Cargando…
Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives
Integrated landscape initiatives typically aim to strengthen landscape governance by developing and facilitating multi-stakeholder platforms. These are institutional coordination mechanisms that enable discussions, negotiations, and joint planning between stakeholders from various sectors in a given...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0847-y |
_version_ | 1783331365415026688 |
---|---|
author | Kusters, Koen Buck, Louise de Graaf, Maartje Minang, Peter van Oosten, Cora Zagt, Roderick |
author_facet | Kusters, Koen Buck, Louise de Graaf, Maartje Minang, Peter van Oosten, Cora Zagt, Roderick |
author_sort | Kusters, Koen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Integrated landscape initiatives typically aim to strengthen landscape governance by developing and facilitating multi-stakeholder platforms. These are institutional coordination mechanisms that enable discussions, negotiations, and joint planning between stakeholders from various sectors in a given landscape. Multi-stakeholder platforms tend to involve complex processes with diverse actors, whose objectives and focus may be subjected to periodic re-evaluation, revision or reform. In this article we propose a participatory method to aid planning, monitoring, and evaluation of such platforms, and we report on experiences from piloting the method in Ghana and Indonesia. The method is comprised of three components. The first can be used to look ahead, identifying priorities for future multi-stakeholder collaboration in the landscape. It is based on the identification of four aspirations that are common across multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. The second can be used to look inward. It focuses on the processes within an existing multi-stakeholder platform in order to identify areas for possible improvement. The third can be used to look back, identifying the main outcomes of an existing platform and comparing them to the original objectives. The three components can be implemented together or separately. They can be used to inform planning and adaptive management of the platform, as well as to demonstrate performance and inform the design of new interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5999122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59991222018-06-28 Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives Kusters, Koen Buck, Louise de Graaf, Maartje Minang, Peter van Oosten, Cora Zagt, Roderick Environ Manage Article Integrated landscape initiatives typically aim to strengthen landscape governance by developing and facilitating multi-stakeholder platforms. These are institutional coordination mechanisms that enable discussions, negotiations, and joint planning between stakeholders from various sectors in a given landscape. Multi-stakeholder platforms tend to involve complex processes with diverse actors, whose objectives and focus may be subjected to periodic re-evaluation, revision or reform. In this article we propose a participatory method to aid planning, monitoring, and evaluation of such platforms, and we report on experiences from piloting the method in Ghana and Indonesia. The method is comprised of three components. The first can be used to look ahead, identifying priorities for future multi-stakeholder collaboration in the landscape. It is based on the identification of four aspirations that are common across multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. The second can be used to look inward. It focuses on the processes within an existing multi-stakeholder platform in order to identify areas for possible improvement. The third can be used to look back, identifying the main outcomes of an existing platform and comparing them to the original objectives. The three components can be implemented together or separately. They can be used to inform planning and adaptive management of the platform, as well as to demonstrate performance and inform the design of new interventions. Springer US 2017-03-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5999122/ /pubmed/28324144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0847-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Kusters, Koen Buck, Louise de Graaf, Maartje Minang, Peter van Oosten, Cora Zagt, Roderick Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
title | Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
title_full | Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
title_fullStr | Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
title_full_unstemmed | Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
title_short | Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
title_sort | participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation of multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0847-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kusterskoen participatoryplanningmonitoringandevaluationofmultistakeholderplatformsinintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT bucklouise participatoryplanningmonitoringandevaluationofmultistakeholderplatformsinintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT degraafmaartje participatoryplanningmonitoringandevaluationofmultistakeholderplatformsinintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT minangpeter participatoryplanningmonitoringandevaluationofmultistakeholderplatformsinintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT vanoostencora participatoryplanningmonitoringandevaluationofmultistakeholderplatformsinintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT zagtroderick participatoryplanningmonitoringandevaluationofmultistakeholderplatformsinintegratedlandscapeinitiatives |