Cargando…
Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula/PF is the most frequent and feared complication after distal pancreatectomy/DP. However, the safest technique of pancreatic stump closure remains an ongoing debate. Here, we aimed to compare the safety of different pancreatic stump closure techniques for preventing PF...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197553 |
_version_ | 1783331347166658560 |
---|---|
author | Tieftrunk, Elke Demir, Ihsan Ekin Schorn, Stephan Sargut, Mine Scheufele, Florian Calavrezos, Lenika Schirren, Rebekka Friess, Helmut Ceyhan, Güralp O. |
author_facet | Tieftrunk, Elke Demir, Ihsan Ekin Schorn, Stephan Sargut, Mine Scheufele, Florian Calavrezos, Lenika Schirren, Rebekka Friess, Helmut Ceyhan, Güralp O. |
author_sort | Tieftrunk, Elke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula/PF is the most frequent and feared complication after distal pancreatectomy/DP. However, the safest technique of pancreatic stump closure remains an ongoing debate. Here, we aimed to compare the safety of different pancreatic stump closure techniques for preventing PF during DP. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA-based meta-analysis of all relevant studies that compared at least two techniques of stump closure during DP with regard to PF rates/PFR. We further performed a retrospective analysis of our institutional PFR in correlation with stump closure techniques. RESULTS: 8301 studies were initially identified. From these, ten randomized controlled trials/RCTs, eleven prospective and 59 retrospective studies were eligible. Stapler closure (26%vs.31%, OR:0.73, p = 0.02), combination of stapler and suture (30%vs.33%, OR:0.70, p = 0.05), or stump anastomosis (14%vs.28%, OR:0.51, p = 0.02) were associated with lower PFR than suture closure alone. Spleen preservation/splenectomy, or laparoscopic/open DP, TachoSil(®), fibrin-like glue-application, or bioabsorbable-stapler-reinforcements (Seamguard(®)) did not influence PFR after DP. In contrast, autologous patches (falciform ligament/seromuscular patches) resulted in lower PFR than no patch application (21.9%vs.25,8%, OR:0.60, p = 0.006). In our institution, the major three techniques of stump closure resulted in comparable PFR (suture:27%, stapler:29%, or combination:24%). However, selective suturing/clipping of the main pancreatic duct during pancreatic stump closure prevented severe PF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: After DP, stapler closure, pancreatic anastomosis, or falciform/seromuscular patches lead to lower PFR than suture closure alone. However, the differences are rather small, and further RCTs are needed to test these effects. Selective closure of the main pancreatic duct during stump closure may prevent severe PF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5999073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59990732018-06-21 Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience Tieftrunk, Elke Demir, Ihsan Ekin Schorn, Stephan Sargut, Mine Scheufele, Florian Calavrezos, Lenika Schirren, Rebekka Friess, Helmut Ceyhan, Güralp O. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula/PF is the most frequent and feared complication after distal pancreatectomy/DP. However, the safest technique of pancreatic stump closure remains an ongoing debate. Here, we aimed to compare the safety of different pancreatic stump closure techniques for preventing PF during DP. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA-based meta-analysis of all relevant studies that compared at least two techniques of stump closure during DP with regard to PF rates/PFR. We further performed a retrospective analysis of our institutional PFR in correlation with stump closure techniques. RESULTS: 8301 studies were initially identified. From these, ten randomized controlled trials/RCTs, eleven prospective and 59 retrospective studies were eligible. Stapler closure (26%vs.31%, OR:0.73, p = 0.02), combination of stapler and suture (30%vs.33%, OR:0.70, p = 0.05), or stump anastomosis (14%vs.28%, OR:0.51, p = 0.02) were associated with lower PFR than suture closure alone. Spleen preservation/splenectomy, or laparoscopic/open DP, TachoSil(®), fibrin-like glue-application, or bioabsorbable-stapler-reinforcements (Seamguard(®)) did not influence PFR after DP. In contrast, autologous patches (falciform ligament/seromuscular patches) resulted in lower PFR than no patch application (21.9%vs.25,8%, OR:0.60, p = 0.006). In our institution, the major three techniques of stump closure resulted in comparable PFR (suture:27%, stapler:29%, or combination:24%). However, selective suturing/clipping of the main pancreatic duct during pancreatic stump closure prevented severe PF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: After DP, stapler closure, pancreatic anastomosis, or falciform/seromuscular patches lead to lower PFR than suture closure alone. However, the differences are rather small, and further RCTs are needed to test these effects. Selective closure of the main pancreatic duct during stump closure may prevent severe PF. Public Library of Science 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5999073/ /pubmed/29897920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197553 Text en © 2018 Tieftrunk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tieftrunk, Elke Demir, Ihsan Ekin Schorn, Stephan Sargut, Mine Scheufele, Florian Calavrezos, Lenika Schirren, Rebekka Friess, Helmut Ceyhan, Güralp O. Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience |
title | Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience |
title_full | Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience |
title_fullStr | Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience |
title_short | Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience |
title_sort | pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: meta-analysis and single-center experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197553 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tieftrunkelke pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience AT demirihsanekin pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience AT schornstephan pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience AT sargutmine pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience AT scheufeleflorian pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience AT calavrezoslenika pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience AT schirrenrebekka pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience AT friesshelmut pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience AT ceyhanguralpo pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience |