Cargando…

JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

PURPOSE: This study explored the superiority of temozolomide (TMZ) + interferonβ (IFNβ) to standard TMZ as treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) via randomized phase II screening design. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven GBM, with 50% of the tumor lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakabayashi, Toshihiko, Natsume, Atsushi, Mizusawa, Junki, Katayama, Hiroshi, Fukuda, Haruhiko, Sumi, Minako, Nishikawa, Ryo, Narita, Yoshitaka, Muragaki, Yoshihiro, Maruyama, Takashi, Ito, Tamio, Beppu, Takaaki, Nakamura, Hideo, Kayama, Takamasa, Sato, Shinya, Nagane, Motoo, Mishima, Kazuhiko, Nakasu, Yoko, Kurisu, Kaoru, Yamasaki, Fumiyuki, Sugiyama, Kazuhiko, Onishi, Takanori, Iwadate, Yasuo, Terasaki, Mizuhiko, Kobayashi, Hiroyuki, Matsumura, Akira, Ishikawa, Eiichi, Sasaki, Hikaru, Mukasa, Akitake, Matsuo, Takayuki, Hirano, Hirofumi, Kumabe, Toshihiro, Shinoura, Nobusada, Hashimoto, Naoya, Aoki, Tomokazu, Asai, Akio, Abe, Tatsuya, Yoshino, Atsuo, Arakawa, Yoshiki, Asano, Kenichiro, Yoshimoto, Koji, Shibui, Soichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29557060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2831-7
_version_ 1783331376118890496
author Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
Natsume, Atsushi
Mizusawa, Junki
Katayama, Hiroshi
Fukuda, Haruhiko
Sumi, Minako
Nishikawa, Ryo
Narita, Yoshitaka
Muragaki, Yoshihiro
Maruyama, Takashi
Ito, Tamio
Beppu, Takaaki
Nakamura, Hideo
Kayama, Takamasa
Sato, Shinya
Nagane, Motoo
Mishima, Kazuhiko
Nakasu, Yoko
Kurisu, Kaoru
Yamasaki, Fumiyuki
Sugiyama, Kazuhiko
Onishi, Takanori
Iwadate, Yasuo
Terasaki, Mizuhiko
Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
Matsumura, Akira
Ishikawa, Eiichi
Sasaki, Hikaru
Mukasa, Akitake
Matsuo, Takayuki
Hirano, Hirofumi
Kumabe, Toshihiro
Shinoura, Nobusada
Hashimoto, Naoya
Aoki, Tomokazu
Asai, Akio
Abe, Tatsuya
Yoshino, Atsuo
Arakawa, Yoshiki
Asano, Kenichiro
Yoshimoto, Koji
Shibui, Soichiro
author_facet Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
Natsume, Atsushi
Mizusawa, Junki
Katayama, Hiroshi
Fukuda, Haruhiko
Sumi, Minako
Nishikawa, Ryo
Narita, Yoshitaka
Muragaki, Yoshihiro
Maruyama, Takashi
Ito, Tamio
Beppu, Takaaki
Nakamura, Hideo
Kayama, Takamasa
Sato, Shinya
Nagane, Motoo
Mishima, Kazuhiko
Nakasu, Yoko
Kurisu, Kaoru
Yamasaki, Fumiyuki
Sugiyama, Kazuhiko
Onishi, Takanori
Iwadate, Yasuo
Terasaki, Mizuhiko
Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
Matsumura, Akira
Ishikawa, Eiichi
Sasaki, Hikaru
Mukasa, Akitake
Matsuo, Takayuki
Hirano, Hirofumi
Kumabe, Toshihiro
Shinoura, Nobusada
Hashimoto, Naoya
Aoki, Tomokazu
Asai, Akio
Abe, Tatsuya
Yoshino, Atsuo
Arakawa, Yoshiki
Asano, Kenichiro
Yoshimoto, Koji
Shibui, Soichiro
author_sort Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study explored the superiority of temozolomide (TMZ) + interferonβ (IFNβ) to standard TMZ as treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) via randomized phase II screening design. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven GBM, with 50% of the tumor located in supratentorial areas, without involvement of the optic, olfactory nerves, and pituitary gland and without multiple lesions and dissemination. Patients in the TMZ + radiotherapy (RT) arm received RT (2.0 Gy/fr/day, 30 fr) with TMZ (75 mg/m(2), daily) followed by TMZ maintenance (100–200 mg/m(2)/day, days 1–5, every 4 weeks) for 2 years. Patients in the TMZ + IFNβ + RT arm intravenously received IFNβ (3 MU/body, alternative days during RT and day 1, every 4 weeks during maintenance period) and TMZ + RT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The planned sample size was 120 (one-sided alpha 0.2; power 0.8). RESULTS: Between Apr 2010 and Jan 2012, 122 patients were randomized. The median OS with TMZ + RT and TMZ + IFNβ + RT was 20.3 and 24.0 months (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.65–1.55; one-sided log rank P = 0.51). The median progression-free survival times were 10.1 and 8.5 months (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.85–1.84). The incidence of neutropenia with the TMZ + RT and the TMZ + IFNβ + RT (grade 3–4, CTCAE version 3.0) was 12.7 versus 20.7% during concomitant period and was 3.6 versus 9.3% during maintenance period. The incidence of lymphopenia was 54.0 versus 63.8% and 34.5 versus 41.9%. CONCLUSIONS: TMZ + IFNβ + RT is not considered as a candidate for the following phase III trial, and TMZ + RT remained to be a most promising treatment. This trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000003466.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59991642018-06-28 JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma Wakabayashi, Toshihiko Natsume, Atsushi Mizusawa, Junki Katayama, Hiroshi Fukuda, Haruhiko Sumi, Minako Nishikawa, Ryo Narita, Yoshitaka Muragaki, Yoshihiro Maruyama, Takashi Ito, Tamio Beppu, Takaaki Nakamura, Hideo Kayama, Takamasa Sato, Shinya Nagane, Motoo Mishima, Kazuhiko Nakasu, Yoko Kurisu, Kaoru Yamasaki, Fumiyuki Sugiyama, Kazuhiko Onishi, Takanori Iwadate, Yasuo Terasaki, Mizuhiko Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Matsumura, Akira Ishikawa, Eiichi Sasaki, Hikaru Mukasa, Akitake Matsuo, Takayuki Hirano, Hirofumi Kumabe, Toshihiro Shinoura, Nobusada Hashimoto, Naoya Aoki, Tomokazu Asai, Akio Abe, Tatsuya Yoshino, Atsuo Arakawa, Yoshiki Asano, Kenichiro Yoshimoto, Koji Shibui, Soichiro J Neurooncol Clinical Study PURPOSE: This study explored the superiority of temozolomide (TMZ) + interferonβ (IFNβ) to standard TMZ as treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) via randomized phase II screening design. