Cargando…

Transient Elastography for Significant Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The hepatitis B virus infection is a global health issue and the stage of liver fibrosis affects the prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We performed the meta-analysis describing diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography (TE) for predicting CHB-related fibrosis. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Xiaolong, An, Min, Wu, Tongwei, Jiang, Deke, Peng, Mengyun, Wang, Weidong, Wang, Jing, Zhang, Chunqing, CHESS Study Group, on behalf of the
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3406789
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The hepatitis B virus infection is a global health issue and the stage of liver fibrosis affects the prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We performed the meta-analysis describing diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography (TE) for predicting CHB-related fibrosis. METHODS: We performed an adequate literature search to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of TE in CHB patients using biopsy as reference standard. Hierarchical summary receiver-operating curves model and the bivariate mixed-effects binary regression model were applied to generate summary receiver-operating characteristic curves and pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The area under the summary receiver-operating curve for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–0.89) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.94), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of TE for significant fibrosis were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73–0.81, p < 0.01; I(2) = 85.59%), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.84, p < 0.01; I(2) = 88.20%), and 14.44 (95% CI: 10.80–19.31, p < 0.01; I(2) = 100%) and for cirrhosis were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80–0.88, p < 0.01; I(2) = 76.67%), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84–0.90, p < 0.01; I(2) = 90.89%), and 36.63 (95% CI: 25.38–52.87, p < 0.01; I(2) = 100%), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of TE were 7.25 kPa for diagnosing significant fibrosis and 12.4 kPa for diagnosing cirrhosis, respectively. CONCLUSION: TE is of great value in the detection of patients with CHB-related cirrhosis but has a suboptimal accuracy in the detection of significant fibrosis.