Cargando…

Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula/PF is the most frequent and feared complication after distal pancreatectomy/DP. However, the safest technique of pancreatic stump closure remains an ongoing debate. Here, we aimed to compare the safety of different pancreatic stump closure techniques for preventing PF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tieftrunk, Elke, Demir, Ihsan Ekin, Schorn, Stephan, Sargut, Mine, Scheufele, Florian, Calavrezos, Lenika, Schirren, Rebekka, Friess, Helmut, Ceyhan, Güralp O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197553
_version_ 1783331347166658560
author Tieftrunk, Elke
Demir, Ihsan Ekin
Schorn, Stephan
Sargut, Mine
Scheufele, Florian
Calavrezos, Lenika
Schirren, Rebekka
Friess, Helmut
Ceyhan, Güralp O.
author_facet Tieftrunk, Elke
Demir, Ihsan Ekin
Schorn, Stephan
Sargut, Mine
Scheufele, Florian
Calavrezos, Lenika
Schirren, Rebekka
Friess, Helmut
Ceyhan, Güralp O.
author_sort Tieftrunk, Elke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula/PF is the most frequent and feared complication after distal pancreatectomy/DP. However, the safest technique of pancreatic stump closure remains an ongoing debate. Here, we aimed to compare the safety of different pancreatic stump closure techniques for preventing PF during DP. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA-based meta-analysis of all relevant studies that compared at least two techniques of stump closure during DP with regard to PF rates/PFR. We further performed a retrospective analysis of our institutional PFR in correlation with stump closure techniques. RESULTS: 8301 studies were initially identified. From these, ten randomized controlled trials/RCTs, eleven prospective and 59 retrospective studies were eligible. Stapler closure (26%vs.31%, OR:0.73, p = 0.02), combination of stapler and suture (30%vs.33%, OR:0.70, p = 0.05), or stump anastomosis (14%vs.28%, OR:0.51, p = 0.02) were associated with lower PFR than suture closure alone. Spleen preservation/splenectomy, or laparoscopic/open DP, TachoSil(®), fibrin-like glue-application, or bioabsorbable-stapler-reinforcements (Seamguard(®)) did not influence PFR after DP. In contrast, autologous patches (falciform ligament/seromuscular patches) resulted in lower PFR than no patch application (21.9%vs.25,8%, OR:0.60, p = 0.006). In our institution, the major three techniques of stump closure resulted in comparable PFR (suture:27%, stapler:29%, or combination:24%). However, selective suturing/clipping of the main pancreatic duct during pancreatic stump closure prevented severe PF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: After DP, stapler closure, pancreatic anastomosis, or falciform/seromuscular patches lead to lower PFR than suture closure alone. However, the differences are rather small, and further RCTs are needed to test these effects. Selective closure of the main pancreatic duct during stump closure may prevent severe PF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59990732018-06-21 Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience Tieftrunk, Elke Demir, Ihsan Ekin Schorn, Stephan Sargut, Mine Scheufele, Florian Calavrezos, Lenika Schirren, Rebekka Friess, Helmut Ceyhan, Güralp O. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula/PF is the most frequent and feared complication after distal pancreatectomy/DP. However, the safest technique of pancreatic stump closure remains an ongoing debate. Here, we aimed to compare the safety of different pancreatic stump closure techniques for preventing PF during DP. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA-based meta-analysis of all relevant studies that compared at least two techniques of stump closure during DP with regard to PF rates/PFR. We further performed a retrospective analysis of our institutional PFR in correlation with stump closure techniques. RESULTS: 8301 studies were initially identified. From these, ten randomized controlled trials/RCTs, eleven prospective and 59 retrospective studies were eligible. Stapler closure (26%vs.31%, OR:0.73, p = 0.02), combination of stapler and suture (30%vs.33%, OR:0.70, p = 0.05), or stump anastomosis (14%vs.28%, OR:0.51, p = 0.02) were associated with lower PFR than suture closure alone. Spleen preservation/splenectomy, or laparoscopic/open DP, TachoSil(®), fibrin-like glue-application, or bioabsorbable-stapler-reinforcements (Seamguard(®)) did not influence PFR after DP. In contrast, autologous patches (falciform ligament/seromuscular patches) resulted in lower PFR than no patch application (21.9%vs.25,8%, OR:0.60, p = 0.006). In our institution, the major three techniques of stump closure resulted in comparable PFR (suture:27%, stapler:29%, or combination:24%). However, selective suturing/clipping of the main pancreatic duct during pancreatic stump closure prevented severe PF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: After DP, stapler closure, pancreatic anastomosis, or falciform/seromuscular patches lead to lower PFR than suture closure alone. However, the differences are rather small, and further RCTs are needed to test these effects. Selective closure of the main pancreatic duct during stump closure may prevent severe PF. Public Library of Science 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5999073/ /pubmed/29897920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197553 Text en © 2018 Tieftrunk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tieftrunk, Elke
Demir, Ihsan Ekin
Schorn, Stephan
Sargut, Mine
Scheufele, Florian
Calavrezos, Lenika
Schirren, Rebekka
Friess, Helmut
Ceyhan, Güralp O.
Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience
title Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience
title_full Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience
title_fullStr Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience
title_short Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience
title_sort pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: meta-analysis and single-center experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197553
work_keys_str_mv AT tieftrunkelke pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience
AT demirihsanekin pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience
AT schornstephan pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience
AT sargutmine pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience
AT scheufeleflorian pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience
AT calavrezoslenika pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience
AT schirrenrebekka pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience
AT friesshelmut pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience
AT ceyhanguralpo pancreaticstumpclosuretechniquesandpancreaticfistulaformationafterdistalpancreatectomymetaanalysisandsinglecenterexperience