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven GBM, with 50% of the tumor located in supratentorial areas, without involvement of the optic, olfactory nerves, and pituitary gland and without multiple lesions and dissemination. Patients in the TMZ + radiotherapy (RT) arm received RT (2.0 Gy/fr/day, 30 fr) with TMZ (75 mg/m(2), daily) followed by TMZ maintenance (100–200 mg/m(2)/day, days 1–5, every 4 weeks) for 2 years. Patients in the TMZ + IFNβ + RT arm intravenously received IFNβ (3 MU/body, alternative days during RT and day 1, every 4 weeks during maintenance period) and TMZ + RT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The planned sample size was 120 (one-sided alpha 0.2; power 0.8). RESULTS: Between Apr 2010 and Jan 2012, 122 patients were randomized. The median OS with TMZ + RT and TMZ + IFNβ + RT was 20.3 and 24.0 months (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.65–1.55; one-sided log rank P = 0.51). The median progression-free survival times were 10.1 and 8.5 months (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.85–1.84). The incidence of neutropenia with the TMZ + RT and the TMZ + IFNβ + RT (grade 3–4, CTCAE version 3.0) was 12.7 versus 20.7% during concomitant period and was 3.6 versus 9.3% during maintenance period. The incidence of lymphopenia was 54.0 versus 63.8% and 34.5 versus 41.9%. CONCLUSIONS: TMZ + IFNβ + RT is not considered as a candidate for the following phase III trial, and TMZ + RT remained to be a most promising treatment. This trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000003466. Springer US 2018-03-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5999164/ /pubmed/29557060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2831-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
Natsume, Atsushi
Mizusawa, Junki
Katayama, Hiroshi
Fukuda, Haruhiko
Sumi, Minako
Nishikawa, Ryo
Narita, Yoshitaka
Muragaki, Yoshihiro
Maruyama, Takashi
Ito, Tamio
Beppu, Takaaki
Nakamura, Hideo
Kayama, Takamasa
Sato, Shinya
Nagane, Motoo
Mishima, Kazuhiko
Nakasu, Yoko
Kurisu, Kaoru
Yamasaki, Fumiyuki
Sugiyama, Kazuhiko
Onishi, Takanori
Iwadate, Yasuo
Terasaki, Mizuhiko
Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
Matsumura, Akira
Ishikawa, Eiichi
Sasaki, Hikaru
Mukasa, Akitake
Matsuo, Takayuki
Hirano, Hirofumi
Kumabe, Toshihiro
Shinoura, Nobusada
Hashimoto, Naoya
Aoki, Tomokazu
Asai, Akio
Abe, Tatsuya
Yoshino, Atsuo
Arakawa, Yoshiki
Asano, Kenichiro
Yoshimoto, Koji
Shibui, Soichiro
JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
title JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
title_full JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
title_fullStr JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
title_short JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
title_sort jcog0911 integra study: a randomized screening phase ii trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29557060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2831-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wakabayashitoshihiko jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT natsumeatsushi jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT mizusawajunki jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT katayamahiroshi jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT fukudaharuhiko jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT sumiminako jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT nishikawaryo jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT naritayoshitaka jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT muragakiyoshihiro jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT maruyamatakashi jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT itotamio jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT bepputakaaki jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT nakamurahideo jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT kayamatakamasa jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT satoshinya jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT naganemotoo jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT mishimakazuhiko jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT nakasuyoko jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT kurisukaoru jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT yamasakifumiyuki jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT sugiyamakazuhiko jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT onishitakanori jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT iwadateyasuo jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT terasakimizuhiko jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT kobayashihiroyuki jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT matsumuraakira jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT ishikawaeiichi jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT sasakihikaru jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT mukasaakitake jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT matsuotakayuki jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT hiranohirofumi jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT kumabetoshihiro jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT shinouranobusada jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT hashimotonaoya jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT aokitomokazu jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT asaiakio jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT abetatsuya jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT yoshinoatsuo jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT arakawayoshiki jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT asanokenichiro jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT yoshimotokoji jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT shibuisoichiro jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma
AT jcog0911integrastudyarandomizedscreeningphaseiitrialofinterferonbplustemozolomideincomparisonwithtemozolomidealonefornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma