Cargando…

Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can greatly enhance our understanding of global biodiversity and our ability to detect rare or cryptic species. However, sampling effort must be considered when interpreting results from these surveys. We explored how sampling effort influenced biodiversity pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grey, Erin K., Bernatchez, Louis, Cassey, Phillip, Deiner, Kristy, Deveney, Marty, Howland, Kimberly L., Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs, Leong, Sandric Chee Yew, Li, Yiyuan, Olds, Brett, Pfrender, Michael E., Prowse, Thomas A. A., Renshaw, Mark A., Lodge, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5995838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29891968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27048-2
_version_ 1783330683362476032
author Grey, Erin K.
Bernatchez, Louis
Cassey, Phillip
Deiner, Kristy
Deveney, Marty
Howland, Kimberly L.
Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs
Leong, Sandric Chee Yew
Li, Yiyuan
Olds, Brett
Pfrender, Michael E.
Prowse, Thomas A. A.
Renshaw, Mark A.
Lodge, David M.
author_facet Grey, Erin K.
Bernatchez, Louis
Cassey, Phillip
Deiner, Kristy
Deveney, Marty
Howland, Kimberly L.
Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs
Leong, Sandric Chee Yew
Li, Yiyuan
Olds, Brett
Pfrender, Michael E.
Prowse, Thomas A. A.
Renshaw, Mark A.
Lodge, David M.
author_sort Grey, Erin K.
collection PubMed
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can greatly enhance our understanding of global biodiversity and our ability to detect rare or cryptic species. However, sampling effort must be considered when interpreting results from these surveys. We explored how sampling effort influenced biodiversity patterns and nonindigenous species (NIS) detection in an eDNA metabarcoding survey of four commercial ports. Overall, we captured sequences from 18 metazoan phyla with minimal differences in taxonomic coverage between 18 S and COI primer sets. While community dissimilarity patterns were consistent across primers and sampling effort, richness patterns were not, suggesting that richness estimates are extremely sensitive to primer choice and sampling effort. The survey detected 64 potential NIS, with COI identifying more known NIS from port checklists but 18 S identifying more operational taxonomic units shared between three or more ports that represent un-recorded potential NIS. Overall, we conclude that eDNA metabarcoding surveys can reveal global similarity patterns among ports across a broad array of taxa and can also detect potential NIS in these key habitats. However, richness estimates and species assignments require caution. Based on results of this study, we make several recommendations for port eDNA sampling design and suggest several areas for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5995838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59958382018-06-21 Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys Grey, Erin K. Bernatchez, Louis Cassey, Phillip Deiner, Kristy Deveney, Marty Howland, Kimberly L. Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs Leong, Sandric Chee Yew Li, Yiyuan Olds, Brett Pfrender, Michael E. Prowse, Thomas A. A. Renshaw, Mark A. Lodge, David M. Sci Rep Article Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can greatly enhance our understanding of global biodiversity and our ability to detect rare or cryptic species. However, sampling effort must be considered when interpreting results from these surveys. We explored how sampling effort influenced biodiversity patterns and nonindigenous species (NIS) detection in an eDNA metabarcoding survey of four commercial ports. Overall, we captured sequences from 18 metazoan phyla with minimal differences in taxonomic coverage between 18 S and COI primer sets. While community dissimilarity patterns were consistent across primers and sampling effort, richness patterns were not, suggesting that richness estimates are extremely sensitive to primer choice and sampling effort. The survey detected 64 potential NIS, with COI identifying more known NIS from port checklists but 18 S identifying more operational taxonomic units shared between three or more ports that represent un-recorded potential NIS. Overall, we conclude that eDNA metabarcoding surveys can reveal global similarity patterns among ports across a broad array of taxa and can also detect potential NIS in these key habitats. However, richness estimates and species assignments require caution. Based on results of this study, we make several recommendations for port eDNA sampling design and suggest several areas for future research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5995838/ /pubmed/29891968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27048-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Grey, Erin K.
Bernatchez, Louis
Cassey, Phillip
Deiner, Kristy
Deveney, Marty
Howland, Kimberly L.
Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs
Leong, Sandric Chee Yew
Li, Yiyuan
Olds, Brett
Pfrender, Michael E.
Prowse, Thomas A. A.
Renshaw, Mark A.
Lodge, David M.
Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys
title Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys
title_full Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys
title_fullStr Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys
title_full_unstemmed Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys
title_short Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys
title_sort effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental dna metabarcoding surveys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5995838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29891968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27048-2
work_keys_str_mv AT greyerink effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT bernatchezlouis effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT casseyphillip effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT deinerkristy effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT deveneymarty effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT howlandkimberlyl effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT lacoursiererousselanais effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT leongsandriccheeyew effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT liyiyuan effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT oldsbrett effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT pfrendermichaele effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT prowsethomasaa effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT renshawmarka effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys
AT lodgedavidm effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys