Cargando…

Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale

BACKGROUND: Early recognition of Stroke is one of the key concepts in the “Chain of Survival” as described by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke guidelines. The most commonly used tools for prehospital assessment of stroke are “The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale,”...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maddali, Aditya, Razack, Farook Abdul, Cattamanchi, Srihari, Ramakrishnan, Trichur V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937640
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_8_17
_version_ 1783330518737092608
author Maddali, Aditya
Razack, Farook Abdul
Cattamanchi, Srihari
Ramakrishnan, Trichur V.
author_facet Maddali, Aditya
Razack, Farook Abdul
Cattamanchi, Srihari
Ramakrishnan, Trichur V.
author_sort Maddali, Aditya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early recognition of Stroke is one of the key concepts in the “Chain of Survival” as described by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke guidelines. The most commonly used tools for prehospital assessment of stroke are “The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale,” (CPSS) the “Face, Arm, Speech Test,” and “The Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen.” The former two are used to identify stroke using physical findings while the latter is used to rule out other causes of altered consciousness. AIM: The aim of this study is to validate the CPSS in the prehospital setting by correlating with computed tomography scan findings. (1) To determine if these scores can be implemented in the Indian prehospital setting. (2) To determine if it is feasible for new emergency departments (EDs) to use these protocols for early detection of stroke. METHODOLOGY: A prospective, observational study from December, 2015 to March, 2016. Patients with suspected stroke were enrolled. Data were collected prehospital in patients that arrived to the ED in an ambulance. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the score were calculated using standard formulae. RESULTS: CPSS showed good sensitivity of 81% (confidence interval [CI] – 68.5%–97%) when combined and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% (CI: 91.9%–100%). Individually, they showed a sensitivity of 75.8%, 79%, and 74.1%, respectively, with a PPV of 100% and specificity of 95%–100%. CONCLUSION: As a prehospital screening tool, CPSS can be extremely useful as any diagnosis is only provisional until confirmed by an appropriate investigation in a hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5994852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59948522018-06-22 Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale Maddali, Aditya Razack, Farook Abdul Cattamanchi, Srihari Ramakrishnan, Trichur V. J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article BACKGROUND: Early recognition of Stroke is one of the key concepts in the “Chain of Survival” as described by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke guidelines. The most commonly used tools for prehospital assessment of stroke are “The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale,” (CPSS) the “Face, Arm, Speech Test,” and “The Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen.” The former two are used to identify stroke using physical findings while the latter is used to rule out other causes of altered consciousness. AIM: The aim of this study is to validate the CPSS in the prehospital setting by correlating with computed tomography scan findings. (1) To determine if these scores can be implemented in the Indian prehospital setting. (2) To determine if it is feasible for new emergency departments (EDs) to use these protocols for early detection of stroke. METHODOLOGY: A prospective, observational study from December, 2015 to March, 2016. Patients with suspected stroke were enrolled. Data were collected prehospital in patients that arrived to the ED in an ambulance. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the score were calculated using standard formulae. RESULTS: CPSS showed good sensitivity of 81% (confidence interval [CI] – 68.5%–97%) when combined and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% (CI: 91.9%–100%). Individually, they showed a sensitivity of 75.8%, 79%, and 74.1%, respectively, with a PPV of 100% and specificity of 95%–100%. CONCLUSION: As a prehospital screening tool, CPSS can be extremely useful as any diagnosis is only provisional until confirmed by an appropriate investigation in a hospital. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5994852/ /pubmed/29937640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_8_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maddali, Aditya
Razack, Farook Abdul
Cattamanchi, Srihari
Ramakrishnan, Trichur V.
Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale
title Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale
title_full Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale
title_fullStr Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale
title_short Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale
title_sort validation of the cincinnati prehospital stroke scale
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5994852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937640
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_8_17
work_keys_str_mv AT maddaliaditya validationofthecincinnatiprehospitalstrokescale
AT razackfarookabdul validationofthecincinnatiprehospitalstrokescale
AT cattamanchisrihari validationofthecincinnatiprehospitalstrokescale
AT ramakrishnantrichurv validationofthecincinnatiprehospitalstrokescale