Cargando…

Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Innovations in eHealth technologies have the potential to help older adults live independently, maintain their quality of life, and to reduce their health system dependency and health care expenditure. The objective of this study was to systematically review and appraise the quality of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanyal, Chiranjeev, Stolee, Paul, Juzwishin, Don, Husereau, Don
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198112
_version_ 1783331397194219520
author Sanyal, Chiranjeev
Stolee, Paul
Juzwishin, Don
Husereau, Don
author_facet Sanyal, Chiranjeev
Stolee, Paul
Juzwishin, Don
Husereau, Don
author_sort Sanyal, Chiranjeev
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Innovations in eHealth technologies have the potential to help older adults live independently, maintain their quality of life, and to reduce their health system dependency and health care expenditure. The objective of this study was to systematically review and appraise the quality of cost-effectiveness or utility studies assessing eHealth technologies in study populations involving older adults. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, NHS EED, and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2000 to 2016 that examined cost-effectiveness (or utility) of eHealth technologies. The reporting quality of included studies was appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. RESULTS: Eleven full text articles met the inclusion criteria representing public and private health care systems. eHealth technologies evaluated by these studies includes computerized decision support system, a web-based physical activity intervention, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy, telecare, and telehealth. Overall, the reporting quality of the studies included in the review was varied. Most studies demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an intervention using a randomized control trial and statistical modeling, respectively. This review found limited information on the feasibility of adopting these technologies based on economic and organizational factors. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified few economic evaluations of eHealth technologies that included older adults. The quality of the current evidence is limited and further research is warranted to clearly demonstrate the long-term cost-effectiveness of eHealth technologies from the health care system and societal perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59992772018-06-21 Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review Sanyal, Chiranjeev Stolee, Paul Juzwishin, Don Husereau, Don PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Innovations in eHealth technologies have the potential to help older adults live independently, maintain their quality of life, and to reduce their health system dependency and health care expenditure. The objective of this study was to systematically review and appraise the quality of cost-effectiveness or utility studies assessing eHealth technologies in study populations involving older adults. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, NHS EED, and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2000 to 2016 that examined cost-effectiveness (or utility) of eHealth technologies. The reporting quality of included studies was appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. RESULTS: Eleven full text articles met the inclusion criteria representing public and private health care systems. eHealth technologies evaluated by these studies includes computerized decision support system, a web-based physical activity intervention, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy, telecare, and telehealth. Overall, the reporting quality of the studies included in the review was varied. Most studies demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an intervention using a randomized control trial and statistical modeling, respectively. This review found limited information on the feasibility of adopting these technologies based on economic and organizational factors. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified few economic evaluations of eHealth technologies that included older adults. The quality of the current evidence is limited and further research is warranted to clearly demonstrate the long-term cost-effectiveness of eHealth technologies from the health care system and societal perspectives. Public Library of Science 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5999277/ /pubmed/29897921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198112 Text en © 2018 Sanyal et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sanyal, Chiranjeev
Stolee, Paul
Juzwishin, Don
Husereau, Don
Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review
title Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review
title_full Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review
title_fullStr Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review
title_short Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review
title_sort economic evaluations of ehealth technologies: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198112
work_keys_str_mv AT sanyalchiranjeev economicevaluationsofehealthtechnologiesasystematicreview
AT stoleepaul economicevaluationsofehealthtechnologiesasystematicreview
AT juzwishindon economicevaluationsofehealthtechnologiesasystematicreview
AT husereaudon economicevaluationsofehealthtechnologiesasystematicreview