Cargando…
Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can greatly enhance our understanding of global biodiversity and our ability to detect rare or cryptic species. However, sampling effort must be considered when interpreting results from these surveys. We explored how sampling effort influenced biodiversity pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5995838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29891968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27048-2 |
_version_ | 1783330683362476032 |
---|---|
author | Grey, Erin K. Bernatchez, Louis Cassey, Phillip Deiner, Kristy Deveney, Marty Howland, Kimberly L. Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs Leong, Sandric Chee Yew Li, Yiyuan Olds, Brett Pfrender, Michael E. Prowse, Thomas A. A. Renshaw, Mark A. Lodge, David M. |
author_facet | Grey, Erin K. Bernatchez, Louis Cassey, Phillip Deiner, Kristy Deveney, Marty Howland, Kimberly L. Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs Leong, Sandric Chee Yew Li, Yiyuan Olds, Brett Pfrender, Michael E. Prowse, Thomas A. A. Renshaw, Mark A. Lodge, David M. |
author_sort | Grey, Erin K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can greatly enhance our understanding of global biodiversity and our ability to detect rare or cryptic species. However, sampling effort must be considered when interpreting results from these surveys. We explored how sampling effort influenced biodiversity patterns and nonindigenous species (NIS) detection in an eDNA metabarcoding survey of four commercial ports. Overall, we captured sequences from 18 metazoan phyla with minimal differences in taxonomic coverage between 18 S and COI primer sets. While community dissimilarity patterns were consistent across primers and sampling effort, richness patterns were not, suggesting that richness estimates are extremely sensitive to primer choice and sampling effort. The survey detected 64 potential NIS, with COI identifying more known NIS from port checklists but 18 S identifying more operational taxonomic units shared between three or more ports that represent un-recorded potential NIS. Overall, we conclude that eDNA metabarcoding surveys can reveal global similarity patterns among ports across a broad array of taxa and can also detect potential NIS in these key habitats. However, richness estimates and species assignments require caution. Based on results of this study, we make several recommendations for port eDNA sampling design and suggest several areas for future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5995838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59958382018-06-21 Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys Grey, Erin K. Bernatchez, Louis Cassey, Phillip Deiner, Kristy Deveney, Marty Howland, Kimberly L. Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs Leong, Sandric Chee Yew Li, Yiyuan Olds, Brett Pfrender, Michael E. Prowse, Thomas A. A. Renshaw, Mark A. Lodge, David M. Sci Rep Article Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can greatly enhance our understanding of global biodiversity and our ability to detect rare or cryptic species. However, sampling effort must be considered when interpreting results from these surveys. We explored how sampling effort influenced biodiversity patterns and nonindigenous species (NIS) detection in an eDNA metabarcoding survey of four commercial ports. Overall, we captured sequences from 18 metazoan phyla with minimal differences in taxonomic coverage between 18 S and COI primer sets. While community dissimilarity patterns were consistent across primers and sampling effort, richness patterns were not, suggesting that richness estimates are extremely sensitive to primer choice and sampling effort. The survey detected 64 potential NIS, with COI identifying more known NIS from port checklists but 18 S identifying more operational taxonomic units shared between three or more ports that represent un-recorded potential NIS. Overall, we conclude that eDNA metabarcoding surveys can reveal global similarity patterns among ports across a broad array of taxa and can also detect potential NIS in these key habitats. However, richness estimates and species assignments require caution. Based on results of this study, we make several recommendations for port eDNA sampling design and suggest several areas for future research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5995838/ /pubmed/29891968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27048-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Grey, Erin K. Bernatchez, Louis Cassey, Phillip Deiner, Kristy Deveney, Marty Howland, Kimberly L. Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs Leong, Sandric Chee Yew Li, Yiyuan Olds, Brett Pfrender, Michael E. Prowse, Thomas A. A. Renshaw, Mark A. Lodge, David M. Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys |
title | Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys |
title_full | Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys |
title_fullStr | Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys |
title_short | Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys |
title_sort | effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental dna metabarcoding surveys |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5995838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29891968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27048-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greyerink effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT bernatchezlouis effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT casseyphillip effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT deinerkristy effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT deveneymarty effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT howlandkimberlyl effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT lacoursiererousselanais effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT leongsandriccheeyew effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT liyiyuan effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT oldsbrett effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT pfrendermichaele effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT prowsethomasaa effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT renshawmarka effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys AT lodgedavidm effectsofsamplingeffortonbiodiversitypatternsestimatedfromenvironmentaldnametabarcodingsurveys |