifanamaria computerizedcognitivetraininginchildrenwithautismandintellectualdisabilitiesfeasibilityandsatisfactionstudy
AT solomonmarjorie computerizedcognitivetraininginchildrenwithautismandintellectualdisabilitiesfeasibilityandsatisfactionstudy
AT hessldavid computerizedcognitivetraininginchildrenwithautismandintellectualdisabilitiesfeasibilityandsatisfactionstudy
AT schweitzerjulieb computerizedcognitivetraininginchildrenwithautismandintellectualdisabilitiesfeasibilityandsatisfactionstudy