Cargando…
Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using Amigo(®) system versus manual approach: A pilot study
BACKGROUND: The Amigo(®) Remote Catheter System is a relatively new robotic system for catheter navigation. This study compared feasibility and safety using Amigo (RCM) versus manual catheter manipulation (MCM) to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Contact force (CF) and force-time integral...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.001 |
_version_ | 1783331205210439680 |
---|---|
author | Scarà, Antonio Sciarra, Luigi De Ruvo, Ermenegildo Borrelli, Alessio Grieco, Domenico Palamà, Zefferino Golia, Paolo De Luca, Lucia Rebecchi, Marco Calò, Leonardo |
author_facet | Scarà, Antonio Sciarra, Luigi De Ruvo, Ermenegildo Borrelli, Alessio Grieco, Domenico Palamà, Zefferino Golia, Paolo De Luca, Lucia Rebecchi, Marco Calò, Leonardo |
author_sort | Scarà, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Amigo(®) Remote Catheter System is a relatively new robotic system for catheter navigation. This study compared feasibility and safety using Amigo (RCM) versus manual catheter manipulation (MCM) to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Contact force (CF) and force-time integral (FTI) values obtained during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation were compared. METHODS: Forty patients were randomly selected for either RCM (20) or MCM (20). All were studied with the Thermocool(®) SmartTouch(®) force-sensing catheter (STc). Contact Force (CF), Force Time Integral (FTI) and procedure-related data, were measured/stored in the CARTO(®)3. RESULTS: All cases achieved complete PVI without major complications. Mean CF was significantly higher in the RCM group (13.3 ± 7.7 g in RCM vs. 12.04 ± 7.42 g in MCM p < 0.001), as was overall mean FTI (425.6 gs ± 199.6 gs with RCM and 407.5 gs ± 288.0 gs in MCM (p = 0.007) and was more likely to fall into the optimal FTI range (400-1000) using RCM (66.1% versus 49.1%, p < 0.001). FTI was significantly more likely to fall within the optimal range in each PV, as was CF within its optimal range in the right PVs, but trended higher in the left PVs. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was 90.0% for the RCM and 70.0% for the MCM group (p = 0,12) at 540 days follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that use of the Amigo RCM system, with STc catheter, seems to be safe and effective for PVI ablation in paroxysmal AF patients. A not statistically significant favorable trend was observed for RCM in term of AF-free survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5998200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59982002018-06-14 Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using Amigo(®) system versus manual approach: A pilot study Scarà, Antonio Sciarra, Luigi De Ruvo, Ermenegildo Borrelli, Alessio Grieco, Domenico Palamà, Zefferino Golia, Paolo De Luca, Lucia Rebecchi, Marco Calò, Leonardo Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article BACKGROUND: The Amigo(®) Remote Catheter System is a relatively new robotic system for catheter navigation. This study compared feasibility and safety using Amigo (RCM) versus manual catheter manipulation (MCM) to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Contact force (CF) and force-time integral (FTI) values obtained during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation were compared. METHODS: Forty patients were randomly selected for either RCM (20) or MCM (20). All were studied with the Thermocool(®) SmartTouch(®) force-sensing catheter (STc). Contact Force (CF), Force Time Integral (FTI) and procedure-related data, were measured/stored in the CARTO(®)3. RESULTS: All cases achieved complete PVI without major complications. Mean CF was significantly higher in the RCM group (13.3 ± 7.7 g in RCM vs. 12.04 ± 7.42 g in MCM p < 0.001), as was overall mean FTI (425.6 gs ± 199.6 gs with RCM and 407.5 gs ± 288.0 gs in MCM (p = 0.007) and was more likely to fall into the optimal FTI range (400-1000) using RCM (66.1% versus 49.1%, p < 0.001). FTI was significantly more likely to fall within the optimal range in each PV, as was CF within its optimal range in the right PVs, but trended higher in the left PVs. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was 90.0% for the RCM and 70.0% for the MCM group (p = 0,12) at 540 days follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that use of the Amigo RCM system, with STc catheter, seems to be safe and effective for PVI ablation in paroxysmal AF patients. A not statistically significant favorable trend was observed for RCM in term of AF-free survival. Elsevier 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5998200/ /pubmed/29102650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.001 Text en Copyright © 2017, Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Scarà, Antonio Sciarra, Luigi De Ruvo, Ermenegildo Borrelli, Alessio Grieco, Domenico Palamà, Zefferino Golia, Paolo De Luca, Lucia Rebecchi, Marco Calò, Leonardo Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using Amigo(®) system versus manual approach: A pilot study |
title | Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using Amigo(®) system versus manual approach: A pilot study |
title_full | Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using Amigo(®) system versus manual approach: A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using Amigo(®) system versus manual approach: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using Amigo(®) system versus manual approach: A pilot study |
title_short | Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using Amigo(®) system versus manual approach: A pilot study |
title_sort | safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation using amigo(®) system versus manual approach: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scaraantonio safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT sciarraluigi safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT deruvoermenegildo safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT borrellialessio safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT griecodomenico safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT palamazefferino safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT goliapaolo safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT delucalucia safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT rebecchimarco safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy AT caloleonardo safetyandfeasibilityofatrialfibrillationablationusingamigosystemversusmanualapproachapilotstudy |