Cargando…

Further Effects of Phylogenetic Tree Style on Student Comprehension in an Introductory Biology Course

Phylogenetic trees have become increasingly important across the life sciences, and as a result, learning to interpret and reason from these diagrams is now an essential component of biology education. Unfortunately, students often struggle to understand phylogenetic trees. Style (i.e., diagonal or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dees, Jonathan, Bussard, Caitlin, Momsen, Jennifer L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-03-0058
_version_ 1783331224984485888
author Dees, Jonathan
Bussard, Caitlin
Momsen, Jennifer L.
author_facet Dees, Jonathan
Bussard, Caitlin
Momsen, Jennifer L.
author_sort Dees, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description Phylogenetic trees have become increasingly important across the life sciences, and as a result, learning to interpret and reason from these diagrams is now an essential component of biology education. Unfortunately, students often struggle to understand phylogenetic trees. Style (i.e., diagonal or bracket) is one factor that has been observed to impact how students interpret phylogenetic trees, and one goal of this research was to investigate these style effects across an introductory biology course. In addition, we investigated the impact of instruction that integrated diagonal and bracket phylogenetic trees equally. Before instruction, students were significantly more accurate with the bracket style for a variety of interpretation and construction tasks. After instruction, however, students were significantly more accurate only for construction tasks and interpretations involving taxa relatedness when using the bracket style. Thus, instruction that used both styles equally mitigated some, but not all, style effects. These results inform the development of research-based instruction that best supports student understanding of phylogenetic trees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5998317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59983172018-07-02 Further Effects of Phylogenetic Tree Style on Student Comprehension in an Introductory Biology Course Dees, Jonathan Bussard, Caitlin Momsen, Jennifer L. CBE Life Sci Educ Article Phylogenetic trees have become increasingly important across the life sciences, and as a result, learning to interpret and reason from these diagrams is now an essential component of biology education. Unfortunately, students often struggle to understand phylogenetic trees. Style (i.e., diagonal or bracket) is one factor that has been observed to impact how students interpret phylogenetic trees, and one goal of this research was to investigate these style effects across an introductory biology course. In addition, we investigated the impact of instruction that integrated diagonal and bracket phylogenetic trees equally. Before instruction, students were significantly more accurate with the bracket style for a variety of interpretation and construction tasks. After instruction, however, students were significantly more accurate only for construction tasks and interpretations involving taxa relatedness when using the bracket style. Thus, instruction that used both styles equally mitigated some, but not all, style effects. These results inform the development of research-based instruction that best supports student understanding of phylogenetic trees. American Society for Cell Biology 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5998317/ /pubmed/29749841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-03-0058 Text en © 2018 J. Dees et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2018 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Article
Dees, Jonathan
Bussard, Caitlin
Momsen, Jennifer L.
Further Effects of Phylogenetic Tree Style on Student Comprehension in an Introductory Biology Course
title Further Effects of Phylogenetic Tree Style on Student Comprehension in an Introductory Biology Course
title_full Further Effects of Phylogenetic Tree Style on Student Comprehension in an Introductory Biology Course
title_fullStr Further Effects of Phylogenetic Tree Style on Student Comprehension in an Introductory Biology Course
title_full_unstemmed Further Effects of Phylogenetic Tree Style on Student Comprehension in an Introductory Biology Course
title_short Further Effects of Phylogenetic Tree Style on Student Comprehension in an Introductory Biology Course
title_sort further effects of phylogenetic tree style on student comprehension in an introductory biology course
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-03-0058
work_keys_str_mv AT deesjonathan furthereffectsofphylogenetictreestyleonstudentcomprehensioninanintroductorybiologycourse
AT bussardcaitlin furthereffectsofphylogenetictreestyleonstudentcomprehensioninanintroductorybiologycourse
AT momsenjenniferl furthereffectsofphylogenetictreestyleonstudentcomprehensioninanintroductorybiologycourse