Cargando…
The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of three different risk displays used in a cardiovascular risk calculator on patients’ motivation for shared decision-making (SDM). We compared a newly developed time-to-event (TTE) display with two established absolute risk displays (i.e. emoticons an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29885661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x |
_version_ | 1783330403690479616 |
---|---|
author | Jegan, Nikita Roman A. Kürwitz, Sarah Anna Kramer, Lena Kathrin Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Adarkwah, Charles Christian Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert |
author_facet | Jegan, Nikita Roman A. Kürwitz, Sarah Anna Kramer, Lena Kathrin Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Adarkwah, Charles Christian Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert |
author_sort | Jegan, Nikita Roman A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of three different risk displays used in a cardiovascular risk calculator on patients’ motivation for shared decision-making (SDM). We compared a newly developed time-to-event (TTE) display with two established absolute risk displays (i.e. emoticons and bar charts). The accessibility, that is, how understandable, helpful, and trustworthy patients found each display, was also investigated. METHODS: We analysed a sample of 353 patients recruited in general practices. After giving consent, patients were introduced to one of three fictional vignettes with low, medium or high cardiovascular risk. All three risk displays were shown in a randomized order. Patients were asked to rate each display with regard to motivation for SDM and accessibility. Two-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted to compare the displays and investigate possible interactions with age. RESULTS: Regarding motivation for SDM, the TTE elicited the highest motivation, followed by the emoticons and bar chart (p < .001). The displays had no differential influence on the age groups (p = .445). While the TTE was generally rated more accessible than the emoticons and bar chart (p < .001), the emoticons were only superior to the bar chart in the younger subsample. However, this was only to a small effect (interaction between display and age, p < .01, η(2) = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Using fictional case vignettes, the novel TTE display was superior regarding motivation for SDM and accessibility when compared to established displays using emoticons and a bar chart. If future research can replicate these results in real-life consultations, the TTE display will be a valuable addition to current risk calculators and decision aids by improving patients’ participation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5994251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59942512018-06-21 The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making Jegan, Nikita Roman A. Kürwitz, Sarah Anna Kramer, Lena Kathrin Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Adarkwah, Charles Christian Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of three different risk displays used in a cardiovascular risk calculator on patients’ motivation for shared decision-making (SDM). We compared a newly developed time-to-event (TTE) display with two established absolute risk displays (i.e. emoticons and bar charts). The accessibility, that is, how understandable, helpful, and trustworthy patients found each display, was also investigated. METHODS: We analysed a sample of 353 patients recruited in general practices. After giving consent, patients were introduced to one of three fictional vignettes with low, medium or high cardiovascular risk. All three risk displays were shown in a randomized order. Patients were asked to rate each display with regard to motivation for SDM and accessibility. Two-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted to compare the displays and investigate possible interactions with age. RESULTS: Regarding motivation for SDM, the TTE elicited the highest motivation, followed by the emoticons and bar chart (p < .001). The displays had no differential influence on the age groups (p = .445). While the TTE was generally rated more accessible than the emoticons and bar chart (p < .001), the emoticons were only superior to the bar chart in the younger subsample. However, this was only to a small effect (interaction between display and age, p < .01, η(2) = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Using fictional case vignettes, the novel TTE display was superior regarding motivation for SDM and accessibility when compared to established displays using emoticons and a bar chart. If future research can replicate these results in real-life consultations, the TTE display will be a valuable addition to current risk calculators and decision aids by improving patients’ participation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5994251/ /pubmed/29885661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jegan, Nikita Roman A. Kürwitz, Sarah Anna Kramer, Lena Kathrin Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Adarkwah, Charles Christian Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making |
title | The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making |
title_full | The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making |
title_fullStr | The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making |
title_short | The effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making |
title_sort | effect of a new lifetime-cardiovascular-risk display on patients’ motivation to participate in shared decision-making |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29885661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0766-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jegannikitaromana theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT kurwitzsarahanna theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT kramerlenakathrin theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT heinzelgutenbrunnermonika theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT adarkwahcharleschristian theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT popertuwe theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT donnerbanzhoffnorbert theeffectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT jegannikitaromana effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT kurwitzsarahanna effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT kramerlenakathrin effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT heinzelgutenbrunnermonika effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT adarkwahcharleschristian effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT popertuwe effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking AT donnerbanzhoffnorbert effectofanewlifetimecardiovascularriskdisplayonpatientsmotivationtoparticipateinshareddecisionmaking |