Cargando…
Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect
Tenderness and intramuscular fat content are key attributes for beef sensory qualities. Recently some proteomic analysis revealed several proteins which are considered as good biomarkers of these quality traits. This study focuses on the analysis of 20 of these proteins representative of several bio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892502 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4891 |
_version_ | 1783330427097841664 |
---|---|
author | Picard, Brigitte Gagaoua, Mohammed Al-Jammas, Marwa De Koning, Leanne Valais, Albéric Bonnet, Muriel |
author_facet | Picard, Brigitte Gagaoua, Mohammed Al-Jammas, Marwa De Koning, Leanne Valais, Albéric Bonnet, Muriel |
author_sort | Picard, Brigitte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tenderness and intramuscular fat content are key attributes for beef sensory qualities. Recently some proteomic analysis revealed several proteins which are considered as good biomarkers of these quality traits. This study focuses on the analysis of 20 of these proteins representative of several biological functions: muscle structure and ultrastructure, muscle energetic metabolism, cellular stress and apoptosis. The relative abundance of the proteins was measured by Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) in five muscles known to have different tenderness and intramuscular lipid contents: Longissimus thoracis (LT), Semimembranosus (SM), Rectus abdominis (RA), Triceps brachii (TB) and Semitendinosus (ST). The main results showed a muscle type effect on 16 among the 20 analyzed proteins. They revealed differences in protein abundance depending on the contractile and metabolic properties of the muscles. The RA muscle was the most different by 11 proteins differentially abundant comparatively to the four other muscles. Among these 11 proteins, six were less abundant namely enolase 3 (ENO3), phosphoglucomutase 1 (PGK1), aldolase (ALDOA), myosin heavy chain IIX (MyHC-IIX), fast myosin light chain 1 (MLC1F), triosephosphate isomerase 1 (TPI1) and five more abundant: Heat shock protein (HSP27, HSP70-1A1, αB-crystallin (CRYAB), troponin T slow (TNNT1), and aldolase dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1A1). Four proteins: HSP40, four and a half LIM domains protein 1 (FHL1), glycogen phosphorylase B (PYGB) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH1) showed the same abundance whatever the muscle. The correlations observed between the 20 proteins in all the five muscles were used to construct a correlation network. The proteins the most connected with the others were in the following order MyHC-IIX, CRYAB, TPI1, PGK1, ALDH1A1, HSP27 and TNNT1. This knowledge is important for understanding the biological functions related to beef tenderness and intramuscular fat content. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5994332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59943322018-06-11 Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect Picard, Brigitte Gagaoua, Mohammed Al-Jammas, Marwa De Koning, Leanne Valais, Albéric Bonnet, Muriel PeerJ Agricultural Science Tenderness and intramuscular fat content are key attributes for beef sensory qualities. Recently some proteomic analysis revealed several proteins which are considered as good biomarkers of these quality traits. This study focuses on the analysis of 20 of these proteins representative of several biological functions: muscle structure and ultrastructure, muscle energetic metabolism, cellular stress and apoptosis. The relative abundance of the proteins was measured by Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) in five muscles known to have different tenderness and intramuscular lipid contents: Longissimus thoracis (LT), Semimembranosus (SM), Rectus abdominis (RA), Triceps brachii (TB) and Semitendinosus (ST). The main results showed a muscle type effect on 16 among the 20 analyzed proteins. They revealed differences in protein abundance depending on the contractile and metabolic properties of the muscles. The RA muscle was the most different by 11 proteins differentially abundant comparatively to the four other muscles. Among these 11 proteins, six were less abundant namely enolase 3 (ENO3), phosphoglucomutase 1 (PGK1), aldolase (ALDOA), myosin heavy chain IIX (MyHC-IIX), fast myosin light chain 1 (MLC1F), triosephosphate isomerase 1 (TPI1) and five more abundant: Heat shock protein (HSP27, HSP70-1A1, αB-crystallin (CRYAB), troponin T slow (TNNT1), and aldolase dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1A1). Four proteins: HSP40, four and a half LIM domains protein 1 (FHL1), glycogen phosphorylase B (PYGB) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH1) showed the same abundance whatever the muscle. The correlations observed between the 20 proteins in all the five muscles were used to construct a correlation network. The proteins the most connected with the others were in the following order MyHC-IIX, CRYAB, TPI1, PGK1, ALDH1A1, HSP27 and TNNT1. This knowledge is important for understanding the biological functions related to beef tenderness and intramuscular fat content. PeerJ Inc. 2018-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5994332/ /pubmed/29892502 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4891 Text en ©2018 Picard et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Agricultural Science Picard, Brigitte Gagaoua, Mohammed Al-Jammas, Marwa De Koning, Leanne Valais, Albéric Bonnet, Muriel Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect |
title | Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect |
title_full | Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect |
title_fullStr | Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect |
title_short | Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect |
title_sort | beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect |
topic | Agricultural Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892502 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4891 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT picardbrigitte beeftendernessandintramuscularfatproteomicbiomarkersmuscletypeeffect AT gagaouamohammed beeftendernessandintramuscularfatproteomicbiomarkersmuscletypeeffect AT aljammasmarwa beeftendernessandintramuscularfatproteomicbiomarkersmuscletypeeffect AT dekoningleanne beeftendernessandintramuscularfatproteomicbiomarkersmuscletypeeffect AT valaisalberic beeftendernessandintramuscularfatproteomicbiomarkersmuscletypeeffect AT bonnetmuriel beeftendernessandintramuscularfatproteomicbiomarkersmuscletypeeffect |