Cargando…

Influence of Carbon Deposits on the Cobalt-Catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch Reaction: Evidence of a Two-Site Reaction Model

[Image: see text] One of the well-known observations in the Fischer–Tropsch (FT) reaction is that the CH(4) selectivity for cobalt catalysts is always higher than the value expected on the basis of the Anderson–Schulz–Flory (ASF) distribution. Depositing graphitic carbon on a cobalt catalyst strongl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Wei, Kimpel, Tobias F., Song, Yuanjun, Chiang, Fu-Kuo, Zijlstra, Bart, Pestman, Robert, Wang, Peng, Hensen, Emiel J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03639
_version_ 1783331052813549568
author Chen, Wei
Kimpel, Tobias F.
Song, Yuanjun
Chiang, Fu-Kuo
Zijlstra, Bart
Pestman, Robert
Wang, Peng
Hensen, Emiel J. M.
author_facet Chen, Wei
Kimpel, Tobias F.
Song, Yuanjun
Chiang, Fu-Kuo
Zijlstra, Bart
Pestman, Robert
Wang, Peng
Hensen, Emiel J. M.
author_sort Chen, Wei
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] One of the well-known observations in the Fischer–Tropsch (FT) reaction is that the CH(4) selectivity for cobalt catalysts is always higher than the value expected on the basis of the Anderson–Schulz–Flory (ASF) distribution. Depositing graphitic carbon on a cobalt catalyst strongly suppresses this non-ASF CH(4), while the formation of higher hydrocarbons is much less affected. Carbon was laid down on the cobalt catalyst via the Boudouard reaction. We provide evidence that the amorphous carbon does not influence the FT reaction, as it can be easily hydrogenated under reaction conditions. Graphitic carbon is rapidly formed and cannot be removed. This unreactive form of carbon is located on terrace sites and mainly decreases the CO conversion by limiting CH(4) formation. Despite nearly unchanged higher hydrocarbon yield, the presence of graphitic carbon enhances the chain-growth probability and strongly suppresses olefin hydrogenation. We demonstrate that graphitic carbon will slowly deposit on the cobalt catalysts during CO hydrogenation, thereby influencing CO conversion and the FT product distribution in a way similar to that for predeposited graphitic carbon. We also demonstrate that the buildup of graphitic carbon by (13)CO increases the rate of C–C coupling during the (12)C(3)H(6) hydrogenation reaction, whose products follow an ASF-type product distribution of the FT reaction. We explain these results by a two-site model on the basis of insights into structure sensitivity of the underlying reaction steps in the FT mechanism: carbon formed on step-edge sites is involved in chain growth or can migrate to terrace sites, where it is rapidly hydrogenated to CH(4). The primary olefinic FT products are predominantly hydrogenated on terrace sites. Covering the terraces by graphitic carbon increases the residence time of CH(x) intermediates, in line with decreased CH(4) selectivity and increased chain-growth rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5997462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59974622018-06-13 Influence of Carbon Deposits on the Cobalt-Catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch Reaction: Evidence of a Two-Site Reaction Model Chen, Wei Kimpel, Tobias F. Song, Yuanjun Chiang, Fu-Kuo Zijlstra, Bart Pestman, Robert Wang, Peng Hensen, Emiel J. M. ACS Catal [Image: see text] One of the well-known observations in the Fischer–Tropsch (FT) reaction is that the CH(4) selectivity for cobalt catalysts is always higher than the value expected on the basis of the Anderson–Schulz–Flory (ASF) distribution. Depositing graphitic carbon on a cobalt catalyst strongly suppresses this non-ASF CH(4), while the formation of higher hydrocarbons is much less affected. Carbon was laid down on the cobalt catalyst via the Boudouard reaction. We provide evidence that the amorphous carbon does not influence the FT reaction, as it can be easily hydrogenated under reaction conditions. Graphitic carbon is rapidly formed and cannot be removed. This unreactive form of carbon is located on terrace sites and mainly decreases the CO conversion by limiting CH(4) formation. Despite nearly unchanged higher hydrocarbon yield, the presence of graphitic carbon enhances the chain-growth probability and strongly suppresses olefin hydrogenation. We demonstrate that graphitic carbon will slowly deposit on the cobalt catalysts during CO hydrogenation, thereby influencing CO conversion and the FT product distribution in a way similar to that for predeposited graphitic carbon. We also demonstrate that the buildup of graphitic carbon by (13)CO increases the rate of C–C coupling during the (12)C(3)H(6) hydrogenation reaction, whose products follow an ASF-type product distribution of the FT reaction. We explain these results by a two-site model on the basis of insights into structure sensitivity of the underlying reaction steps in the FT mechanism: carbon formed on step-edge sites is involved in chain growth or can migrate to terrace sites, where it is rapidly hydrogenated to CH(4). The primary olefinic FT products are predominantly hydrogenated on terrace sites. Covering the terraces by graphitic carbon increases the residence time of CH(x) intermediates, in line with decreased CH(4) selectivity and increased chain-growth rate. American Chemical Society 2017-12-15 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5997462/ /pubmed/29910971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03639 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Chen, Wei
Kimpel, Tobias F.
Song, Yuanjun
Chiang, Fu-Kuo
Zijlstra, Bart
Pestman, Robert
Wang, Peng
Hensen, Emiel J. M.
Influence of Carbon Deposits on the Cobalt-Catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch Reaction: Evidence of a Two-Site Reaction Model
title Influence of Carbon Deposits on the Cobalt-Catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch Reaction: Evidence of a Two-Site Reaction Model
title_full Influence of Carbon Deposits on the Cobalt-Catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch Reaction: Evidence of a Two-Site Reaction Model
title_fullStr Influence of Carbon Deposits on the Cobalt-Catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch Reaction: Evidence of a Two-Site Reaction Model
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Carbon Deposits on the Cobalt-Catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch Reaction: Evidence of a Two-Site Reaction Model
title_short Influence of Carbon Deposits on the Cobalt-Catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch Reaction: Evidence of a Two-Site Reaction Model
title_sort influence of carbon deposits on the cobalt-catalyzed fischer–tropsch reaction: evidence of a two-site reaction model
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03639
work_keys_str_mv AT chenwei influenceofcarbondepositsonthecobaltcatalyzedfischertropschreactionevidenceofatwositereactionmodel
AT kimpeltobiasf influenceofcarbondepositsonthecobaltcatalyzedfischertropschreactionevidenceofatwositereactionmodel
AT songyuanjun influenceofcarbondepositsonthecobaltcatalyzedfischertropschreactionevidenceofatwositereactionmodel
AT chiangfukuo influenceofcarbondepositsonthecobaltcatalyzedfischertropschreactionevidenceofatwositereactionmodel
AT zijlstrabart influenceofcarbondepositsonthecobaltcatalyzedfischertropschreactionevidenceofatwositereactionmodel
AT pestmanrobert influenceofcarbondepositsonthecobaltcatalyzedfischertropschreactionevidenceofatwositereactionmodel
AT wangpeng influenceofcarbondepositsonthecobaltcatalyzedfischertropschreactionevidenceofatwositereactionmodel
AT hensenemieljm influenceofcarbondepositsonthecobaltcatalyzedfischertropschreactionevidenceofatwositereactionmodel