Cargando…

Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) facilitate flexible ureteroscopy in the treat- ment of urolithiasis. The physical properties of UAS vary by manufacturer and model. We compared three new UAS: Glideway (GW, Terumo, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr), Pathway (PW, Terumo 12/14F) and Navigator HD (NHD, Bosto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Nishant, Monga, Manoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5996793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29493185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0575
_version_ 1783330941788225536
author Patel, Nishant
Monga, Manoj
author_facet Patel, Nishant
Monga, Manoj
author_sort Patel, Nishant
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) facilitate flexible ureteroscopy in the treat- ment of urolithiasis. The physical properties of UAS vary by manufacturer and model. We compared three new UAS: Glideway (GW, Terumo, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr), Pathway (PW, Terumo 12/14F) and Navigator HD (NHD, Boston Scientific, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr) in the domains of safety characteristics, positioning characteristics, lubricity and radio- opacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro testing of the three UAS included safety testing-tip perforation force, sheath edge deformation and dilator extraction forces. Positioning characteristics tested included tip bending, stiffness (resistance to coaxial buckling forces), kinking (resistance to perpendicular forces), and insertion forces. Lubricity was assessed by measured frictional forces of the outer sheath. Finally, radio-opacity was tested utilizing fluoroscopic imaging of the three 12F sheaths and inner dilators. RESULTS: The PW (0.245 lb) and GW (0.286 lb) required less force for tip perforation compared to the NHD (0.628 lb). The NHD sheath edge deformation was mild compared to more severe deformation for the PW and GW. The PW (1.008 lb) required greater force than the GW (0.136 lb) and NHD (0.043 lb) for inner dilator removal. The GW (3.69 lbs) and NHD (4.17 lb) had similar inner dilator tip stiffness when bent, while the PW had the weakest inner dilator tip, 1.91 lbs. The PW (0.271 lb) was most susceptible to buckling and kinking (1.626 lb). The most lubricious UAS was the NHD (0.055 lbs for 12F). The NHD (0.277 lbs) required the least insertional force through a biological model and possessed the greatest radio-opacity. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of different commercially available UAS in various sizes reveals that there are mechanical differences in sheaths that may play a role clinically. The Terumo sheaths' (GW and PW) were outperformed by the Boston Scientific NHD in simulating safety, ease of use and radio-opacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5996793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59967932018-06-13 Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties Patel, Nishant Monga, Manoj Int Braz J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) facilitate flexible ureteroscopy in the treat- ment of urolithiasis. The physical properties of UAS vary by manufacturer and model. We compared three new UAS: Glideway (GW, Terumo, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr), Pathway (PW, Terumo 12/14F) and Navigator HD (NHD, Boston Scientific, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr) in the domains of safety characteristics, positioning characteristics, lubricity and radio- opacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro testing of the three UAS included safety testing-tip perforation force, sheath edge deformation and dilator extraction forces. Positioning characteristics tested included tip bending, stiffness (resistance to coaxial buckling forces), kinking (resistance to perpendicular forces), and insertion forces. Lubricity was assessed by measured frictional forces of the outer sheath. Finally, radio-opacity was tested utilizing fluoroscopic imaging of the three 12F sheaths and inner dilators. RESULTS: The PW (0.245 lb) and GW (0.286 lb) required less force for tip perforation compared to the NHD (0.628 lb). The NHD sheath edge deformation was mild compared to more severe deformation for the PW and GW. The PW (1.008 lb) required greater force than the GW (0.136 lb) and NHD (0.043 lb) for inner dilator removal. The GW (3.69 lbs) and NHD (4.17 lb) had similar inner dilator tip stiffness when bent, while the PW had the weakest inner dilator tip, 1.91 lbs. The PW (0.271 lb) was most susceptible to buckling and kinking (1.626 lb). The most lubricious UAS was the NHD (0.055 lbs for 12F). The NHD (0.277 lbs) required the least insertional force through a biological model and possessed the greatest radio-opacity. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of different commercially available UAS in various sizes reveals that there are mechanical differences in sheaths that may play a role clinically. The Terumo sheaths' (GW and PW) were outperformed by the Boston Scientific NHD in simulating safety, ease of use and radio-opacity. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5996793/ /pubmed/29493185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0575 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Nishant
Monga, Manoj
Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties
title Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties
title_full Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties
title_fullStr Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties
title_full_unstemmed Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties
title_short Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties
title_sort ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5996793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29493185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0575
work_keys_str_mv AT patelnishant ureteralaccesssheathsacomprehensivecomparisonofphysicalandmechanicalproperties
AT mongamanoj ureteralaccesssheathsacomprehensivecomparisonofphysicalandmechanicalproperties