Cargando…

Critical Event Intervals in Determining Candidacy for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine the optimal set point for the critical event benchmarks described in stroke guidelines and validate the ability of these goals to predict successful administration of intravenous thrombolysis within 60 min of hospital arrival. METHODS: This was a ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garrett, John S., Sonnamaker, Steven, Daoud, Yahya, Wang, Hao, Graybeal, Dion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904443
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3425w
_version_ 1783331042553233408
author Garrett, John S.
Sonnamaker, Steven
Daoud, Yahya
Wang, Hao
Graybeal, Dion
author_facet Garrett, John S.
Sonnamaker, Steven
Daoud, Yahya
Wang, Hao
Graybeal, Dion
author_sort Garrett, John S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine the optimal set point for the critical event benchmarks described in stroke guidelines and validate the ability of these goals to predict successful administration of intravenous thrombolysis within 60 min of hospital arrival. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis following presentation to the emergency department. The national benchmarks for time intervals associated with the completion of critical events required to determine candidacy for thrombolysis were evaluated for the ability to predict successful administration of thrombolysis within 60 min of hospital arrival. Optimal time interval cut points were then estimated using regression and receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis and compared to guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 523 patients included in the analysis, 229 (43.8%) received intravenous thrombolysis within 60 min of hospital arrival. Of the patients who met the critical event interval goals described in guidelines, only 51.6% received thrombolysis within 60 min. The optimized cut points suggested by the regression analysis aligned with the guideline benchmarks with the only substantial difference being a shortened goal of arrival to neuroimaging start time of 19 min. This difference did not impact the overall predictive value. CONCLUSION: The critical event benchmarks proposed in this study by logistic regression closely correlate with the critical event benchmarks described in the AHA/ASA acute stroke guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5997418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59974182018-06-14 Critical Event Intervals in Determining Candidacy for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke Garrett, John S. Sonnamaker, Steven Daoud, Yahya Wang, Hao Graybeal, Dion J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine the optimal set point for the critical event benchmarks described in stroke guidelines and validate the ability of these goals to predict successful administration of intravenous thrombolysis within 60 min of hospital arrival. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis following presentation to the emergency department. The national benchmarks for time intervals associated with the completion of critical events required to determine candidacy for thrombolysis were evaluated for the ability to predict successful administration of thrombolysis within 60 min of hospital arrival. Optimal time interval cut points were then estimated using regression and receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis and compared to guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 523 patients included in the analysis, 229 (43.8%) received intravenous thrombolysis within 60 min of hospital arrival. Of the patients who met the critical event interval goals described in guidelines, only 51.6% received thrombolysis within 60 min. The optimized cut points suggested by the regression analysis aligned with the guideline benchmarks with the only substantial difference being a shortened goal of arrival to neuroimaging start time of 19 min. This difference did not impact the overall predictive value. CONCLUSION: The critical event benchmarks proposed in this study by logistic regression closely correlate with the critical event benchmarks described in the AHA/ASA acute stroke guidelines. Elmer Press 2018-07 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5997418/ /pubmed/29904443 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3425w Text en Copyright 2018, Garrett et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Garrett, John S.
Sonnamaker, Steven
Daoud, Yahya
Wang, Hao
Graybeal, Dion
Critical Event Intervals in Determining Candidacy for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke
title Critical Event Intervals in Determining Candidacy for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke
title_full Critical Event Intervals in Determining Candidacy for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke
title_fullStr Critical Event Intervals in Determining Candidacy for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Critical Event Intervals in Determining Candidacy for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke
title_short Critical Event Intervals in Determining Candidacy for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke
title_sort critical event intervals in determining candidacy for intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904443
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3425w
work_keys_str_mv AT garrettjohns criticaleventintervalsindeterminingcandidacyforintravenousthrombolysisinacutestroke
AT sonnamakersteven criticaleventintervalsindeterminingcandidacyforintravenousthrombolysisinacutestroke
AT daoudyahya criticaleventintervalsindeterminingcandidacyforintravenousthrombolysisinacutestroke
AT wanghao criticaleventintervalsindeterminingcandidacyforintravenousthrombolysisinacutestroke
AT graybealdion criticaleventintervalsindeterminingcandidacyforintravenousthrombolysisinacutestroke