Cargando…

Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?

PURPOSE: Radial scar’s stellate appearance may mimic carcinoma mammographically and histologically. Management of radial scar (RS) found on breast core needle biopsies (CNB) ranges from excision to clinical observation due to the variation in reported upgrades to malignancy at surgical excision. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chou, Wendy Yen Yun, Veis, Deborah J., Aft, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29532340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4741-y
_version_ 1783331380790296576
author Chou, Wendy Yen Yun
Veis, Deborah J.
Aft, Rebecca
author_facet Chou, Wendy Yen Yun
Veis, Deborah J.
Aft, Rebecca
author_sort Chou, Wendy Yen Yun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Radial scar’s stellate appearance may mimic carcinoma mammographically and histologically. Management of radial scar (RS) found on breast core needle biopsies (CNB) ranges from excision to clinical observation due to the variation in reported upgrades to malignancy at surgical excision. We examined the upgrade rate in patients with RS detected on CNB at our institution and reviewed the current literature. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all cases with RS diagnosed on CNB between December 2006 and March 2017 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were patients with “pure” RS and RS associated with high-risk lesions (HRL). Upgrade was defined as invasive or non-invasive cancer in the excisional biopsy. RESULTS: 157 cases were identified with RS on CNB, and 122 cases met inclusion criteria. Of these 122 cases, 91 (75%) had pure RS on CNB while 31 (25%) had associated atypia or HRL. 81 (66%) of patients proceeded to excisional biopsy and 41 (34%) did not. Two patients (1.6% of total) were found to have a low-grade invasive ductal carcinoma (0.6 and 0.8 cm) upon surgical excision. None of the remaining 120 patients developed an ipsilateral breast cancer with a mean of 32.3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We found a very low upgrade rate to breast cancer when RS was found on CNB with or without associated HRL. Our results are consistent with other reported series. Our data do not support surgical excision for RS but rather close clinical follow-up for patients with RS on CNB. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4741-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59991832018-06-28 Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary? Chou, Wendy Yen Yun Veis, Deborah J. Aft, Rebecca Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial PURPOSE: Radial scar’s stellate appearance may mimic carcinoma mammographically and histologically. Management of radial scar (RS) found on breast core needle biopsies (CNB) ranges from excision to clinical observation due to the variation in reported upgrades to malignancy at surgical excision. We examined the upgrade rate in patients with RS detected on CNB at our institution and reviewed the current literature. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all cases with RS diagnosed on CNB between December 2006 and March 2017 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were patients with “pure” RS and RS associated with high-risk lesions (HRL). Upgrade was defined as invasive or non-invasive cancer in the excisional biopsy. RESULTS: 157 cases were identified with RS on CNB, and 122 cases met inclusion criteria. Of these 122 cases, 91 (75%) had pure RS on CNB while 31 (25%) had associated atypia or HRL. 81 (66%) of patients proceeded to excisional biopsy and 41 (34%) did not. Two patients (1.6% of total) were found to have a low-grade invasive ductal carcinoma (0.6 and 0.8 cm) upon surgical excision. None of the remaining 120 patients developed an ipsilateral breast cancer with a mean of 32.3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We found a very low upgrade rate to breast cancer when RS was found on CNB with or without associated HRL. Our results are consistent with other reported series. Our data do not support surgical excision for RS but rather close clinical follow-up for patients with RS on CNB. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4741-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-03-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5999183/ /pubmed/29532340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4741-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial
Chou, Wendy Yen Yun
Veis, Deborah J.
Aft, Rebecca
Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?
title Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?
title_full Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?
title_fullStr Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?
title_short Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?
title_sort radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?
topic Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29532340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4741-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chouwendyyenyun radialscaronimageguidedbreastbiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT veisdeborahj radialscaronimageguidedbreastbiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT aftrebecca radialscaronimageguidedbreastbiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary