Cargando…

A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery

BACKGROUND: The utility and efficacy of 3-dimensional representation have been proven in bony reconstruction; however, its role in soft-tissue reconstruction remains limited. There is currently no reliable gold standard to objectively measure flap volume. This systematic review aims to summarize the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azzi, Alain Joe, Hilzenrat, Roy, Viezel-Mathieu, Alex, Hemmerling, Thomas, Gilardino, Mirko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001752
_version_ 1783331421641768960
author Azzi, Alain Joe
Hilzenrat, Roy
Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
Hemmerling, Thomas
Gilardino, Mirko
author_facet Azzi, Alain Joe
Hilzenrat, Roy
Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
Hemmerling, Thomas
Gilardino, Mirko
author_sort Azzi, Alain Joe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The utility and efficacy of 3-dimensional representation have been proven in bony reconstruction; however, its role in soft-tissue reconstruction remains limited. There is currently no reliable gold standard to objectively measure flap volume. This systematic review aims to summarize the available techniques used to objectively measure flap volume in reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify all relevant articles describing objective techniques to quantify flap volume. The search included published articles in 3 electronic databases—Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were included. Flap volume was calculated using the following techniques: magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, 3-dimensional imaging and modeling, material templates, ultrasound, and weighing scales. Techniques and results of the included studies are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a summary of various published techniques for objective pre- or intraoperative quantification of flap volume in reconstructive surgery. The preliminary results from this review are promising, and we believe that 3-dimensional representation and objective quantification is the future of reconstructive flap surgery. More studies are needed to study the clinical relevancy and impact of the various imaging modalities reviewed and to develop automated volumetric measurement technology with improved accuracy, efficacy, and reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59994302018-06-19 A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery Azzi, Alain Joe Hilzenrat, Roy Viezel-Mathieu, Alex Hemmerling, Thomas Gilardino, Mirko Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The utility and efficacy of 3-dimensional representation have been proven in bony reconstruction; however, its role in soft-tissue reconstruction remains limited. There is currently no reliable gold standard to objectively measure flap volume. This systematic review aims to summarize the available techniques used to objectively measure flap volume in reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify all relevant articles describing objective techniques to quantify flap volume. The search included published articles in 3 electronic databases—Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were included. Flap volume was calculated using the following techniques: magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, 3-dimensional imaging and modeling, material templates, ultrasound, and weighing scales. Techniques and results of the included studies are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a summary of various published techniques for objective pre- or intraoperative quantification of flap volume in reconstructive surgery. The preliminary results from this review are promising, and we believe that 3-dimensional representation and objective quantification is the future of reconstructive flap surgery. More studies are needed to study the clinical relevancy and impact of the various imaging modalities reviewed and to develop automated volumetric measurement technology with improved accuracy, efficacy, and reproducibility. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5999430/ /pubmed/29922550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001752 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Azzi, Alain Joe
Hilzenrat, Roy
Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
Hemmerling, Thomas
Gilardino, Mirko
A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery
title A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery
title_full A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery
title_fullStr A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery
title_short A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery
title_sort review of objective measurement of flap volume in reconstructive surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001752
work_keys_str_mv AT azzialainjoe areviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT hilzenratroy areviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT viezelmathieualex areviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT hemmerlingthomas areviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT gilardinomirko areviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT azzialainjoe reviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT hilzenratroy reviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT viezelmathieualex reviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT hemmerlingthomas reviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery
AT gilardinomirko reviewofobjectivemeasurementofflapvolumeinreconstructivesurgery