Cargando…
The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Decisions regarding which vaccines are funded in the United Kingdom (UK) are increasingly informed by cost-effectiveness analyses. Such analyses use Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) as a measure of effectiveness and assume that QALYs are equal regardless of where and in whom they occu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197374 |
_version_ | 1783331354615742464 |
---|---|
author | Lasseter, Gemma Al-Janabi, Hareth Trotter, Caroline L. Carroll, Fran E. Christensen, Hannah |
author_facet | Lasseter, Gemma Al-Janabi, Hareth Trotter, Caroline L. Carroll, Fran E. Christensen, Hannah |
author_sort | Lasseter, Gemma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Decisions regarding which vaccines are funded in the United Kingdom (UK) are increasingly informed by cost-effectiveness analyses. Such analyses use Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) as a measure of effectiveness and assume that QALYs are equal regardless of where and in whom they occur in the population. However, there is increasing debate about whether this QALY approach is appropriate and whether societal preferences for childhood vaccinations should be used to help inform childhood immunisation policy. OBJECTIVE: To gauge the general public’s preferences for prioritising certain characteristics of childhood vaccination, to help inform future policy making decisions in the UK. DESIGN: Qualitative design using individual face-to-face interviews, with data analysed using an inductive thematic framework approach. SETTING: Two counties in England, UK. POPULATION: Adult members of the general public were recruited using the Bristol and South Gloucestershire open electoral registers, using gender and deprivation quotas for each area. PARTICIPANTS: 21 members of the public participated in qualitative interviews. RESULTS: The qualitative research identified three major themes and several key attributes that influences participant’s opinions about priority setting for childhood vaccinations: (1) population segment (i.e. age group, carer impact and social group), (2) vaccine preventable diseases preferences (i.e. disease severity, disease incidence and declining infection) and (3) risks and benefits associated with childhood vaccinations (i.e. vaccine associated side-effects, herd protection and peace of mind). CONCLUSION: Evidence from this qualitative study suggests that some members of the UK general public have more nuanced views than the health-maximisation approach when considering how childhood vaccines should be prioritised. This is not necessarily captured by the current economic approaches for assessing the benefits from childhood vaccinations in the UK, but is an important area for future research to ensure appropriate decision making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5999095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59990952018-06-21 The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study Lasseter, Gemma Al-Janabi, Hareth Trotter, Caroline L. Carroll, Fran E. Christensen, Hannah PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Decisions regarding which vaccines are funded in the United Kingdom (UK) are increasingly informed by cost-effectiveness analyses. Such analyses use Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) as a measure of effectiveness and assume that QALYs are equal regardless of where and in whom they occur in the population. However, there is increasing debate about whether this QALY approach is appropriate and whether societal preferences for childhood vaccinations should be used to help inform childhood immunisation policy. OBJECTIVE: To gauge the general public’s preferences for prioritising certain characteristics of childhood vaccination, to help inform future policy making decisions in the UK. DESIGN: Qualitative design using individual face-to-face interviews, with data analysed using an inductive thematic framework approach. SETTING: Two counties in England, UK. POPULATION: Adult members of the general public were recruited using the Bristol and South Gloucestershire open electoral registers, using gender and deprivation quotas for each area. PARTICIPANTS: 21 members of the public participated in qualitative interviews. RESULTS: The qualitative research identified three major themes and several key attributes that influences participant’s opinions about priority setting for childhood vaccinations: (1) population segment (i.e. age group, carer impact and social group), (2) vaccine preventable diseases preferences (i.e. disease severity, disease incidence and declining infection) and (3) risks and benefits associated with childhood vaccinations (i.e. vaccine associated side-effects, herd protection and peace of mind). CONCLUSION: Evidence from this qualitative study suggests that some members of the UK general public have more nuanced views than the health-maximisation approach when considering how childhood vaccines should be prioritised. This is not necessarily captured by the current economic approaches for assessing the benefits from childhood vaccinations in the UK, but is an important area for future research to ensure appropriate decision making. Public Library of Science 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5999095/ /pubmed/29897894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197374 Text en © 2018 Lasseter et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lasseter, Gemma Al-Janabi, Hareth Trotter, Caroline L. Carroll, Fran E. Christensen, Hannah The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study |
title | The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study |
title_full | The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study |
title_short | The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study |
title_sort | views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lassetergemma theviewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT aljanabihareth theviewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT trottercarolinel theviewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT carrollfrane theviewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT christensenhannah theviewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT lassetergemma viewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT aljanabihareth viewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT trottercarolinel viewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT carrollfrane viewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy AT christensenhannah viewsofthegeneralpubliconprioritisingvaccinationprogrammesagainstchildhooddiseasesaqualitativestudy |