Cargando…

The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of three different risk displays used in a cardiovascular risk calculator on patients’ motivation for shared decision-making (SDM). We compared a newly developed time-to-event (TTE) display with two established absolute risk displays (i.e. emoticons an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jegan, Nikita Roman A., Kürwitz, Sarah Anna, Kramer, Lena Kathrin, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika, Adarkwah, Charles Christian, Popert, Uwe, Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29885661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x
_version_ 1783330403690479616
author Jegan, Nikita Roman A.
Kürwitz, Sarah Anna
Kramer, Lena Kathrin
Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika
Adarkwah, Charles Christian
Popert, Uwe
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
author_facet Jegan, Nikita Roman A.
Kürwitz, Sarah Anna
Kramer, Lena Kathrin
Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika
Adarkwah, Charles Christian
Popert, Uwe
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
author_sort Jegan, Nikita Roman A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of three different risk displays used in a cardiovascular risk calculator on patients’ motivation for shared decision-making (SDM). We compared a newly developed time-to-event (TTE) display with two established absolute risk displays (i.e. emoticons and bar charts). The accessibility, that is, how understandable, helpful, and trustworthy patients found each display, was also investigated. METHODS: We analysed a sample of 353 patients recruited in general practices. After giving consent, patients were introduced to one of three fictional vignettes with low, medium or high cardiovascular risk. All three risk displays were shown in a randomized order. Patients were asked to rate each display with regard to motivation for SDM and accessibility. Two-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted to compare the displays and investigate possible interactions with age. RESULTS: Regarding motivation for SDM, the TTE elicited the highest motivation, followed by the emoticons and bar chart (p < .001). The displays had no differential influence on the age groups (p = .445). While the TTE was generally rated more accessible than the emoticons and bar chart (p < .001), the emoticons were only superior to the bar chart in the younger subsample. However, this was only to a small effect (interaction between display and age, p < .01, η(2) = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Using fictional case vignettes, the novel TTE display was superior regarding motivation for SDM and accessibility when compared to established displays using emoticons and a bar chart. If future research can replicate these results in real-life consultations, the TTE display will be a valuable addition to current risk calculators and decision aids by improving patients’ participation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5994251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59942512018-06-21 The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making Jegan, Nikita Roman A. Kürwitz, Sarah Anna Kramer, Lena Kathrin Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Adarkwah, Charles Christian Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of three different risk displays used in a cardiovascular risk calculator on patients’ motivation for shared decision-making (SDM). We compared a newly developed time-to-event (TTE) display with two established absolute risk displays (i.e. emoticons and bar charts). The accessibility, that is, how understandable, helpful, and trustworthy patients found each display, was also investigated. METHODS: We analysed a sample of 353 patients recruited in general practices. After giving consent, patients were introduced to one of three fictional vignettes with low, medium or high cardiovascular risk. All three risk displays were shown in a randomized order. Patients were asked to rate each display with regard to motivation for SDM and accessibility. Two-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted to compare the displays and investigate possible interactions with age. RESULTS: Regarding motivation for SDM, the TTE elicited the highest motivation, followed by the emoticons and bar chart (p < .001). The displays had no differential influence on the age groups (p = .445). While the TTE was generally rated more accessible than the emoticons and bar chart (p < .001), the emoticons were only superior to the bar chart in the younger subsample. However, this was only to a small effect (interaction between display and age, p < .01, η(2) = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Using fictional case vignettes, the novel TTE display was superior regarding motivation for SDM and accessibility when compared to established displays using emoticons and a bar chart. If future research can replicate these results in real-life consultations, the TTE display will be a valuable addition to current risk calculators and decision aids by improving patients’ participation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5994251/ /pubmed/29885661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jegan, Nikita Roman A.
Kürwitz, Sarah Anna
Kramer, Lena Kathrin
Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika
Adarkwah, Charles Christian
Popert, Uwe
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making
title The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making
title_full The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making
title_fullStr The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making
title_full_unstemmed The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making
title_short The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making
title_sort effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29885661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jegannikitaromana theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT kurwitzsarahanna theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT kramerlenakathrin theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT heinzelgutenbrunnermonika theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT adarkwahcharleschristian theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT popertuwe theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT donnerbanzhoffnorbert theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT jegannikitaromana effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT kurwitzsarahanna effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT kramerlenakathrin effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT heinzelgutenbrunnermonika effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT adarkwahcharleschristian effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT popertuwe effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking
AT donnerbanzhoffnorbert effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking