Cargando…
Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
BACKGROUND: Deep Neural Networks (DNN), in particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), has recently achieved state-of-art results for the task of Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) extraction. Most CNN architectures incorporate a pooling layer to reduce the dimensionality of the convolution layer outp...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2195-1 |
_version_ | 1783331294163238912 |
---|---|
author | Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor Segura-Bedmar, Isabel |
author_facet | Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor Segura-Bedmar, Isabel |
author_sort | Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep Neural Networks (DNN), in particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), has recently achieved state-of-art results for the task of Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) extraction. Most CNN architectures incorporate a pooling layer to reduce the dimensionality of the convolution layer output, preserving relevant features and removing irrelevant details. All the previous CNN based systems for DDI extraction used max-pooling layers. RESULTS: In this paper, we evaluate the performance of various pooling methods (in particular max-pooling, average-pooling and attentive pooling), as well as their combination, for the task of DDI extraction. Our experiments show that max-pooling exhibits a higher performance in F1-score (64.56%) than attentive pooling (59.92%) and than average-pooling (58.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Max-pooling outperforms the others alternatives because is the only one which is invariant to the special pad tokens that are appending to the shorter sentences known as padding. Actually, the combination of max-pooling and attentive pooling does not improve the performance as compared with the single max-pooling technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5998766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59987662018-06-25 Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor Segura-Bedmar, Isabel BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Deep Neural Networks (DNN), in particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), has recently achieved state-of-art results for the task of Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) extraction. Most CNN architectures incorporate a pooling layer to reduce the dimensionality of the convolution layer output, preserving relevant features and removing irrelevant details. All the previous CNN based systems for DDI extraction used max-pooling layers. RESULTS: In this paper, we evaluate the performance of various pooling methods (in particular max-pooling, average-pooling and attentive pooling), as well as their combination, for the task of DDI extraction. Our experiments show that max-pooling exhibits a higher performance in F1-score (64.56%) than attentive pooling (59.92%) and than average-pooling (58.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Max-pooling outperforms the others alternatives because is the only one which is invariant to the special pad tokens that are appending to the shorter sentences known as padding. Actually, the combination of max-pooling and attentive pooling does not improve the performance as compared with the single max-pooling technique. BioMed Central 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5998766/ /pubmed/29897318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2195-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Suárez-Paniagua, Víctor Segura-Bedmar, Isabel Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction |
title | Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction |
title_full | Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction |
title_short | Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction |
title_sort | evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2195-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suarezpaniaguavictor evaluationofpoolingoperationsinconvolutionalarchitecturesfordrugdruginteractionextraction AT segurabedmarisabel evaluationofpoolingoperationsinconvolutionalarchitecturesfordrugdruginteractionextraction |