Cargando…
Immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: A comparison
INTRODUCTION: The placement of implants into fresh extraction sockets was introduced in 1970. This approach has been reviewed extensively during the past decade. Immediate postextraction implant placement is a well-accepted protocol. The concept of placement of dental implants soon after the removal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5996649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937657 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_74_17 |
_version_ | 1783330916814290944 |
---|---|
author | Gangwar, Shilpi Pal, U. S. Singh, Sunita Singh, R. K. Singh, Vibha Kumar, Lakshya |
author_facet | Gangwar, Shilpi Pal, U. S. Singh, Sunita Singh, R. K. Singh, Vibha Kumar, Lakshya |
author_sort | Gangwar, Shilpi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The placement of implants into fresh extraction sockets was introduced in 1970. This approach has been reviewed extensively during the past decade. Immediate postextraction implant placement is a well-accepted protocol. The concept of placement of dental implants soon after the removal of a tooth in smokers, however, is still a matter of controversy. PURPOSE: (i) To access failure rate of dental implant in smokers (ii) To evaluate added advantage of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGFs) in immediate placement of dental implants in smokers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample of 30 patients was obtained from the different Outpatient Department of Faculty of Dental Sciences; King George's Medical University, Lucknow, who had visited for rehabilitation of missing teeth by implants between April 2013 and July 2015. They were randomly divided into two groups (without use of PRGF and with use of PRGF) of 15 each. Pre- and postoperative assessment included a thorough history and clinical examination, regression of pain and swelling, implant stability by resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and implant stability according to the bone type as well as radiographic interpretation for measurement of bone loss on the mesial and distal surfaces of the implant. RESULTS: In this study, pain and swelling were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in Group A than in Group B across the time interval. RFA score for implant stability was lower in Group A across the period than Group B. At the end of 3 months, RFA score (mean) in Group A was having 72.55 ISQ value, and in Group B, it was 75.71 ISQ value. In this study, postoperative crestal bone loss was more in patients in Group A as compared to patients in Group B. There was significant difference in mesial (P = 0.003) and distal (P = 0.001) crestal bone loss at 6 months between the groups. CONCLUSION: The immediate placement of dental implants in smokers with use of PRGF is shown to be efficient in relation to postoperative pain and swelling, stability, stability according to bone type, as well as bone loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5996649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59966492018-06-22 Immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: A comparison Gangwar, Shilpi Pal, U. S. Singh, Sunita Singh, R. K. Singh, Vibha Kumar, Lakshya Natl J Maxillofac Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: The placement of implants into fresh extraction sockets was introduced in 1970. This approach has been reviewed extensively during the past decade. Immediate postextraction implant placement is a well-accepted protocol. The concept of placement of dental implants soon after the removal of a tooth in smokers, however, is still a matter of controversy. PURPOSE: (i) To access failure rate of dental implant in smokers (ii) To evaluate added advantage of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGFs) in immediate placement of dental implants in smokers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample of 30 patients was obtained from the different Outpatient Department of Faculty of Dental Sciences; King George's Medical University, Lucknow, who had visited for rehabilitation of missing teeth by implants between April 2013 and July 2015. They were randomly divided into two groups (without use of PRGF and with use of PRGF) of 15 each. Pre- and postoperative assessment included a thorough history and clinical examination, regression of pain and swelling, implant stability by resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and implant stability according to the bone type as well as radiographic interpretation for measurement of bone loss on the mesial and distal surfaces of the implant. RESULTS: In this study, pain and swelling were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in Group A than in Group B across the time interval. RFA score for implant stability was lower in Group A across the period than Group B. At the end of 3 months, RFA score (mean) in Group A was having 72.55 ISQ value, and in Group B, it was 75.71 ISQ value. In this study, postoperative crestal bone loss was more in patients in Group A as compared to patients in Group B. There was significant difference in mesial (P = 0.003) and distal (P = 0.001) crestal bone loss at 6 months between the groups. CONCLUSION: The immediate placement of dental implants in smokers with use of PRGF is shown to be efficient in relation to postoperative pain and swelling, stability, stability according to bone type, as well as bone loss. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5996649/ /pubmed/29937657 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_74_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gangwar, Shilpi Pal, U. S. Singh, Sunita Singh, R. K. Singh, Vibha Kumar, Lakshya Immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: A comparison |
title | Immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: A comparison |
title_full | Immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: A comparison |
title_fullStr | Immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: A comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: A comparison |
title_short | Immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: A comparison |
title_sort | immediately placed dental implants in smokers with plasma rich in growth factor versus without plasma rich in growth factor: a comparison |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5996649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937657 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_74_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gangwarshilpi immediatelyplaceddentalimplantsinsmokerswithplasmarichingrowthfactorversuswithoutplasmarichingrowthfactoracomparison AT palus immediatelyplaceddentalimplantsinsmokerswithplasmarichingrowthfactorversuswithoutplasmarichingrowthfactoracomparison AT singhsunita immediatelyplaceddentalimplantsinsmokerswithplasmarichingrowthfactorversuswithoutplasmarichingrowthfactoracomparison AT singhrk immediatelyplaceddentalimplantsinsmokerswithplasmarichingrowthfactorversuswithoutplasmarichingrowthfactoracomparison AT singhvibha immediatelyplaceddentalimplantsinsmokerswithplasmarichingrowthfactorversuswithoutplasmarichingrowthfactoracomparison AT kumarlakshya immediatelyplaceddentalimplantsinsmokerswithplasmarichingrowthfactorversuswithoutplasmarichingrowthfactoracomparison |