Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies

BACKGROUND: Teeth treated endodontically are more susceptible to vertical root fracture (VRF). Some studies have suggested that obturating the root canals with Gutta-percha or Resilon can reinforce endodontically treated teeth, but a few others have presented conflicting results. These inconsistent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Minmin, Chai, Zhaowu, Sun, Chengjun, Hu, Bo, Gao, Xiang, Chen, Yunjia, Song, Jinlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0571-x
_version_ 1783331254070935552
author Tan, Minmin
Chai, Zhaowu
Sun, Chengjun
Hu, Bo
Gao, Xiang
Chen, Yunjia
Song, Jinlin
author_facet Tan, Minmin
Chai, Zhaowu
Sun, Chengjun
Hu, Bo
Gao, Xiang
Chen, Yunjia
Song, Jinlin
author_sort Tan, Minmin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Teeth treated endodontically are more susceptible to vertical root fracture (VRF). Some studies have suggested that obturating the root canals with Gutta-percha or Resilon can reinforce endodontically treated teeth, but a few others have presented conflicting results. These inconsistent results cannot guide clinicians in determining clinical approaches. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate and compare the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated root canals obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the Resilon system. METHODS: Comprehensive literature searches were performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and Embase databases. The titles and abstracts of all of the retrieved articles were independently assessed by two authors according to predefined selection criteria. Data in the included articles were independently extracted. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcome indicators. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The Cochran Q test (I(2) test) was used to test for heterogeneity among studies. RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled in vitro trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the vertical root fracture resistance of unprepared and unfilled roots was significantly higher than that of roots obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus (SMD = − 0.69, 95% CI = − 1.34 to − 0.04, p = 0.04) or the Resilon system (SMD = − 0.54, 95% CI = − 1.07 to − 0.00, p = 0.05). The differences in fracture resistance between the roots filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the prepared unfilled root canals was not significant (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI = − 0.02 to 1.21, p = 0.06). Roots obturated with Resilon had higher fracture resistance than instrumented unfilled roots (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.44 to 1.22, p < 0.0001) or roots filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.01 to 1.23, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that filling with Gutta-percha/AH plus dose not reinforce endodontically treated roots, whereas obturating with the Resilon system can increase vertical root fracture resistance of prepared roots. As this meta-analysis was based on in vitro studies, it should be careful to extrapolate its conclusion to the clinical context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5998564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59985642018-06-25 Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies Tan, Minmin Chai, Zhaowu Sun, Chengjun Hu, Bo Gao, Xiang Chen, Yunjia Song, Jinlin BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Teeth treated endodontically are more susceptible to vertical root fracture (VRF). Some studies have suggested that obturating the root canals with Gutta-percha or Resilon can reinforce endodontically treated teeth, but a few others have presented conflicting results. These inconsistent results cannot guide clinicians in determining clinical approaches. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate and compare the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated root canals obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the Resilon system. METHODS: Comprehensive literature searches were performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and Embase databases. The titles and abstracts of all of the retrieved articles were independently assessed by two authors according to predefined selection criteria. Data in the included articles were independently extracted. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcome indicators. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The Cochran Q test (I(2) test) was used to test for heterogeneity among studies. RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled in vitro trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the vertical root fracture resistance of unprepared and unfilled roots was significantly higher than that of roots obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus (SMD = − 0.69, 95% CI = − 1.34 to − 0.04, p = 0.04) or the Resilon system (SMD = − 0.54, 95% CI = − 1.07 to − 0.00, p = 0.05). The differences in fracture resistance between the roots filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the prepared unfilled root canals was not significant (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI = − 0.02 to 1.21, p = 0.06). Roots obturated with Resilon had higher fracture resistance than instrumented unfilled roots (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.44 to 1.22, p < 0.0001) or roots filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.01 to 1.23, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that filling with Gutta-percha/AH plus dose not reinforce endodontically treated roots, whereas obturating with the Resilon system can increase vertical root fracture resistance of prepared roots. As this meta-analysis was based on in vitro studies, it should be careful to extrapolate its conclusion to the clinical context. BioMed Central 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5998564/ /pubmed/29895270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0571-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tan, Minmin
Chai, Zhaowu
Sun, Chengjun
Hu, Bo
Gao, Xiang
Chen, Yunjia
Song, Jinlin
Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
title Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
title_full Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
title_short Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
title_sort comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with gutta-percha and resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0571-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tanminmin comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies
AT chaizhaowu comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies
AT sunchengjun comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies
AT hubo comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies
AT gaoxiang comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies
AT chenyunjia comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies
AT songjinlin comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies