Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
BACKGROUND: Teeth treated endodontically are more susceptible to vertical root fracture (VRF). Some studies have suggested that obturating the root canals with Gutta-percha or Resilon can reinforce endodontically treated teeth, but a few others have presented conflicting results. These inconsistent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0571-x |
_version_ | 1783331254070935552 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Minmin Chai, Zhaowu Sun, Chengjun Hu, Bo Gao, Xiang Chen, Yunjia Song, Jinlin |
author_facet | Tan, Minmin Chai, Zhaowu Sun, Chengjun Hu, Bo Gao, Xiang Chen, Yunjia Song, Jinlin |
author_sort | Tan, Minmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Teeth treated endodontically are more susceptible to vertical root fracture (VRF). Some studies have suggested that obturating the root canals with Gutta-percha or Resilon can reinforce endodontically treated teeth, but a few others have presented conflicting results. These inconsistent results cannot guide clinicians in determining clinical approaches. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate and compare the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated root canals obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the Resilon system. METHODS: Comprehensive literature searches were performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and Embase databases. The titles and abstracts of all of the retrieved articles were independently assessed by two authors according to predefined selection criteria. Data in the included articles were independently extracted. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcome indicators. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The Cochran Q test (I(2) test) was used to test for heterogeneity among studies. RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled in vitro trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the vertical root fracture resistance of unprepared and unfilled roots was significantly higher than that of roots obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus (SMD = − 0.69, 95% CI = − 1.34 to − 0.04, p = 0.04) or the Resilon system (SMD = − 0.54, 95% CI = − 1.07 to − 0.00, p = 0.05). The differences in fracture resistance between the roots filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the prepared unfilled root canals was not significant (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI = − 0.02 to 1.21, p = 0.06). Roots obturated with Resilon had higher fracture resistance than instrumented unfilled roots (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.44 to 1.22, p < 0.0001) or roots filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.01 to 1.23, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that filling with Gutta-percha/AH plus dose not reinforce endodontically treated roots, whereas obturating with the Resilon system can increase vertical root fracture resistance of prepared roots. As this meta-analysis was based on in vitro studies, it should be careful to extrapolate its conclusion to the clinical context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5998564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59985642018-06-25 Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies Tan, Minmin Chai, Zhaowu Sun, Chengjun Hu, Bo Gao, Xiang Chen, Yunjia Song, Jinlin BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Teeth treated endodontically are more susceptible to vertical root fracture (VRF). Some studies have suggested that obturating the root canals with Gutta-percha or Resilon can reinforce endodontically treated teeth, but a few others have presented conflicting results. These inconsistent results cannot guide clinicians in determining clinical approaches. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate and compare the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated root canals obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the Resilon system. METHODS: Comprehensive literature searches were performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and Embase databases. The titles and abstracts of all of the retrieved articles were independently assessed by two authors according to predefined selection criteria. Data in the included articles were independently extracted. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcome indicators. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The Cochran Q test (I(2) test) was used to test for heterogeneity among studies. RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled in vitro trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the vertical root fracture resistance of unprepared and unfilled roots was significantly higher than that of roots obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus (SMD = − 0.69, 95% CI = − 1.34 to − 0.04, p = 0.04) or the Resilon system (SMD = − 0.54, 95% CI = − 1.07 to − 0.00, p = 0.05). The differences in fracture resistance between the roots filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the prepared unfilled root canals was not significant (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI = − 0.02 to 1.21, p = 0.06). Roots obturated with Resilon had higher fracture resistance than instrumented unfilled roots (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.44 to 1.22, p < 0.0001) or roots filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.01 to 1.23, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that filling with Gutta-percha/AH plus dose not reinforce endodontically treated roots, whereas obturating with the Resilon system can increase vertical root fracture resistance of prepared roots. As this meta-analysis was based on in vitro studies, it should be careful to extrapolate its conclusion to the clinical context. BioMed Central 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5998564/ /pubmed/29895270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0571-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tan, Minmin Chai, Zhaowu Sun, Chengjun Hu, Bo Gao, Xiang Chen, Yunjia Song, Jinlin Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies |
title | Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with gutta-percha and resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0571-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanminmin comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT chaizhaowu comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT sunchengjun comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT hubo comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT gaoxiang comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT chenyunjia comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT songjinlin comparativeevaluationoftheverticalfractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithguttaperchaandresilonametaanalysisofinvitrostudies |