Cargando…

Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit

BACKGROUND: Motivational Interviewing (MI), Brief Advice (BA) and Health Education (HE) are established smoking cessation induction methods for smokers with low desire to quit. Although randomized controlled trials (RCT’s) have been frequently used to assess these interventions the temporal efficacy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bani-Yaghoub, Majid, Elhomani, Abdellatif, Catley, Delwyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0511-0
_version_ 1783331244300304384
author Bani-Yaghoub, Majid
Elhomani, Abdellatif
Catley, Delwyn
author_facet Bani-Yaghoub, Majid
Elhomani, Abdellatif
Catley, Delwyn
author_sort Bani-Yaghoub, Majid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Motivational Interviewing (MI), Brief Advice (BA) and Health Education (HE) are established smoking cessation induction methods for smokers with low desire to quit. Although randomized controlled trials (RCT’s) have been frequently used to assess these interventions the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions have been poorly elaborated. The present work endeavors to fill the gap by considering the full range of possible motivational outcomes for all of the participants. METHODS: As a two-step process, Markov Chain (MC) and Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) models were successively employed to examine the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions by computing the gradual movements of participants from an initial stage of unmotivated smoker to stages of increased motivation to quit and cessation. Specifically, in our re-analysis of data from the RCT we examined the proportion of participants in 4 stages of readiness to quit (unmotivated, undecided, motivated, former smokers) over 6 months, across treatment groups [MI (n = 87), BA (n = 43) and HE (n = 91)]. RESULTS: Although HE had greater efficacy compared to MI and BA (i.e., the highest smoking cessation rates), it had lower effectiveness at certain time points. This was due to the fact that HE had the greatest proportion of motivated smokers who quit smoking but simultaneously a large proportion of the motivated smokers became unmotivated to quit. The effectiveness of HE dropped substantially in weeks 3–12 and remained below the effectiveness of BA from week 12 onward. The 2-year ODE model projections show that the prevalence of motivated smokers in HE group may fall below 5%. The prevalence of HE former smokers can reach an equilibrium of 26%, where the prevalence of both BA and MI former smokers exceeds this equilibrium. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology proposed in this paper strongly benefits from the capabilities of both MC and ODE modeling approaches, in the event of low observations over the time. Particularly, the temporal population sizes are first estimated by the MC model. Then they are used to parametrize the ODE model and predict future values. The methodology enabes us to determine and compare the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions, yielding predictive and analytic insights related to temporal characteristics and capabilities of these interventions during the study period and beyond. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Testing Counseling Styles to Motivate Smokers to Quit, NCT01188018, (July 4, 2012). This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01188018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0511-0 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5998452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59984522018-06-25 Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit Bani-Yaghoub, Majid Elhomani, Abdellatif Catley, Delwyn BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Motivational Interviewing (MI), Brief Advice (BA) and Health Education (HE) are established smoking cessation induction methods for smokers with low desire to quit. Although randomized controlled trials (RCT’s) have been frequently used to assess these interventions the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions have been poorly elaborated. The present work endeavors to fill the gap by considering the full range of possible motivational outcomes for all of the participants. METHODS: As a two-step process, Markov Chain (MC) and Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) models were successively employed to examine the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions by computing the gradual movements of participants from an initial stage of unmotivated smoker to stages of increased motivation to quit and cessation. Specifically, in our re-analysis of data from the RCT we examined the proportion of participants in 4 stages of readiness to quit (unmotivated, undecided, motivated, former smokers) over 6 months, across treatment groups [MI (n = 87), BA (n = 43) and HE (n = 91)]. RESULTS: Although HE had greater efficacy compared to MI and BA (i.e., the highest smoking cessation rates), it had lower effectiveness at certain time points. This was due to the fact that HE had the greatest proportion of motivated smokers who quit smoking but simultaneously a large proportion of the motivated smokers became unmotivated to quit. The effectiveness of HE dropped substantially in weeks 3–12 and remained below the effectiveness of BA from week 12 onward. The 2-year ODE model projections show that the prevalence of motivated smokers in HE group may fall below 5%. The prevalence of HE former smokers can reach an equilibrium of 26%, where the prevalence of both BA and MI former smokers exceeds this equilibrium. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology proposed in this paper strongly benefits from the capabilities of both MC and ODE modeling approaches, in the event of low observations over the time. Particularly, the temporal population sizes are first estimated by the MC model. Then they are used to parametrize the ODE model and predict future values. The methodology enabes us to determine and compare the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions, yielding predictive and analytic insights related to temporal characteristics and capabilities of these interventions during the study period and beyond. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Testing Counseling Styles to Motivate Smokers to Quit, NCT01188018, (July 4, 2012). This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01188018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0511-0 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5998452/ /pubmed/29895280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0511-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bani-Yaghoub, Majid
Elhomani, Abdellatif
Catley, Delwyn
Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit
title Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit
title_full Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit
title_fullStr Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit
title_short Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit
title_sort effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0511-0
work_keys_str_mv AT baniyaghoubmajid effectivenessofmotivationalinterviewinghealtheducationandbriefadviceinapopulationofsmokerswhoarenotreadytoquit
AT elhomaniabdellatif effectivenessofmotivationalinterviewinghealtheducationandbriefadviceinapopulationofsmokerswhoarenotreadytoquit
AT catleydelwyn effectivenessofmotivationalinterviewinghealtheducationandbriefadviceinapopulationofsmokerswhoarenotreadytoquit