Cargando…

Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers

Until recently, no prediction models for Lynch syndrome (LS) had been validated for PMS2 mutation carriers. We aimed to evaluate MMRpredict and PREMM5 in a clinical cohort and for PMS2 mutation carriers specifically. In a retrospective, clinic-based cohort we calculated predictions for LS according...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goverde, A., Spaander, M. C. W., Nieboer, D., van den Ouweland, A. M. W., Dinjens, W. N. M., Dubbink, H. J., Tops, C. J., ten Broeke, S. W., Bruno, M. J., Hofstra, R. M. W., Steyerberg, E. W., Wagner, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28933000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-017-0039-1
_version_ 1783331377831215104
author Goverde, A.
Spaander, M. C. W.
Nieboer, D.
van den Ouweland, A. M. W.
Dinjens, W. N. M.
Dubbink, H. J.
Tops, C. J.
ten Broeke, S. W.
Bruno, M. J.
Hofstra, R. M. W.
Steyerberg, E. W.
Wagner, A.
author_facet Goverde, A.
Spaander, M. C. W.
Nieboer, D.
van den Ouweland, A. M. W.
Dinjens, W. N. M.
Dubbink, H. J.
Tops, C. J.
ten Broeke, S. W.
Bruno, M. J.
Hofstra, R. M. W.
Steyerberg, E. W.
Wagner, A.
author_sort Goverde, A.
collection PubMed
description Until recently, no prediction models for Lynch syndrome (LS) had been validated for PMS2 mutation carriers. We aimed to evaluate MMRpredict and PREMM5 in a clinical cohort and for PMS2 mutation carriers specifically. In a retrospective, clinic-based cohort we calculated predictions for LS according to MMRpredict and PREMM5. The area under the operator receiving characteristic curve (AUC) was compared between MMRpredict and PREMM5 for LS patients in general and for different LS genes specifically. Of 734 index patients, 83 (11%) were diagnosed with LS; 23 MLH1, 17 MSH2, 31 MSH6 and 12 PMS2 mutation carriers. Both prediction models performed well for MLH1 and MSH2 (AUC 0.80 and 0.83 for PREMM5 and 0.79 for MMRpredict) and fair for MSH6 mutation carriers (0.69 for PREMM5 and 0.66 for MMRpredict). MMRpredict performed fair for PMS2 mutation carriers (AUC 0.72), while PREMM5 failed to discriminate PMS2 mutation carriers from non-mutation carriers (AUC 0.51). The only statistically significant difference between PMS2 mutation carriers and non-mutation carriers was proximal location of colorectal cancer (77 vs. 28%, p < 0.001). Adding location of colorectal cancer to PREMM5 considerably improved the models performance for PMS2 mutation carriers (AUC 0.77) and overall (AUC 0.81 vs. 0.72). We validated these results in an external cohort of 376 colorectal cancer patients, including 158 LS patients. MMRpredict and PREMM5 cannot adequately identify PMS2 mutation carriers. Adding location of colorectal cancer to PREMM5 may improve the performance of this model, which should be validated in larger cohorts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10689-017-0039-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59991712018-06-28 Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers Goverde, A. Spaander, M. C. W. Nieboer, D. van den Ouweland, A. M. W. Dinjens, W. N. M. Dubbink, H. J. Tops, C. J. ten Broeke, S. W. Bruno, M. J. Hofstra, R. M. W. Steyerberg, E. W. Wagner, A. Fam Cancer Original Article Until recently, no prediction models for Lynch syndrome (LS) had been validated for PMS2 mutation carriers. We aimed to evaluate MMRpredict and PREMM5 in a clinical cohort and for PMS2 mutation carriers specifically. In a retrospective, clinic-based cohort we calculated predictions for LS according to MMRpredict and PREMM5. The area under the operator receiving characteristic curve (AUC) was compared between MMRpredict and PREMM5 for LS patients in general and for different LS genes specifically. Of 734 index patients, 83 (11%) were diagnosed with LS; 23 MLH1, 17 MSH2, 31 MSH6 and 12 PMS2 mutation carriers. Both prediction models performed well for MLH1 and MSH2 (AUC 0.80 and 0.83 for PREMM5 and 0.79 for MMRpredict) and fair for MSH6 mutation carriers (0.69 for PREMM5 and 0.66 for MMRpredict). MMRpredict performed fair for PMS2 mutation carriers (AUC 0.72), while PREMM5 failed to discriminate PMS2 mutation carriers from non-mutation carriers (AUC 0.51). The only statistically significant difference between PMS2 mutation carriers and non-mutation carriers was proximal location of colorectal cancer (77 vs. 28%, p < 0.001). Adding location of colorectal cancer to PREMM5 considerably improved the models performance for PMS2 mutation carriers (AUC 0.77) and overall (AUC 0.81 vs. 0.72). We validated these results in an external cohort of 376 colorectal cancer patients, including 158 LS patients. MMRpredict and PREMM5 cannot adequately identify PMS2 mutation carriers. Adding location of colorectal cancer to PREMM5 may improve the performance of this model, which should be validated in larger cohorts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10689-017-0039-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2017-09-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5999171/ /pubmed/28933000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-017-0039-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goverde, A.
Spaander, M. C. W.
Nieboer, D.
van den Ouweland, A. M. W.
Dinjens, W. N. M.
Dubbink, H. J.
Tops, C. J.
ten Broeke, S. W.
Bruno, M. J.
Hofstra, R. M. W.
Steyerberg, E. W.
Wagner, A.
Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers
title Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers
title_full Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers
title_fullStr Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers
title_short Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers
title_sort evaluation of current prediction models for lynch syndrome: updating the premm5 model to identify pms2 mutation carriers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28933000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-017-0039-1
work_keys_str_mv AT goverdea evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT spaandermcw evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT nieboerd evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT vandenouwelandamw evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT dinjenswnm evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT dubbinkhj evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT topscj evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT tenbroekesw evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT brunomj evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT hofstrarmw evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT steyerbergew evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers
AT wagnera evaluationofcurrentpredictionmodelsforlynchsyndromeupdatingthepremm5modeltoidentifypms2mutationcarriers