Cargando…

Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of fetal anomaly is a significant life event and social stigma can negatively impact on the well-being of women opting for an abortion. This study investigated the psychometric properties of a measure of stigma among women who had had an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanschmidt, Franz, Nagl, Michaela, Klingner, Johanna, Stepan, Holger, Kersting, Anette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29894474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197986
_version_ 1783331027672891392
author Hanschmidt, Franz
Nagl, Michaela
Klingner, Johanna
Stepan, Holger
Kersting, Anette
author_facet Hanschmidt, Franz
Nagl, Michaela
Klingner, Johanna
Stepan, Holger
Kersting, Anette
author_sort Hanschmidt, Franz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of fetal anomaly is a significant life event and social stigma can negatively impact on the well-being of women opting for an abortion. This study investigated the psychometric properties of a measure of stigma among women who had had an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly in a German setting. METHODS: The Individual Level Abortion Stigma (ILAS) scale was translated into German. Psychometric properties of the ILAS scale were examined among 130 women with a history of an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Individual and situational factors associated with stigma in the context of an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly were explored. RESULTS: Factor analysis suggested a four-dimensional structure of the German version of the Individual Level Abortion Stigma scale (Cronbach’s α, .83–.91), corresponding to the subscales of the original scale. Test-retest reliability was acceptable for the worries about judgment subscale, the self-judgment subscale, and the community condemnation subscale, but less convincing for the isolation subscale. Associations between the subscales and measures of depression, self-esteem and secrecy were found in directions consistent with theory. Women who did not perceive their fetus to have a low survival chance and women whose fetus was at higher gestational age reported higher levels of stigma, whereas higher perceived partner support was associated with lower levels of stigma. LIMITATION: Generalizability of study results was limited, as participants were recruited from one clinic in Germany and the study had a response rate of 46.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The ILAS subscales are largely reliable and valid measures to assess stigma among women who have had an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Suggestions for improving the assessment of stigma experienced in this population are outlined. The scales can be useful in research aiming at investigating psychological outcomes of abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly and improving care structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5997354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59973542018-06-21 Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale Hanschmidt, Franz Nagl, Michaela Klingner, Johanna Stepan, Holger Kersting, Anette PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of fetal anomaly is a significant life event and social stigma can negatively impact on the well-being of women opting for an abortion. This study investigated the psychometric properties of a measure of stigma among women who had had an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly in a German setting. METHODS: The Individual Level Abortion Stigma (ILAS) scale was translated into German. Psychometric properties of the ILAS scale were examined among 130 women with a history of an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Individual and situational factors associated with stigma in the context of an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly were explored. RESULTS: Factor analysis suggested a four-dimensional structure of the German version of the Individual Level Abortion Stigma scale (Cronbach’s α, .83–.91), corresponding to the subscales of the original scale. Test-retest reliability was acceptable for the worries about judgment subscale, the self-judgment subscale, and the community condemnation subscale, but less convincing for the isolation subscale. Associations between the subscales and measures of depression, self-esteem and secrecy were found in directions consistent with theory. Women who did not perceive their fetus to have a low survival chance and women whose fetus was at higher gestational age reported higher levels of stigma, whereas higher perceived partner support was associated with lower levels of stigma. LIMITATION: Generalizability of study results was limited, as participants were recruited from one clinic in Germany and the study had a response rate of 46.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The ILAS subscales are largely reliable and valid measures to assess stigma among women who have had an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Suggestions for improving the assessment of stigma experienced in this population are outlined. The scales can be useful in research aiming at investigating psychological outcomes of abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly and improving care structures. Public Library of Science 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5997354/ /pubmed/29894474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197986 Text en © 2018 Hanschmidt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanschmidt, Franz
Nagl, Michaela
Klingner, Johanna
Stepan, Holger
Kersting, Anette
Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale
title Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale
title_full Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale
title_fullStr Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale
title_full_unstemmed Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale
title_short Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale
title_sort abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: psychometric properties of a german version of the individual level abortion stigma scale
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29894474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197986
work_keys_str_mv AT hanschmidtfranz abortionafterdiagnosisoffetalanomalypsychometricpropertiesofagermanversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascale
AT naglmichaela abortionafterdiagnosisoffetalanomalypsychometricpropertiesofagermanversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascale
AT klingnerjohanna abortionafterdiagnosisoffetalanomalypsychometricpropertiesofagermanversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascale
AT stepanholger abortionafterdiagnosisoffetalanomalypsychometricpropertiesofagermanversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascale
AT kerstinganette abortionafterdiagnosisoffetalanomalypsychometricpropertiesofagermanversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascale