Cargando…
MRI Verification of a 10–20 Targeting Protocol Used During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sessions for Tinnitus
Langguth et al. (2006) described a method for targeting primary auditory cortex (PAC) during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using the 10–20 electroencephalography system. Study aims were to measure the degree of accuracy in placing the TMS coil on the scalp overlying PAC using the 10–20 met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0636-9 |
_version_ | 1783331382015033344 |
---|---|
author | Theodoroff, Sarah M. Stevens, Alexander A. McMillan, Garnett Pettersson, David R. Woodward, William Folmer, Robert L. |
author_facet | Theodoroff, Sarah M. Stevens, Alexander A. McMillan, Garnett Pettersson, David R. Woodward, William Folmer, Robert L. |
author_sort | Theodoroff, Sarah M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Langguth et al. (2006) described a method for targeting primary auditory cortex (PAC) during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using the 10–20 electroencephalography system. Study aims were to measure the degree of accuracy in placing the TMS coil on the scalp overlying PAC using the 10–20 method and determine the extent to which accuracy depends on the hemisphere of the coil placement. Twelve participants underwent anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of their head in a 3T scanner. Before imaging, a fiducial marker was placed on their scalp corresponding to the TMS coil position. MRI scans were analyzed to determine the distance from the fiducial marker to PAC for each participant. On average, the 10–20 method resulted in distances in the medial–lateral, anterior-posterior, and inferior-superior dimensions that were within a few millimeters (~ 4 mm) of each other between the left and right hemispheres. The fiducial marker was, on average, 10.4 mm superior and 10.8 mm posterior to the optimal scalp location that minimized the distance to PAC. Individual asymmetries and other systematic differences found in this study raise important considerations to keep in mind that might necessitate using an MRI-guided method of coil-positioning when targeting PAC for TMS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5999188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59991882018-06-28 MRI Verification of a 10–20 Targeting Protocol Used During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sessions for Tinnitus Theodoroff, Sarah M. Stevens, Alexander A. McMillan, Garnett Pettersson, David R. Woodward, William Folmer, Robert L. Brain Topogr Original Paper Langguth et al. (2006) described a method for targeting primary auditory cortex (PAC) during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using the 10–20 electroencephalography system. Study aims were to measure the degree of accuracy in placing the TMS coil on the scalp overlying PAC using the 10–20 method and determine the extent to which accuracy depends on the hemisphere of the coil placement. Twelve participants underwent anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of their head in a 3T scanner. Before imaging, a fiducial marker was placed on their scalp corresponding to the TMS coil position. MRI scans were analyzed to determine the distance from the fiducial marker to PAC for each participant. On average, the 10–20 method resulted in distances in the medial–lateral, anterior-posterior, and inferior-superior dimensions that were within a few millimeters (~ 4 mm) of each other between the left and right hemispheres. The fiducial marker was, on average, 10.4 mm superior and 10.8 mm posterior to the optimal scalp location that minimized the distance to PAC. Individual asymmetries and other systematic differences found in this study raise important considerations to keep in mind that might necessitate using an MRI-guided method of coil-positioning when targeting PAC for TMS. Springer US 2018-02-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5999188/ /pubmed/29464519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0636-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Theodoroff, Sarah M. Stevens, Alexander A. McMillan, Garnett Pettersson, David R. Woodward, William Folmer, Robert L. MRI Verification of a 10–20 Targeting Protocol Used During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sessions for Tinnitus |
title | MRI Verification of a 10–20 Targeting Protocol Used During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sessions for Tinnitus |
title_full | MRI Verification of a 10–20 Targeting Protocol Used During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sessions for Tinnitus |
title_fullStr | MRI Verification of a 10–20 Targeting Protocol Used During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sessions for Tinnitus |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI Verification of a 10–20 Targeting Protocol Used During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sessions for Tinnitus |
title_short | MRI Verification of a 10–20 Targeting Protocol Used During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sessions for Tinnitus |
title_sort | mri verification of a 10–20 targeting protocol used during transcranial magnetic stimulation sessions for tinnitus |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0636-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT theodoroffsarahm mriverificationofa1020targetingprotocolusedduringtranscranialmagneticstimulationsessionsfortinnitus AT stevensalexandera mriverificationofa1020targetingprotocolusedduringtranscranialmagneticstimulationsessionsfortinnitus AT mcmillangarnett mriverificationofa1020targetingprotocolusedduringtranscranialmagneticstimulationsessionsfortinnitus AT petterssondavidr mriverificationofa1020targetingprotocolusedduringtranscranialmagneticstimulationsessionsfortinnitus AT woodwardwilliam mriverificationofa1020targetingprotocolusedduringtranscranialmagneticstimulationsessionsfortinnitus AT folmerrobertl mriverificationofa1020targetingprotocolusedduringtranscranialmagneticstimulationsessionsfortinnitus |