Cargando…

Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and Germany

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic meta-analyses on caries detection methods should assist practitioners in their daily practice. However, conventional meta-analysis estimates may be inapplicable due to differences in test conduct, applied thresholds and assessed population between settings. Our aim was to demo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwendicke, Falk, Elhennawy, Karim, El Shahawy, Osama, Maher, Reham, Gimenez, Thais, Mendes, Fausto M., Willis, Brian H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29884157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0561-z
_version_ 1783330329297158144
author Schwendicke, Falk
Elhennawy, Karim
El Shahawy, Osama
Maher, Reham
Gimenez, Thais
Mendes, Fausto M.
Willis, Brian H.
author_facet Schwendicke, Falk
Elhennawy, Karim
El Shahawy, Osama
Maher, Reham
Gimenez, Thais
Mendes, Fausto M.
Willis, Brian H.
author_sort Schwendicke, Falk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic meta-analyses on caries detection methods should assist practitioners in their daily practice. However, conventional meta-analysis estimates may be inapplicable due to differences in test conduct, applied thresholds and assessed population between settings. Our aim was to demonstrate the impact of tailored meta-analysis of visual and radiographic caries detection to different settings using setting-specific routine data. METHODS: Published systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the accuracy of visual and radiographic caries detection were used. In two settings (a private practice in Germany and a public health clinic in Egypt), routine data of a total of 100 (n = 50/practice) consecutive 12–14 year-olds were collected. Test-positive rates of visual and radiographic detection for initial and advanced carious lesions on occlusal or proximal surfaces of molars were used to tailor meta-analyses. If prevalence data were available, these were also used for tailoring. RESULTS: From the original reviews, 210 and 100 heterogeneous studies on visual and radiographic caries detection were included in our meta-analyses. For radiographic detection, sensitivity and specificity estimates derived from conventional and tailored meta-analysis were similar. For visual detection of advanced occlusal carious lesions, the conventional meta-analysis yielded a sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of 64.6% (57–71) and 90.9% (88–93), whereas the tailored estimates for Egypt were 75.1% (70–81) and 84.9% (82–89), respectively, and 43.7% (37–51) and 96.5% (95–97) for Germany, respectively. CONCLUSION: Conventional test accuracy meta-analyses may yield aggregate estimates which are inapplicable to specific settings. Routine data may be used to produce a meta-analysis estimate which is tailored to the setting and thereby improving its applicability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-018-0561-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5993995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59939952018-07-05 Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and Germany Schwendicke, Falk Elhennawy, Karim El Shahawy, Osama Maher, Reham Gimenez, Thais Mendes, Fausto M. Willis, Brian H. BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnostic meta-analyses on caries detection methods should assist practitioners in their daily practice. However, conventional meta-analysis estimates may be inapplicable due to differences in test conduct, applied thresholds and assessed population between settings. Our aim was to demonstrate the impact of tailored meta-analysis of visual and radiographic caries detection to different settings using setting-specific routine data. METHODS: Published systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the accuracy of visual and radiographic caries detection were used. In two settings (a private practice in Germany and a public health clinic in Egypt), routine data of a total of 100 (n = 50/practice) consecutive 12–14 year-olds were collected. Test-positive rates of visual and radiographic detection for initial and advanced carious lesions on occlusal or proximal surfaces of molars were used to tailor meta-analyses. If prevalence data were available, these were also used for tailoring. RESULTS: From the original reviews, 210 and 100 heterogeneous studies on visual and radiographic caries detection were included in our meta-analyses. For radiographic detection, sensitivity and specificity estimates derived from conventional and tailored meta-analysis were similar. For visual detection of advanced occlusal carious lesions, the conventional meta-analysis yielded a sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of 64.6% (57–71) and 90.9% (88–93), whereas the tailored estimates for Egypt were 75.1% (70–81) and 84.9% (82–89), respectively, and 43.7% (37–51) and 96.5% (95–97) for Germany, respectively. CONCLUSION: Conventional test accuracy meta-analyses may yield aggregate estimates which are inapplicable to specific settings. Routine data may be used to produce a meta-analysis estimate which is tailored to the setting and thereby improving its applicability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-018-0561-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5993995/ /pubmed/29884157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0561-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schwendicke, Falk
Elhennawy, Karim
El Shahawy, Osama
Maher, Reham
Gimenez, Thais
Mendes, Fausto M.
Willis, Brian H.
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and Germany
title Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and Germany
title_full Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and Germany
title_fullStr Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and Germany
title_full_unstemmed Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and Germany
title_short Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and Germany
title_sort visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, egypt and germany
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29884157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0561-z
work_keys_str_mv AT schwendickefalk visualandradiographiccariesdetectionatailoredmetaanalysisfortwodifferentsettingsegyptandgermany
AT elhennawykarim visualandradiographiccariesdetectionatailoredmetaanalysisfortwodifferentsettingsegyptandgermany
AT elshahawyosama visualandradiographiccariesdetectionatailoredmetaanalysisfortwodifferentsettingsegyptandgermany
AT maherreham visualandradiographiccariesdetectionatailoredmetaanalysisfortwodifferentsettingsegyptandgermany
AT gimenezthais visualandradiographiccariesdetectionatailoredmetaanalysisfortwodifferentsettingsegyptandgermany
AT mendesfaustom visualandradiographiccariesdetectionatailoredmetaanalysisfortwodifferentsettingsegyptandgermany
AT willisbrianh visualandradiographiccariesdetectionatailoredmetaanalysisfortwodifferentsettingsegyptandgermany