Cargando…

The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used in heterogeneous patient populations. PROM scores may lead to biased inferences when sources of heterogeneity (e.g., gender, ethnicity, and social factors) are ignored. Latent variable mixture models (LVMMs) can be used to examin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawatzky, Richard, Russell, Lara B., Sajobi, Tolulope T., Lix, Lisa M., Kopec, Jacek, Zumbo, Bruno D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1680-8
_version_ 1783331094194552832
author Sawatzky, Richard
Russell, Lara B.
Sajobi, Tolulope T.
Lix, Lisa M.
Kopec, Jacek
Zumbo, Bruno D.
author_facet Sawatzky, Richard
Russell, Lara B.
Sajobi, Tolulope T.
Lix, Lisa M.
Kopec, Jacek
Zumbo, Bruno D.
author_sort Sawatzky, Richard
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used in heterogeneous patient populations. PROM scores may lead to biased inferences when sources of heterogeneity (e.g., gender, ethnicity, and social factors) are ignored. Latent variable mixture models (LVMMs) can be used to examine measurement invariance (MI) when sources of heterogeneity in the population are not known a priori. The goal of this article is to discuss the use of LVMMs to identify invariant items within the context of test construction. METHODS: The Draper-Lindely-de Finetti (DLD) framework for the measurement of latent variables provides a theoretical context for the use of LVMMs to identify the most invariant items in test construction. In an expository analysis using 39 items measuring daily activities, LVMMs were conducted to compare 1- and 2-class item response theory models (IRT). If the 2-class model had better fit, item-level logistic regression differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were conducted to identify items that were not invariant. These items were removed and LVMMs and DIF testing repeated until all remaining items showed MI. RESULTS: The 39 items had an essentially unidimensional measurement structure. However, a 1-class IRT model resulted in many statistically significant bivariate residuals, indicating suboptimal fit due to remaining local dependence. A 2-class LVMM had better fit. Through subsequent rounds of LVMMs and DIF testing, nine items were identified as being most invariant. CONCLUSIONS: The DLD framework and the use of LVMMs have significant potential for advancing theoretical developments and research on item selection and the development of PROMs for heterogeneous populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5997718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59977182018-06-25 The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction Sawatzky, Richard Russell, Lara B. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Lix, Lisa M. Kopec, Jacek Zumbo, Bruno D. Qual Life Res Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only) PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used in heterogeneous patient populations. PROM scores may lead to biased inferences when sources of heterogeneity (e.g., gender, ethnicity, and social factors) are ignored. Latent variable mixture models (LVMMs) can be used to examine measurement invariance (MI) when sources of heterogeneity in the population are not known a priori. The goal of this article is to discuss the use of LVMMs to identify invariant items within the context of test construction. METHODS: The Draper-Lindely-de Finetti (DLD) framework for the measurement of latent variables provides a theoretical context for the use of LVMMs to identify the most invariant items in test construction. In an expository analysis using 39 items measuring daily activities, LVMMs were conducted to compare 1- and 2-class item response theory models (IRT). If the 2-class model had better fit, item-level logistic regression differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were conducted to identify items that were not invariant. These items were removed and LVMMs and DIF testing repeated until all remaining items showed MI. RESULTS: The 39 items had an essentially unidimensional measurement structure. However, a 1-class IRT model resulted in many statistically significant bivariate residuals, indicating suboptimal fit due to remaining local dependence. A 2-class LVMM had better fit. Through subsequent rounds of LVMMs and DIF testing, nine items were identified as being most invariant. CONCLUSIONS: The DLD framework and the use of LVMMs have significant potential for advancing theoretical developments and research on item selection and the development of PROMs for heterogeneous populations. Springer International Publishing 2017-08-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5997718/ /pubmed/28836090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1680-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only)
Sawatzky, Richard
Russell, Lara B.
Sajobi, Tolulope T.
Lix, Lisa M.
Kopec, Jacek
Zumbo, Bruno D.
The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction
title The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction
title_full The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction
title_fullStr The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction
title_full_unstemmed The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction
title_short The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction
title_sort use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction
topic Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1680-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sawatzkyrichard theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT russelllarab theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT sajobitolulopet theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT lixlisam theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT kopecjacek theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT zumbobrunod theuseoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT sawatzkyrichard useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT russelllarab useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT sajobitolulopet useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT lixlisam useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT kopecjacek useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction
AT zumbobrunod useoflatentvariablemixturemodelstoidentifyinvariantitemsintestconstruction