Cargando…

Virtual research visits and direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Parkinson’s disease

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a proof-of-concept study to evaluate remote recruitment and assessment of individuals (“virtual research visits”) with Parkinson's disease who have pursued direct-to-consumer genetic testing. METHODS: Participants in 23andMe’s “Parkinson’s Res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorsey, E Ray, Darwin, Kristin C, Mohammed, Samara, Donohue, Sean, Tethal, Alyssa, Achey, Meredith A, Ward, Susan, Caughey, Elaine, Conley, Emily D, Eriksson, Nicholas, Ravina, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207615592998
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a proof-of-concept study to evaluate remote recruitment and assessment of individuals (“virtual research visits”) with Parkinson's disease who have pursued direct-to-consumer genetic testing. METHODS: Participants in 23andMe’s “Parkinson’s Research Community” were contacted by 23andMe. Fifty willing participants living in 23 states underwent a remote, standardized assessment including cognitive and motor tests by a neurologist via video conferencing and then completed a survey. Primary outcomes assessed were (a) proportion of participants who completed the remote assessments; (b) level of agreement (using Cohen’s kappa coefficient) of patient-reported data with that of a neurologist; and (c) interest in future virtual research visits. RESULTS: The self-reported diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease was confirmed in all cases (k = 1.00). The level of agreement for age of symptom onset (k = 0.97) and family history (k = 0.85) was very good but worse for falling (k = 0.59), tremor (k = 0.56), light-headedness (k = 0.31), and urine control (k = 0.15). Thirty-eight (76%) of the 50 participants completed a post-assessment survey, and 87% of respondents said they would be more or much more willing to participate in future clinical trials if they could do research visits remotely. CONCLUSION: Remote clinical assessments of individuals with known genotypes were conducted nationally and rapidly from a single site, confirmed self-reported diagnosis, and were received favorably. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and virtual research visits together may enable characterization of genotype and phenotype for geographically diverse populations.