Cargando…

Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration

BACKGROUND: Single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) is a powerful technique for studying in vivo neurochemistry, but has an often-overlooked source of error variance: inconsistent voxel placement between scans. We developed and evaluated an Automated Voxel Placement (AVP) proc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodcock, Eric A., Arshad, Muzamil, Khatib, Dalal, Stanley, Jeffrey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29911203
http://dx.doi.org/10.17756/jnpn.2018-020
_version_ 1783331276232589312
author Woodcock, Eric A.
Arshad, Muzamil
Khatib, Dalal
Stanley, Jeffrey A.
author_facet Woodcock, Eric A.
Arshad, Muzamil
Khatib, Dalal
Stanley, Jeffrey A.
author_sort Woodcock, Eric A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) is a powerful technique for studying in vivo neurochemistry, but has an often-overlooked source of error variance: inconsistent voxel placement between scans. We developed and evaluated an Automated Voxel Placement (AVP) procedure for accurate and reliable (1)H MRS voxel prescription. AVP is a suite of Linux-based programs that facilitate automated template-driven single-voxel coregistration. METHODS: Three studies were conducted to evaluate AVP for prescription of one voxel: left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. First, we evaluated how robust AVP was to ‘extreme’ subject head positions/angulations within the scanner head coil. Second, subjects (N = 13) were recruited and underwent MR scans. Manual voxel prescription (n = 5) was contrasted with AVP (n = 8). A subset of AVP subjects (n = 4) completed a second scan. Third, ongoing data collection (n = 16; recruited for a separate study) helped evaluate AVP. Voxel placement accuracy was quantified as 3D geometric voxel overlap percentage between each subject’s voxel and the template voxel. Reliability was quantified as 3D geometric voxel overlap percentage across subjects at each time point and within subjects who completed two scans. RESULTS: Results demonstrated that AVP was robust to ‘extreme’ head positions (97.5% - 97.9% overlap with the template voxel). AVP was significantly more accurate (baseline and follow-up: 96.2% ± 3.0% and 97.6% ± 1.4% overlap) than manual voxel placement (67.7% ± 22.8% overlap; ps<.05). AVP was reliable within- (97.9%) and between-subjects (94.2% and 97.2% overlap; baseline and follow-up; respectively). Finally, ongoing data collection indicates AVP is accurate (96.0%). CONCLUSION: These pilot studies demonstrated that AVP was feasible, accurate, and reliable method for automated single voxel coregistration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5998677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59986772018-06-13 Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration Woodcock, Eric A. Arshad, Muzamil Khatib, Dalal Stanley, Jeffrey A. J Neuroimaging Psychiatry Neurol Article BACKGROUND: Single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) is a powerful technique for studying in vivo neurochemistry, but has an often-overlooked source of error variance: inconsistent voxel placement between scans. We developed and evaluated an Automated Voxel Placement (AVP) procedure for accurate and reliable (1)H MRS voxel prescription. AVP is a suite of Linux-based programs that facilitate automated template-driven single-voxel coregistration. METHODS: Three studies were conducted to evaluate AVP for prescription of one voxel: left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. First, we evaluated how robust AVP was to ‘extreme’ subject head positions/angulations within the scanner head coil. Second, subjects (N = 13) were recruited and underwent MR scans. Manual voxel prescription (n = 5) was contrasted with AVP (n = 8). A subset of AVP subjects (n = 4) completed a second scan. Third, ongoing data collection (n = 16; recruited for a separate study) helped evaluate AVP. Voxel placement accuracy was quantified as 3D geometric voxel overlap percentage between each subject’s voxel and the template voxel. Reliability was quantified as 3D geometric voxel overlap percentage across subjects at each time point and within subjects who completed two scans. RESULTS: Results demonstrated that AVP was robust to ‘extreme’ head positions (97.5% - 97.9% overlap with the template voxel). AVP was significantly more accurate (baseline and follow-up: 96.2% ± 3.0% and 97.6% ± 1.4% overlap) than manual voxel placement (67.7% ± 22.8% overlap; ps<.05). AVP was reliable within- (97.9%) and between-subjects (94.2% and 97.2% overlap; baseline and follow-up; respectively). Finally, ongoing data collection indicates AVP is accurate (96.0%). CONCLUSION: These pilot studies demonstrated that AVP was feasible, accurate, and reliable method for automated single voxel coregistration. 2018-02-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5998677/ /pubmed/29911203 http://dx.doi.org/10.17756/jnpn.2018-020 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits commercial use, including reproduction, adaptation, and distribution of the article provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Woodcock, Eric A.
Arshad, Muzamil
Khatib, Dalal
Stanley, Jeffrey A.
Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration
title Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration
title_full Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration
title_fullStr Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration
title_full_unstemmed Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration
title_short Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration
title_sort automated voxel placement: a linux-based suite of tools for accurate and reliable single voxel coregistration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29911203
http://dx.doi.org/10.17756/jnpn.2018-020
work_keys_str_mv AT woodcockerica automatedvoxelplacementalinuxbasedsuiteoftoolsforaccurateandreliablesinglevoxelcoregistration
AT arshadmuzamil automatedvoxelplacementalinuxbasedsuiteoftoolsforaccurateandreliablesinglevoxelcoregistration
AT khatibdalal automatedvoxelplacementalinuxbasedsuiteoftoolsforaccurateandreliablesinglevoxelcoregistration
AT stanleyjeffreya automatedvoxelplacementalinuxbasedsuiteoftoolsforaccurateandreliablesinglevoxelcoregistration