Cargando…
Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes
OBJECTIVES: Several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are administered as weekly injections for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). These medications vary in their injection processes, and a recent study in the UK found that these differences had an impact on patient preference and health st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5995299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922043 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S159620 |
_version_ | 1783330593206960128 |
---|---|
author | Matza, Louis S Boye, Kristina S Jordan, Jessica B Norrbacka, Kirsi Gentilella, Raffaella Tiebout, Amara R Browne, Chantelle Orsini Federici, Marco Biricolti, Giovanni Stewart, Katie D |
author_facet | Matza, Louis S Boye, Kristina S Jordan, Jessica B Norrbacka, Kirsi Gentilella, Raffaella Tiebout, Amara R Browne, Chantelle Orsini Federici, Marco Biricolti, Giovanni Stewart, Katie D |
author_sort | Matza, Louis S |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are administered as weekly injections for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). These medications vary in their injection processes, and a recent study in the UK found that these differences had an impact on patient preference and health state utilities. The purpose of this study was to replicate the UK study in Italy to examine preferences of an Italian patient sample, while allowing for comparison between utilities in the UK and Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with T2D in Italy valued health states in time trade-off interviews. All health states had the same description of T2D, but differed in description of the treatment process. As in the original UK study, the first health state described an oral treatment regimen, while additional health states added a weekly injection. The injection health states differed in three injection-related attributes: requirements for reconstituting the medication, waiting during medication preparation, and needle handling. RESULTS: Interviews were completed by 238 patients (58.8% male; mean age = 60.2 years; 118 from Milan, 120 from Rome). The oral treatment health state had a mean (SD) utility of 0.90 (0.10). The injection health states had significantly (p < 0.0001) lower utilities, which ranged from 0.87 (requirements for reconstitution, waiting, and handling) to 0.89 (weekly injection with none of these requirements). Differences in health state utility scores suggest that each administration requirement was associated with a disutility (ie, negative utility difference): −0.006 (reconstitution), −0.006 (needle handling), −0.011 (reconstitution, needle handling), and −0.022 (reconstitution, waiting, needle handling). CONCLUSION: Disutilities associated with the injection device characteristics were similar to those reported with the UK sample. Results suggest that injection device attributes may be important to some patients with T2D, and it may be useful for clinicians to consider these attributes when choosing medication for patients initiating these weekly treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5995299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59952992018-06-19 Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes Matza, Louis S Boye, Kristina S Jordan, Jessica B Norrbacka, Kirsi Gentilella, Raffaella Tiebout, Amara R Browne, Chantelle Orsini Federici, Marco Biricolti, Giovanni Stewart, Katie D Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research OBJECTIVES: Several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are administered as weekly injections for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). These medications vary in their injection processes, and a recent study in the UK found that these differences had an impact on patient preference and health state utilities. The purpose of this study was to replicate the UK study in Italy to examine preferences of an Italian patient sample, while allowing for comparison between utilities in the UK and Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with T2D in Italy valued health states in time trade-off interviews. All health states had the same description of T2D, but differed in description of the treatment process. As in the original UK study, the first health state described an oral treatment regimen, while additional health states added a weekly injection. The injection health states differed in three injection-related attributes: requirements for reconstituting the medication, waiting during medication preparation, and needle handling. RESULTS: Interviews were completed by 238 patients (58.8% male; mean age = 60.2 years; 118 from Milan, 120 from Rome). The oral treatment health state had a mean (SD) utility of 0.90 (0.10). The injection health states had significantly (p < 0.0001) lower utilities, which ranged from 0.87 (requirements for reconstitution, waiting, and handling) to 0.89 (weekly injection with none of these requirements). Differences in health state utility scores suggest that each administration requirement was associated with a disutility (ie, negative utility difference): −0.006 (reconstitution), −0.006 (needle handling), −0.011 (reconstitution, needle handling), and −0.022 (reconstitution, waiting, needle handling). CONCLUSION: Disutilities associated with the injection device characteristics were similar to those reported with the UK sample. Results suggest that injection device attributes may be important to some patients with T2D, and it may be useful for clinicians to consider these attributes when choosing medication for patients initiating these weekly treatments. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5995299/ /pubmed/29922043 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S159620 Text en © 2018 Matza et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Matza, Louis S Boye, Kristina S Jordan, Jessica B Norrbacka, Kirsi Gentilella, Raffaella Tiebout, Amara R Browne, Chantelle Orsini Federici, Marco Biricolti, Giovanni Stewart, Katie D Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes |
title | Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes |
title_full | Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes |
title_fullStr | Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes |
title_short | Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes |
title_sort | patient preferences in italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5995299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922043 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S159620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matzalouiss patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT boyekristinas patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT jordanjessicab patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT norrbackakirsi patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT gentilellaraffaella patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT tieboutamarar patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT brownechantelle patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT orsinifedericimarco patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT biricoltigiovanni patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes AT stewartkatied patientpreferencesinitalyhealthstateutilitiesassociatedwithattributesofweeklyinjectiondevicesfortreatmentoftype2diabetes |