Cargando…

Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction

BACKGROUND: Deep Neural Networks (DNN), in particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), has recently achieved state-of-art results for the task of Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) extraction. Most CNN architectures incorporate a pooling layer to reduce the dimensionality of the convolution layer outp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor, Segura-Bedmar, Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2195-1
_version_ 1783331294163238912
author Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor
Segura-Bedmar, Isabel
author_facet Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor
Segura-Bedmar, Isabel
author_sort Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep Neural Networks (DNN), in particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), has recently achieved state-of-art results for the task of Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) extraction. Most CNN architectures incorporate a pooling layer to reduce the dimensionality of the convolution layer output, preserving relevant features and removing irrelevant details. All the previous CNN based systems for DDI extraction used max-pooling layers. RESULTS: In this paper, we evaluate the performance of various pooling methods (in particular max-pooling, average-pooling and attentive pooling), as well as their combination, for the task of DDI extraction. Our experiments show that max-pooling exhibits a higher performance in F1-score (64.56%) than attentive pooling (59.92%) and than average-pooling (58.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Max-pooling outperforms the others alternatives because is the only one which is invariant to the special pad tokens that are appending to the shorter sentences known as padding. Actually, the combination of max-pooling and attentive pooling does not improve the performance as compared with the single max-pooling technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5998766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59987662018-06-25 Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor Segura-Bedmar, Isabel BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Deep Neural Networks (DNN), in particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), has recently achieved state-of-art results for the task of Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) extraction. Most CNN architectures incorporate a pooling layer to reduce the dimensionality of the convolution layer output, preserving relevant features and removing irrelevant details. All the previous CNN based systems for DDI extraction used max-pooling layers. RESULTS: In this paper, we evaluate the performance of various pooling methods (in particular max-pooling, average-pooling and attentive pooling), as well as their combination, for the task of DDI extraction. Our experiments show that max-pooling exhibits a higher performance in F1-score (64.56%) than attentive pooling (59.92%) and than average-pooling (58.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Max-pooling outperforms the others alternatives because is the only one which is invariant to the special pad tokens that are appending to the shorter sentences known as padding. Actually, the combination of max-pooling and attentive pooling does not improve the performance as compared with the single max-pooling technique. BioMed Central 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5998766/ /pubmed/29897318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2195-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor
Segura-Bedmar, Isabel
Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
title Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
title_full Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
title_fullStr Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
title_short Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
title_sort evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2195-1
work_keys_str_mv AT suarezpaniaguavictor evaluationofpoolingoperationsinconvolutionalarchitecturesfordrugdruginteractionextraction
AT segurabedmarisabel evaluationofpoolingoperationsinconvolutionalarchitecturesfordrugdruginteractionextraction