Cargando…

Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph-node assessment is considered one of the most important prognostic factors concerning breast cancer survival. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the discriminative power of morphological and functional features in assessing the axillary lymph node. METHODS: We retrospectively anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fusco, Roberta, Sansone, Mario, Granata, Vincenza, Di Bonito, Maurizio, Avino, Franca, Catalano, Orlando, Botti, Gerardo, Petrillo, Antonella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30003092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2610801
_version_ 1783331196877406208
author Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Di Bonito, Maurizio
Avino, Franca
Catalano, Orlando
Botti, Gerardo
Petrillo, Antonella
author_facet Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Di Bonito, Maurizio
Avino, Franca
Catalano, Orlando
Botti, Gerardo
Petrillo, Antonella
author_sort Fusco, Roberta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph-node assessment is considered one of the most important prognostic factors concerning breast cancer survival. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the discriminative power of morphological and functional features in assessing the axillary lymph node. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 52 consecutive patients who undergone DCE-MRI and were diagnosed with primary breast carcinoma: 94 lymph nodes were identified. Per each lymph node, we extracted morphological features: circularity, compactness, convexity, curvature, elongation, diameter, eccentricity, irregularity, radial length, entropy, rectangularity, roughness, smoothness, sphericity, spiculation, surface, and volume. Moreover, we extracted functional features: time to peak (TTP), maximum signal difference (MSD), wash-in intercept (WII), wash-out intercept (WOI), wash-in slope (WIS), wash-out slope (WOS), area under gadolinium curve (AUGC), area under wash-in (AUWI), and area under wash-out (AUWO). Selection of important features in predicting metastasis has been done by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Performance of linear discriminant analysis was analysed. RESULTS: All morphological features but circularity showed a significant difference between median values of metastatic lymph nodes group and nonmetastatic lymph nodes group. All dynamic parameters except for MSD and WOS showed a statistically significant difference between median values of metastatic lymph nodes group and nonmetastatic lymph nodes group. Best results for discrimination of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were obtained by AUGC (accuracy 75.8%), WIS (accuracy 71.0%), WOS (accuracy 71.0%), and AUCWO (accuracy 72.6%) for dynamic features and by compactness (accuracy 82.3%), curvature (accuracy 71.0%), radial length (accuracy 71.0%), roughness (accuracy 74.2%), smoothness (accuracy 77.2%), and speculation (accuracy 72.6%) for morphological features. Linear combination of all morphological and/or of all dynamic features did not increase accuracy in metastatic lymph nodes discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Compactness as morphological feature and area under time-intensity curve as dynamic feature were the best parameters in identifying metastatic lymph nodes on breast MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5998166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59981662018-07-12 Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Granata, Vincenza Di Bonito, Maurizio Avino, Franca Catalano, Orlando Botti, Gerardo Petrillo, Antonella Biomed Res Int Review Article BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph-node assessment is considered one of the most important prognostic factors concerning breast cancer survival. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the discriminative power of morphological and functional features in assessing the axillary lymph node. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 52 consecutive patients who undergone DCE-MRI and were diagnosed with primary breast carcinoma: 94 lymph nodes were identified. Per each lymph node, we extracted morphological features: circularity, compactness, convexity, curvature, elongation, diameter, eccentricity, irregularity, radial length, entropy, rectangularity, roughness, smoothness, sphericity, spiculation, surface, and volume. Moreover, we extracted functional features: time to peak (TTP), maximum signal difference (MSD), wash-in intercept (WII), wash-out intercept (WOI), wash-in slope (WIS), wash-out slope (WOS), area under gadolinium curve (AUGC), area under wash-in (AUWI), and area under wash-out (AUWO). Selection of important features in predicting metastasis has been done by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Performance of linear discriminant analysis was analysed. RESULTS: All morphological features but circularity showed a significant difference between median values of metastatic lymph nodes group and nonmetastatic lymph nodes group. All dynamic parameters except for MSD and WOS showed a statistically significant difference between median values of metastatic lymph nodes group and nonmetastatic lymph nodes group. Best results for discrimination of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were obtained by AUGC (accuracy 75.8%), WIS (accuracy 71.0%), WOS (accuracy 71.0%), and AUCWO (accuracy 72.6%) for dynamic features and by compactness (accuracy 82.3%), curvature (accuracy 71.0%), radial length (accuracy 71.0%), roughness (accuracy 74.2%), smoothness (accuracy 77.2%), and speculation (accuracy 72.6%) for morphological features. Linear combination of all morphological and/or of all dynamic features did not increase accuracy in metastatic lymph nodes discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Compactness as morphological feature and area under time-intensity curve as dynamic feature were the best parameters in identifying metastatic lymph nodes on breast MRI. Hindawi 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5998166/ /pubmed/30003092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2610801 Text en Copyright © 2018 Roberta Fusco et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Di Bonito, Maurizio
Avino, Franca
Catalano, Orlando
Botti, Gerardo
Petrillo, Antonella
Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort use of quantitative morphological and functional features for assessment of axillary lymph node in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30003092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2610801
work_keys_str_mv AT fuscoroberta useofquantitativemorphologicalandfunctionalfeaturesforassessmentofaxillarylymphnodeinbreastdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sansonemario useofquantitativemorphologicalandfunctionalfeaturesforassessmentofaxillarylymphnodeinbreastdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT granatavincenza useofquantitativemorphologicalandfunctionalfeaturesforassessmentofaxillarylymphnodeinbreastdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT dibonitomaurizio useofquantitativemorphologicalandfunctionalfeaturesforassessmentofaxillarylymphnodeinbreastdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT avinofranca useofquantitativemorphologicalandfunctionalfeaturesforassessmentofaxillarylymphnodeinbreastdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT catalanoorlando useofquantitativemorphologicalandfunctionalfeaturesforassessmentofaxillarylymphnodeinbreastdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT bottigerardo useofquantitativemorphologicalandfunctionalfeaturesforassessmentofaxillarylymphnodeinbreastdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT petrilloantonella useofquantitativemorphologicalandfunctionalfeaturesforassessmentofaxillarylymphnodeinbreastdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaging