Cargando…
The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used in heterogeneous patient populations. PROM scores may lead to biased inferences when sources of heterogeneity (e.g., gender, ethnicity, and social factors) are ignored. Latent variable mixture models (LVMMs) can be used to examin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1680-8 |
_version_ | 1783331094194552832 |
---|---|
author | Sawatzky, Richard Russell, Lara B. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Lix, Lisa M. Kopec, Jacek Zumbo, Bruno D. |
author_facet | Sawatzky, Richard Russell, Lara B. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Lix, Lisa M. Kopec, Jacek Zumbo, Bruno D. |
author_sort | Sawatzky, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used in heterogeneous patient populations. PROM scores may lead to biased inferences when sources of heterogeneity (e.g., gender, ethnicity, and social factors) are ignored. Latent variable mixture models (LVMMs) can be used to examine measurement invariance (MI) when sources of heterogeneity in the population are not known a priori. The goal of this article is to discuss the use of LVMMs to identify invariant items within the context of test construction. METHODS: The Draper-Lindely-de Finetti (DLD) framework for the measurement of latent variables provides a theoretical context for the use of LVMMs to identify the most invariant items in test construction. In an expository analysis using 39 items measuring daily activities, LVMMs were conducted to compare 1- and 2-class item response theory models (IRT). If the 2-class model had better fit, item-level logistic regression differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were conducted to identify items that were not invariant. These items were removed and LVMMs and DIF testing repeated until all remaining items showed MI. RESULTS: The 39 items had an essentially unidimensional measurement structure. However, a 1-class IRT model resulted in many statistically significant bivariate residuals, indicating suboptimal fit due to remaining local dependence. A 2-class LVMM had better fit. Through subsequent rounds of LVMMs and DIF testing, nine items were identified as being most invariant. CONCLUSIONS: The DLD framework and the use of LVMMs have significant potential for advancing theoretical developments and research on item selection and the development of PROMs for heterogeneous populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5997718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59977182018-06-25 The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction Sawatzky, Richard Russell, Lara B. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Lix, Lisa M. Kopec, Jacek Zumbo, Bruno D. Qual Life Res Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only) PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used in heterogeneous patient populations. PROM scores may lead to biased inferences when sources of heterogeneity (e.g., gender, ethnicity, and social factors) are ignored. Latent variable mixture models (LVMMs) can be used to examine measurement invariance (MI) when sources of heterogeneity in the population are not known a priori. The goal of this article is to discuss the use of LVMMs to identify invariant items within the context of test construction. METHODS: The Draper-Lindely-de Finetti (DLD) framework for the measurement of latent variables provides a theoretical context for the use of LVMMs to identify the most invariant items in test construction. In an expository analysis using 39 items measuring daily activities, LVMMs were conducted to compare 1- and 2-class item response theory models (IRT). If the 2-class model had better fit, item-level logistic regression differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were conducted to identify items that were not invariant. These items were removed and LVMMs and DIF testing repeated until all remaining items showed MI. RESULTS: The 39 items had an essentially unidimensional measurement structure. However, a 1-class IRT model resulted in many statistically significant bivariate residuals, indicating suboptimal fit due to remaining local dependence. A 2-class LVMM had better fit. Through subsequent rounds of LVMMs and DIF testing, nine items were identified as being most invariant. CONCLUSIONS: The DLD framework and the use of LVMMs have significant potential for advancing theoretical developments and research on item selection and the development of PROMs for heterogeneous populations. Springer International Publishing 2017-08-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5997718/ /pubmed/28836090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1680-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only) Sawatzky, Richard Russell, Lara B. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Lix, Lisa M. Kopec, Jacek Zumbo, Bruno D. The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction |
title | The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction |
title_full | The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction |
title_fullStr | The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction |
title_short | The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction |
title_sort | use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction |
topic | Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1680-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sawatzkyrichard theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT russelllarab theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT sajobitolulopet theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT lixlisam theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT kopecjacek theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT zumbobrunod theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT sawatzkyrichard useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT russelllarab useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT sajobitolulopet useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT lixlisam useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT kopecjacek useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction AT zumbobrunod useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction |